بررسی عوامل اثرگذار بر موفقیت فرآیند انتقال دانش در همکاری‌های استراتژیک میان‌سازمانی (موردمطالعه: همکاری‌های میان شرکت‌های داروسازی)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشگاه تهران.

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه تهران.

3 استادیار، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

4 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه تهران.

چکیده

مزیت رقابتی سازمان ­ها در عصر حاضر بیش از هر چیزی به دسترسی آن‌ها به منابع دانشی بستگی دارد. تحول سریع دانش و گستردگی منابع دانشی بین شرکت ­های مختلف، دسترسی به دانش را برای یک سازمان به‌تنهایی دشوار ساخته و سازمان ­ها را وادار کرده است که برای دسترسی به دانش موردنیازشان به همکاری با یکدیگر روی بیاورند. آمارها نشان ­دهنده افزایش همکاری­ ها با هدف کسب دانش، به ­خصوص در صنایع دانش‌بنیانی مانند صنعت داروسازی است. مبانی نظری گسترده­ای در زمینه عوامل اثرگذار بر فرآیند انتقال دانش در همکاری­ ها وجود دارد، اما تاکنون پژوهش فراگیری درباره روابط میان این عوامل و اهمیت آن‌ها انجام نشده است. این پژوهش سعی در شناسایی عوامل اثرگذار بر موفقیت فرآیند انتقال دانش در همکاری­ ها و سنجش اهمیت این عوامل و همچنین روابط آن‌ها دارد. در این راستا 10 عامل اثرگذار بر فرآیند انتقال دانش از مبانی نظری استخراج شده و در دو دسته عوامل سطح سازمان و عوامل سطح همکاری، دسته ­بندی می ­شوند؛ سپس با نظر­سنجی از مدیران شرکت­ های دارویی که در همکاری ­های صنعت داروسازی درگیر بوده ­اند، روابط میان عوامل و اهمیت آن‌ها تحلیل می ­شود. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که استراتژی سازمان تأثیرگذارترین عامل و سرمایه اجتماعی مهم ­ترین عامل از میان تمامی عوامل است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

An Investigation on the Factors Affecting the Success of Knowledge Transfer Process in Inter-Firm Collaborations (Case: Pharmaceutical Firm Collaborations)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Nima Mokhtarzadeh 1
  • Seyed Moustafa Razavi 2
  • Hadi Nilforooshan 3
  • Maryam Faghei 4
1 Assistant Professor, University of Tehran.
2 Associate Professor, University of Tehran.
3 Assistant Professor, University of Shahid Beheshti.
4 Ph.D Student, University of Tehran.
چکیده [English]

     Today, competitive advantage of organizations depends mostly on their access to knowledge resources. Rapid development of knowledge and expansion of knowledge resources among different organizations make it difficult for organizations to access knowledge on their own. This obliges organizations to cooperate with each other in order to acquire their knowledge needs. Statistics indicate an increase in strategic collaboration with the aim of acquiring knowledge, especially in knowledge-based industries such as the pharmaceutical industry. There is an extensive literature on factors affecting the processes of knowledge transfer and learning in collaborations; however, so far no comprehensive study has been done in this regard. This study aimed to identify and investigate factors affecting the success of knowledge transfer and learning in strategic collaborations between Iranian pharmaceutical companies. Following the detailed review of previous studies, ten factors affecting the knowledge transfer process were extracted and categorized into two categories: factors at the level of organization, and factors at the level of cooperation. Finally, the importance of them was explained using the opinions of managers of some pharmaceutical companies engaged in strategic cooperation. Results indicate that "Organizational strategy" is the most influential factor and "social capital" is the most important factor.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge Transfer
  • Technology Transfer
  • Inter-Firm Collaborations
  • Knowledge Acquisition
  • Organizational Learning

مراجع

1. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study, 45(3), 425–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667105
3. AlShamsi, O., & Ajmal, M. (2018). Critical factors for knowledge sharing in technology-intensive organizations: evidence from UAE service sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(2), 384-412.
4. Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. (2000). DO FIRMS LEARN TO CREATE VALUE ? THE CASE OF ALLIANCES, 315, 295-315.
5. Anderson, E. (1990). Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance. MIT Sloan Management Review.
6. Atellas Pharma, U. S. (2016). Inc. 2015. Mycamine Injection Package Insert. Https://dailymed. Nlm. Nih. gov/dailymed/drugInfo. Cfm.
7. Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillon, R. (2016). Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: a framework from critical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1195-1234.
8. Carayannis, E. (1998). The strategic management of technological learning in project/ program management: The role of extranets, intranets and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging. Technovation, 18(11), 697-703.
9. Carayannis, E., & Kassicieh, S. (1996). Managing higher order technological learning: a factor in predicting firm market performance System Sciences.
10. Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American enterprise. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge.
11. Chatenier, E., Verstegen, J., Mulder, M., & Omta, O. (2009). The Challenges of Collaborative Knowledge Creation in Open Innovation Teams, 8(3).
12. Chiesa, V., & Manzini, R. (1998). Organizing for technological collaborations : a managerial perspective, 199-212.
13. Child, J. (1984). Organization: A guide to problems and practice.
14. Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, Status Similiarity, and Social Capital as Drivers of Alliance Formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1-22.
15. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly.
16. Colombo, M., & Garrone, P. (1996). Technological cooperative agreements and firm’s R & D intensity. A note on causality relations. Research Policy.
17. Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., & Viguerie, S. (2000). Strategy under uncertainty. The McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 6.
18.Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B.-S. S. (2003). Transferring R & D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management-JET-M, 20(1-2SPEC.), 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1016 /S0923-4748(03)00004-3.
19. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20. Das, T., & Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review.
21. DiMasi, J. A., Hansen, R. W., Grabowski, H. G., & Lasagna, L. (1991). Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Health Economics, 10(2), 107-142.
22. Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures. Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400303
23. Dorosrkar, N., & Shafie, M. (2015). An Intelligent Fuzzy Model to Evaluate Knowledge Management Processes in Supply Chain (Case: Iran- Khodro Company). Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 18, 153-175 (In Persian(.
24. Doz, Y. L. (1996). The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 55-83.
25. Dyer, J., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case. Source: Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345-367.
26. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
27. Easterby‐Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2008). Inter‐organizational knowledge transfer: Current themes and future prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 45(4), 677-690.
28. Eisenhardt, K. M., Schoonhoven, C. B., Science, S. O., Apr, N. M., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bird, C. (1996). Resource-Based View of Strategic Alliance Formation : Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms, 7(2), 136-150.
29. Farsijani, H., Jalalioon, N., & Mardani, M. (2017). Identifying and explanation the Indicators of Evaluation of Performance of World-Class Management. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 25, 37-66 (In Persian).
30. Ferreras-Mendez, J. L., Fernandez-Mesa, A., & Alegre, J. (2016). The relationship between knowledge search strategies and absorptive capacity: A deeper look. Technovation, 54, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.03.001
31. Fiol, C., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review.
32. Friedman, R. (2008). Principle Concepts of Technology and Innovation Management: Critical Research Models: Critical Research Models.
33. Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal.
34. Ghlichlee, B., Mirzaei, F., & Rahmatee, H. (2018). Effect of Intellectual Capital on Innovation Capacity and Competitive Advantage in SME’s. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 27, 105-126 (In Persian).
35. Gieskes, J., & Heijden, B. van der. (2004). Measuring and Enabling Learning Behaviour in Product Innovation Processes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00299.x
36. Grant, R. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science.
37. Grant, R., & Baden‐Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies.
38. Gulati, R. (1995). Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393756
39. Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Singh, H. (2009). The nature of partnering experience and the gains from alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1213-1233. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.786
40. Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work and those that don’t. Jossey-Bass.
41. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 83-103.
42. Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Lee, H. (2000). Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3-4), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00024-2
43. Hoffmann, W., & Schlosser, R. (2001). Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises: An empirical survey. Long Range Planning, 34(3), 357-381.
44. Rahmanseresht, H., Jaleh Farzaneh. (2018). Facilitating inter-Organizational Knowledge Sharing via Inter-Organizational Trust. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 33, 15-34 (In Persian(.
45. Inkpen, A. (1998). Learning and knowledge acquisition through international strategic alliances, 12(4), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1998.1333953
46. Inkpen, A. C. (1996). Creating knowledge through collaboration. California Management Review, 39(1), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165879
47. Inkpen, A., & Crossan, M. (1995). Believing is seeing: Joint ventures and organization learning. Journal of Management Studies.
48. Inkpen, A., & Currall, S. (2004). The Coevolution of Trust, Control, and Learning in Joint Ventures. Organization Science, 15(5), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0079
49. Inkpen, A., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146-165.
50. Ireland, R., Hitt, M., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 5(9), 208-214.
51. Itami, H., & Numagami, T. (1992). Dynamic interaction between strategy and technology. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130909.
52. J Soltanzadeh, M Elyasi, BamdadSoufi, J., & A Kazazi. (2017). The Effect of Regulatory Policies on the Innovation Capability of Iranian Pharmaceutical Companies. Innovation Management Journal, 6(2), 31-64 (In Persian(.
53. Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2008). The relationship between organizational learning and firms’ financial performance in strategic alliances : A contingency approach. Journal of World Business, 43, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.003.
54. Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2009). An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances. Research Policy, 38(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.002.
55. Karaoz, M., & Albeni, M. (2005). Dynamic technological learning trends in Turkish manufacturing industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(7), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.09.005.
56. Kim, C. S., & Inkpen, A. C. (2005). Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning. Journal of International Management, 11(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2005.06.002.
57. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science.
58. Krackhardt. (1992). The strength of strong ties. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
59. Krogh, G. Von, Roos, J., & Slocum, K. (1994). An essay on corporate epistemology. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250151005.
60. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5), 461-477.
61. Lane, P. J., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY , LEARNING, AND PERFORMANCE IN INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES. Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J, 1161(March), 1139-1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.206
62. Larsson, R., Bengtsson, L., Henriksson, K., & Sparks, J. (1998). The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances. Organization Science, 9(3, Special Issue: Managing Partnerships and Strategic Alliances), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.285
63. Lei, D., Hitt, M. A., & Bettis, R. (1996). Dynamic core competencies through meta learning and strategic context. Journal of Management, 22(4), 549-561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90024-0.
64. Levinthal, D., & Fichman, Q. (1988). Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly.
65. Li, S. X., & Rowley, T. J. (2002). Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1104-1119. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069427.
66. Lin, C.-J., & Wu, W.-W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2006.08.012.
67. Meier, M. (2011). Knowledge Management in Strategic Alliances: A Review of Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00287.x.
68. Moradi, M., Valipour, M., Yakideh, K., Safardoust, A., & Abdollahian, F. (2013). An Investigation on the Role of Knowledge Absorptive Capacity on the Innovative Performance of Organization (Case Study: Pharmaceutical and Insurance Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange). Journal of Business Management Perspective, 1, 79-102 (In Persian).
69. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00066-3.
70. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S., & Sumantra Goshal. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373.
71. Nezafati, N., & Ghafarinia, R. (2018). Identification and Prioritization of Organizational Units for the Pilot Implementation of the Knowledge Management System in Government Organizations (Case study: Cultural Resources Fund). Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 33, 65-85 (In Persian).
72. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. (n.d.). The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited. Econpapers.repec.org.
73. Nieto, M., & Quevedo, P. (2005). Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort, 25, 1141-1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.05.001.
74. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science.
75. Parkhe, A. (1991). INTERFIRM DIVERSITY, ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING, AND LONGEVITY IN GLOBAL STRATEGIC ALLIANCES. Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (September 1990), 579-601.
76. Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1.
77. Ring, P. S., & Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental Processes of Cooperative Inter- Organizational Relationships, (June). https://doi.org/10.2307/258836.
78. Roberts, E., & Mizouchi, R. (1988). Inter-firm technological collaboration: the case of Japanese biotechnology.
79. Samadi, A., Sohrabi, R., & Soleyman, M. S. M. (2013). Evaluation of Strategic Alliance Formation in an Industrial Cluster. Iranian Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41, 50-59 (In Persian(.
80. Schildt, H., Keil, T., & Maula, M. (2012). THE TEMPORAL EFFECTS OF RELATIVE AND FIRM-LEVEL ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY ON INTERORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1154-1173.
81. Schuhmacher, A., Gassmann, O., & Hinder, M. (2016). Changing R&D models in research-based pharmaceutical companies. Journal of Translational Medicine, 14(1), 105.
82. Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595-623.
83. Steensma, H. K. (1996). Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational collaboration: An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management-JET-M, 12(4), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(95)00013-5.
84. Subramaniam, M., & Venkatraman, N. (1999). The influence of leveraging tacit overseas knowledge for global new product development capability: an empirical examination. In M. A. Hitt, R. G. Clifford, R. D. Nixon, & K. P. Coyne (Eds.), Dynamic Strategic Resources. Dynamic Strategic Resources.Wiley, Chichester.
85. Trevithick, S., Flabouris, A., Resuscitation, G. T.-, & 2003, undefined. (n.d.). International EMS systems: New South Wales, Australia. Resuscitationjournal.com.
86. Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal, 464-476.
87. Tsang, E. W. K. (2002). ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE BY FOREIGN PARTNERS FROM INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURES IN A TRANSITION ECONOMY : LEARNING-BY-DOING AND LEARNING MYOPIA. Strategic Management Journal, 854(May), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.251
88. Van Aken, J. E., & Weggeman, M. P. (2000). Managing learning in informal innovation networks: overcoming the Daphne‐dilemma. R&D Management, 30(2), 139-150.
89. Volberda, H., Foss, N., & Lyles, M. (2010). Perspective—Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science.
90. von Hippel, E. (1976). The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process. Research Policy, 5(3), 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7.
91. Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. books.google.com.
92. Wittmann, C. M., Hunt, S. D., & Arnett, D. B. (2009). Explaining Alliance success : Competences, resources, relational factors , and resource-advantage theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(7), 743-756. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.indmarman.2008.02.007.
93. Zollo, M., Reue’r, J. J., Singh, H., Zollo, M., Reuer, J. J., & Singh, H. (2002). Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances, 13(6), 701-713.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار