تأثیر قابلیت یکپارچگی با تأمین‌کننده بر عملکرد شرکت با نقش میانجی چابکی سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشگاه گیلان.

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه گیلان.

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه گیلان.

چکیده

با توجه به افزایش رقابت میان شرکت­‌ها و پویایی محیط، شرکت­ها باید به سمت کسب و حفظ قابلیت­هایی مانند قابلیت‌­های پویا حرکت کنند که آن‌ها را قادر به سازگاری سریع با نیازهای جدید و کسب عملکرد برتر می‌کند. ازآنجاکه یکی از راه‌های دستیابی به مزیت رقابتی و عملکرد برتر یکپارچگی با تأمین‌کنندگان است، در این مقاله تأثیر قابلیت یکپارچگی با تأمین‌کننده به‌عنوان یک نوع قابلیت پویا که شامل سه قابلیت فرعی درک یکپارچگی، اجرای یکپارچگی و ارتقای یکپارچگی با تأمین­کننده است بر عملکرد شرکت بررسی شده است. به این دلیل که قابلیت یکپارچگی با تأمین‌­کننده می‌تواند از طریق وجود توانمندی‌­های دیگری در سازمان بر ارتقای عملکرد تأثیر داشته باشد؛ بنابراین نقش میانجی چابکی سازمانی نیز بررسی شده است. فرضیه­‌های پژوهش با استفاده از نمونه­‌ای شامل 80 شرکت تولیدی فعال واقع در شهر صنعتی رشت بررسی شد. روش پژوهش، توصیفی و از نوع پیمایشی بود و جمع­‌آوری داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه انجام شد. مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری و الگوریتم حداقل مربعات جزئی به‌منظور تحلیل داده ­ها به‌کار رفت. نتایج نشان ­می­‌دهد که قابلیت یکپارچگی با تأمین­‌کننده به‌صورت مستقیم و غیرمستقیم تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر عملکرد شرکت­‌ها دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Impact of Supplier Integration Capability on Firm Performance with the Mediating Role of Organizational Agility

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mostafa Ebrahimpour Azbari 1
  • Mahmoud Moradi 2
  • Niloofar Marzban Moghaddam 3
1 Assistant Professor, University of Guilan.
2 Assistant Professor, University of Guilan.
3 MA.Student, University of Guilan.
چکیده [English]

Increasing competition and dynamic environment, impose firms to gainand maintain dynamic capabilities that enable them to adapt quickly to new needs and obtain superior performance. Since integration with suppliers considers as important way to achieve a competitive advantage and superior performance, hence in this paper, the impact of the supplier integration capability (a dynamic capability which consists of sensing, seizing and transformation) on the firm performance has been investigated. Furthermore, as supplier integration capabilities can impact on performance through other capabilities, this paper explores the mediating role of organizational agility. The study is descriptive and data has been gathered from a sample of 80 active companies installed in Rasht Industrial Zone by using questionnaire.  For data analysis, structural equations modeling (SEM) and partial least squares (PLS) algorithm has been used. The results showed that the supplier integration capability has positive effect on firm performance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Supplier Integration Capability
  • Organizational Agility
  • Firm Performance
  • Dynamic Capability

مراجع

1. Benaroch, M. (2002). Managing information technology investment risk: A real options perspective. Journal of management information systems, 19(2), 43-84.
2. Bratić, D. (2011). Achieving a competitive advantage by SCM. IBIMA Bus. Rev. J, 2011, 1-13.
3. Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140.
4. Brusset, X. (2016). Does supply chain visibility enhance agility?. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 46-59.
5. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Soto-Acosta, P., & Wensley, A. K. (2015). Structured knowledge processes and firm performance: The role of organizational agility. Journal of Business Research.
6. Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial marketing management, 29(1), 37-44.
7. Chung, S., Lee, K. Y., & Kim, K. (2014). Job performance through mobile enterprise systems: The role of organizational agility, location independence, and task characteristics. Information & Management, 51(6), 605-617.
8. Danese, P. (2013). Supplier integration and company performance: a configurational view. Omega, 41(6), 1029-1041.
9. Davari, A., & Rezazadeh, A., (2013). Structural equation modeling software PLS. (2ND ED). Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi. (in persian)
10. Doayi, H., & Nikkhah Farokhani, Z., (2009). Operational performance and human resources evaluation of Karafarin insurance agancies in Khorasan with multiple attitude of DEA. Insurance journal, 24(95-96), 33-60. (in persian)
11. Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 254-279.
12. Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., & Jacobs, M. A. (2012). Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 137(2), 250-262.
13. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?. Strategic management journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
14. Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of operations management, 19(2), 185-200.
15. Hooshmandi Maher, M., Amiri, M., & Olfat, L., (2013). An integrated Model of supplier selection in supply chain: IT capabilities approach. Journal of industrial management prespective, 2(8), 91-116. (In persian)
16. Huang, H. C., Lai, M. C., & Lin, T. H. (2011). Aligning intangible assets to innovation in biopharmaceutical industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3827-3834.
17. Inman, R. A., Sale, R. S., Green, K. W., & Whitten, D. (2011). Agile manufacturing: relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 343-355.
18. Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002). Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function.
19. Leonidou, L. C., Leonidou, C. N., Fotiadis, T. A., & Zeriti, A. (2013). Resources and capabilities as drivers of hotel environmental marketing strategy: Implications for competitive advantage and performance. Tourism Management, 35, 94-110.
20. Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.
21. Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799.
22. Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., & Hua, Z. (2013). The impact of IT capabilities on firm performance: The mediating roles of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility. Decision Support Systems, 54(3), 1452-1462.
23. Loforte Ribeiro, F., & Timóteo Fernandes, M. (2010). Exploring agile methods in construction small and medium enterprises: a case study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 23(2), 161-180.
24. López-Nicolás, C., & Meroño-Cerdán, Á. L. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International journal of information management, 31(6), 502-509.
25. Mishra, A. N., Konana, P., & Barua, A. (2007). Antecedents and consequences of internet use in procurement: an empirical investigation of US manufacturing firms. Information Systems Research, 18(1), 103-120.
26. Mohaghar, A., & Sadeghi Moghaddam, M., (2012). Supply chain coordination in automotive industry: Grounded Theory approach. Journal of industrial management prespective, 1(4), 29-65. (in persian)
27. Molavi, B., Esmailian, M., & Ansari, R., (2012). Indentifying and ranking the drivers of organizational agility using FTOPSIS and Fractional Programming techniques. Journal of Industrial Management prespective, 2(5), 91-114. (in persian)
28. Narasimhan, R., Kim, S. W., & Tan, K. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of supply chain strategy typologies and relationships to performance. International Journal of Production Research, 46(18), 5231-5259.
29. Narayanan, S., Narasimhan, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 140-154.
30. Neely, A., Adams, C., & Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring business excellence, 5(2), 6-13.
31. Ngai, E. W., Chau, D. C., & Chan, T. L. A. (2011). Information technology, operational, and management competencies for supply chain agility: Findings from case studies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(3), 232-249.
32. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, 14(3), 179-191.
33. Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of management.
34. Sanjaghi, M. E., Farahi Bouzanjani, B., Hosseini Sarkhosh, M., & Haji Shafiee, J., (2012). The mediating effects of adaptability culture on the relationship between transformational leadership and organizational innovation. Improvement management, 5(3), 122-139. (in persian)
35. Shahaiee, B., (2006). Human dimension of organizational agility. Tadbir, 17(175), 21-24. (In persian)
36. Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction. International journal of production economics, 62(1), 7-22.
37. Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2006). The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: scale development and model testing. Journal of Operations Management, 24(2), 170-188.
38. Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.
39. Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. Mis Quarterly, 35(2), 463-486.
40. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
41. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
42. Vanpoucke, E., Vereecke, A., & Wetzels, M. (2014). Developing supplier integration capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of Operations Management, 32(7), 446-461.
43. Zuckerman, A., (2011). Supply chain management (Translated by: Naghizadeh, A., & Salehi, B.,). (Third ed). Shiraz: Termeh. (In persian)

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار