ارائه مدل ریاضی ارزیابی و اعطای پاداش پروژه‌ای دوره‌ای در سازمان‌های ماتریسی (موردمطالعه: شرکت ایران ارقام)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران.

10.52547/jimp.10.1.65

چکیده

سازمان‌ها و شرکت‌ها همواره به‌دنبال انجام دقیق، به­موقع و با­کیفیت فعالیت‌ها و پروژه‌های خود هستند که این مهم اغلب از طریق مدیریت صحیح ابعاد مختلف فعالیت‌ها و پروژه‌ها انجام می‌پذیرد. مبحث انگیزش و پاداش کارکنان و مدیران در فعالیت‌های پروژه‌ای، بخشی از مدیریت منابع انسانی است که در این پژوهش به آن پرداخته شده است. در مدل ریاضی ارائه شده در این پژوهش برای تخصیص پاداش به هر فرد در هر پروژه سه مبنا در نظر گرفته شده است: اهمیت راهبردی پروژه؛ ارزیابی عملکرد پروژه و نقش فرد در پروژه. مدل ارائه­‌شده با استفاده از این مبانی و محدودیت‌های منابع سازمانی به هر فرد در هر پروژه پاداشی را تخصیص می‌دهد. نحوه محاسبه پاداش به شکلی است که ضمن در نظر گرفتن محدودیت‌های مالی، نخست، کارکنان را ترغیب به تعریف پروژه‌هایی می‌کند که هر چه بیشتر در راستای اهداف و راهبردهای سازمان باشند و دوم در اجرای پروژه‌ها آن­ها را ترغیب به تعهد به الزامات کمّی و کیفی پروژه می­کند. در پایان و طی یک مطالعه موردی، مدل در «شرکت ایران ارقام» اجرا شده و نتایج نشان از بهبود عملکرد پروژه‌های شرکت در حوزه‌های زمان، هزینه و کیفیت تحویل‌­شدنی‌ها دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a Mathematical Model for Periodic Projects Evaluation and Rewarding in Matrix Organizations (Case Study: Iran Argham Corporation)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Ferdosi Jahromi 1
  • Saeed Yaghoubi 2
1 * Ph.D Student, Allameh Tabtabaei University.
2 Associate Professor, Iran University of Science & Technology.
چکیده [English]

Organizations and companies are always looking for accurate, timely, and quality performance of their activities and projects, often through the proper management of different dimensions of activities and projects. The topic of motivation and reward of employees and managers in project activities is part of the human resource management discussed in this article. In the mathematical model of this paper, three bases are assigned to each individual reward in each project: project strategic importance, project performance evaluation, and individual role in the project. The model provided by these fundamentals and the limitations of organizational resources assigns each individual to each reward project. How to calculate reward in a way that takes into account financial constraints, first, encourages employees to define projects that are more in line with the goals and strategies of the organization, and second, encourages them to commit to the project's quantitative and qualitative requirements. At the end and via a case study, the model is implemented in Iran Argham and the results show the improvement of company projects' performance in terms of time, cost and quality of deliverables.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Project Human Resource Management
  • Motivation
  • Project Reward
  • Matrix Structure
  • Project Performance Evaluation

مراجع

  1. 1. Alavipour, S. R., & Arditi, D. (2019). Time-cost tradeoff analysis with minimized project financing cost. Automation in Construction, 98, 110-121.

    2. Amirkabiri, A. (2003). Strategy Management. second edition, Tehran: Negah Danesh publishers (In persian)

    3. Amoozadeh Mahriji, Hannan, Mokhtarzadeh, Nima, Radmand, Sara. (2017). Gray Fuzzy Ideal Planning Model to balance project time, cost, risk and quality. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 3(7), 47-80 (In persian)

    4. Arditi, D., Khisty, J., Yasamis, F. (1997). Incentive/disincentive provisions in highway contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), 302–307

    5. Baloi, D., Price, A.D.F. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 261–269

    6. Bonyadi Naeini, Ali, Kamfiroozi, Mohamad Hasan. (2014). A Systematic Study of the Role of Human Factors on Project Success with Shapley-Dimethyl Gray Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 4(2), 27-45 (In persian)

    7. Crawford, J. Kent (2006). Optimizing Human Capital with a Strategic Project Office. Florida: Auerbach Publications.

    8. Eriksson, P.E., Westerberg, M. (2011). Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (2), 197–208

    9. Feizi, M. (2006). Application of standard pmbok to evaluate project managers performance. Second International Project Management Conference (In persian)

    1. Ghasemi Sa'adat Abadi, A. (2016). Providing a rewarding project efficiency model based on the benefits of engineering machine users. Third International E-Conference on Commercialization, National Development and Engineering Sciences, Tehran (In persian)
    2. Haji Karimi, A., & Rangriz, H. (2001). Human Resources Management. Tehran: Trading Publishing Company (In persian)
    3. Haji Mir Arab, S. M., Bagherpour, M., & Naieni, H. (2012). Designing a final reward calculation and distribution system for projects in organizations with matrix structure. Third Executive Management Conference (In persian)
    4. Harris, F., McCaffer, R., Edum-Fotwe, F. (2006). Modern Construction Management. Six Edition. Oxford: Blackwell
    5. Hekmat shoaar, & Arabzade, G. (2011). Designing and developing a reward system and mechanization in the port and maritime department of Imam Khomeini Port. Didgah Journal, 7(3), 28-42 (In persian)
    6. Hellriegel, don, Slocum, john, woodman, Richard. (1995). Organizational behavior. New York: west publishing company
    7. Jaafari, A., (1996). Twinning time and cost in incentive-based contracts. Journal of Management in Engineering, 12(4), 62–72
    8. Jones, G. R., George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546.
    9. Kandula, S. R. (2006). Performance management: Strategies, interventions, drivers. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
    10. Kwak, Y.H., Smith, B.M. (2009). Managing risks in mega defense acquisition projects: performance, policy, and opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 27(8), 812–820
    11. Matthews, O., & Howell, G. A. (2005). Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting. Lean construction journal, 2(1), 46-61.
    12. Mehrabi, Ali, Rahimi, Farajollah, Salehi. Reza. (2017). Providing Performance-Based Multilevel Reward Pattern Using Promotional Method. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 7(3), 81-104 (In persian)
    13. Moghadam, E. K., Sharifi, M., Rafiee, S., & Chang, Y. K. (2020). Time–Cost–Quality Trade-Off in a Broiler Production Project Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms: A Case Study. Agriculture, 10(1), 2-18
    14. Namazi, M., & Sirani, M. (2005). Experimental Investigation of Important Structures in Determining Contracts, Indicators and Bonus Parameters of Corporate Managers in Iran. Accounting and Accounting Reviews, 36(11), 65-94 (In persian)
    15. Pahlavani, A., & Aslami, M. (2009). Implement a productivity-based reward system in the Bank of Industry and Mine. Sixth International Management Conference (In persian)
    16. Pheng, L.S., Teo, J.A. (2004). Implementing total quality management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(1), 815
    17. Rahmanniyay, F., & Yu, A. J. (2019). A multi-objective stochastic programming model for project-oriented human-resource management optimization. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 14(4), 231-239.
    18. Rison, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning in government. public and non-profit organizations. Translation by Mahdi khademi, Tehran: Ariana ghalam publishers (In persian)
    19. Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition. Project management journal, 44(3), e1-e1.
    20. Simons, R. (2013). Seven Strategic Questions. Translation by Masud soltani, Tehran: Ariana ghalam, (In persian)
    21. Stellingwerf, R., & Zandhuis, A. (2013). ISO 21500 Guidance on project management–A Pocket Guide. Van Haren.
    22. Tagizadeh Yazdi, Mohamadreza, Ghafouri, Saeed. (1395) A mathematical model for the problem of cost-time balance - environmental effects and solve it with metaheuristic algorithms of particle density and night cream, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 6(4), 97-121(In persian).
    23. Thomas, W. H., Lam, R. W., Nutt, D. J., & Thase, M. E. (2018). The basics of project evaluation and lessons learned. Productivity Press.
    24. Weiner, Bernard (1987). Human motivation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: California
    25. Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., & Li, A. (2019). Investigating the Effects of Reward Interdependence and Nonfinancial Incentives on NPD Collaboration in Diverse Project Teams. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 641–656.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار