عوامل برون‌سازمانی مؤثر بر مدیریت دانش در زنجیره تأمین: رویکردی ترکیبی از تحلیل عاملی و مدل‌سازی ساختاری - تفسیری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استایار، دانشگاه سمنان.

2 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه سمنان.

3 عضو هیئت علمی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.

چکیده

یکی از ابعاد اثرگذار بر مدیریت دانش و فرآیندهای آن در زنجیره تأمین، عوامل برون‌سازمانی است که نسبت به عوامل درون‌سازمانی (راهبردهای سازمانی، فرهنگ سازمانی و یا ساختار سازمانی)، سهم بسیار کمتری از پژوهش‌های مدیریت دانش را به خود تخصیص داده است. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، ارائه مدلی برای عوامل برون‌سازمانی مؤثر بر مدیریت دانش در زنجیره تأمین صنعت خودروسازی است. این پژوهشِ کاربردی در زنجیره تأمین شرکت‌های «ایران‌خودرو» و «سایپا» و به‌صورتی پیمایشی صورت گرفته است. در این مدل برای عوامل برون‌سازمانی مؤثر بر مدیریت دانش در زنجیره تأمین صنعت خودرو، چهار بُعد کلیدی پیشنهاد شد.؛ سپس از طریق روش مدل‌سازی ساختاری ـ تفسیری، مدل سطح‌بندی‌شده پژوهش مشخص شد و با استفاده از تکنیک تحلیل عاملی تأییدی، شاخص‌های هر یک از ابعاد در سطوح مختلف مدل ساختاری تفسیری شناسایی شدند. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان داد که در میان این عوامل، محیط تخصصی صنعت و راهبرد زنجیره تأمین در بالاترین سطح قرار گرفته است و فرهنگ زنجیره تأمین و عوامل کلان محیطی در سطح دوم مدل معرفی‌شده قرار می‌گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Extra-Organizational Factors Influencing Knowledge Management in Supply Chain: A Combinational Approach of Factor Analysis and Interpretive Structural Modeling

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohsen Shafiei Nikabadi 1
  • Rayhane Naderi 2
  • Hamid Tajik 3
1 Assistant Professor, Semnan University.
2 Ph.D Candidate, Semnan University.
3 Faculty Member, Islamic Azad University.
چکیده [English]

Extra-organizational factors are among impressive aspects on knowledge management and its processes in supply chain, but the relevant literature suffers from lack of studies about Extra-organizational factors compared with intra-organizational factors. The main Purpose of this research is to provide a model for extra-organizational factors effective on knowledge management in supply chain of automotive industry. This research is conducted by survey method in supply chains of Iran Khodro and SAIPA companies. In this model, four key elements were suggested for extra-organizational factors effective on knowledge management in supply chain of automotive industry. Then, through Interpretive Structural Modeling, graded model of the study was determined. Afterward, through Confirmative Factor Analysis, indicators of each aspect in different levels of interpretive structural model were defined. Research findings showed that, professional environment of industry and Supply Chain Strategy are in the highest level, then Supply Chain Culture and macro-environmental factors are in the second level of the introduced model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge Management
  • Supply Chain؛ Supply Chain Strategy؛ Professional Environment of Industry؛ Interpretive Structural Modeling

مراجع

1. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial marketing management, 36(4), 443-457.
2. Albescu, F., Pugna, I., & Paraschiv, D. (2008). Business intelligence & knowledge management–Technological support for strategic management in the knowledge based economy. Revista Informatica Economică, 4(48), 5-12.
3. Arabi, SM. (2013).Strategic Planning H&book. 7th Edition. Cultural Research Office, Tehran.       
4. Azar, A., Khosravani, F., Jalali, R. (2013). Soft Operational Research. Industrial Management Publication, Tehran, (In Persian).
5. Bigliardi, B., Galati, F., & Petroni, A. (2014). How to effectively manage knowledge in the construction industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 18(3), 57-72.
6. Buckley, P. J., & Carter, M. J. (2002). Process & structure in knowledge management practices of British & US multinational enterprises. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 29-48.
7. Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage & firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163-180.
8. Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall publication.
9. David, F. R. (1997), Strategic management, Prentice Hall, UK.
10. Eris, D, E., & Yasar, O. (2007), Supply Chain in the New Economy: an Approach based on Knowledge Management, Proceedings of European & Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2007 (EMCIS2007), June 24-26 2007, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Spain www.emcis.org.
11. Faisal, M.N., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R., (2006), Supply Chain Risk Mitigation: Modeling the Enablers, Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 535-552.
12. Farsijani, H., Feizi, K., Shafiei Nikabadi, M. (2011) The Impact of Industry’s Competitive Factors On Knowledge Applications for Improving Performance of Supply Chain in Automobile Industry. Journal of Business Management Perspective, 6 (39), 71-99 (In Persion).
13. Firozjayan, AA., Firozjayan, M., Hashemi Petroudi, SH., Gholaamrezazadeh, F. (2013). Applying Techniques of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) in Tourism Studies (A Pathological Approach). Journal of tourism Planning & Development, 2(6), 129-159 (In Persion).           
14. Fong, P. S., & Choi, S. K. (2009). The processes of knowledge management in professional services firms in the construction industry: a critical assessment of both theory & practice. Journal of Knowledge management, 13(2), 110-126.
15. Hanafizadeh, P. & Shafiei Nikabadi, M. (2011), Framework for selecting an Appropriate E-Business Model in Managerial Holding Companies, Case Study: Iran Khodro, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 24 (3), 237-267.
16. Hataminasab, H. zanjirchi, M. (2011). Underlying and Process Role of Knowledge Management in Agilizing the Country's Textile Industry, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, (1), 135-151, (In Persian).
17. Huang, J. J., Tzeng, G. H., & Ong, C. S. (2005). Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(6), 755-767.
18. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Arrfelt, M., (2007), Strategic Supply Chain Management: Improving Performance through a Culture of Competitiveness & Knowledge Development, Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1035-1052.
19. Jafarnejad, A., Safari, H., Mohseni, M. (2015). Analysis of the relationship between supply chain management paradigms activities & performance measures by Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 5 (18), (In Persian).
20. Jayant, A., & Azhar, M. (2014). Analysis of the barriers for implementing green supply chain management (GSCM) practices: an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) Approach. Procedia Engineering, 97, 2157-2166.
21. Kumar, P., Shankar, R., & Yadav, S. S., (2008), Flexibility in Global Supply Chain: Modeling the enablers, Journal of Modeling in Management, 3(3), pp: 277-297.
22. Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Liu, H. (2011). Co-opetition, distributor's entrepreneurial orientation & manufacturer's knowledge acquisition: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 128-142.
23. Liao, C., Chuang, S. H., & To, P. L. (2011). How knowledge management mediates the relationship between environment and organizational structure. Journal of business research, 64(7), 728-736.
24. Luthra, S., Garg, D., & Haleem, A. (2015). An analysis of interactions among critical success factors to implement green supply chain management towards sustainability: An Indian perspective. Resources Policy, 46, 37-50.
25. Massingham, P. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1–managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075-1100.
26. Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A., & Geng, Y. (2013). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 283-297.
27. McAdam, R., & McCreedy, S., (1999), the Process of Knowledge Management within Organizations: a Critical Assessment of both Theory & Practice, Knowledge & Process Management, 6(2), 101-113.
28. Moffett, S., McAdam, R., & Parkinson, S., (2003), an empirical analysis of Knowledge Management applications, Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(3), pp: 6-26.
29. Momeni, M., (2012), Statistical Analysis using SPSS (7th Edition), Tehran: Ketabeno Publication.
30. Muduli, K., Govindan, K., Barve, A., Kannan, D., & Geng, Y. (2013). Role of behavioural factors in green supply chain management implementation in Indian mining industries. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 76, 50-60.
31. Olfat, L., ShahriariNia, A. (2014). Interpretive Structural Modeling of Effective Factors of Partner Selection in Agile Supply Chain. Production & Operations Management, 5 (2), 109-128, (In Persian).
32. Pandey, V. C., & Garg, S. (2009), Analysis of Interaction among the enablers of Agility in Supply Chain, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 6(1), 99-114.
33. Pearce, J. & Robinson, R. (2007), Strategic Management, Mc Graw-Hill, NY.
34. Petrusa-Ortega, E. M., Zaragoza-Saez, P., & Claver-Cortes, E., (2010), Can formalization, complexity, & centralization influence knowledge performance? Journal of Business Research, 63, 310–320.
35. Pishdar, M., Toloun, M. R. S. H., Zamani, S., & Farzianpour, F. (2014). Development of factors effective in the success of green supply chain management. American Journal of Agricultural & Biological Sciences, 9(1), 33.
36. Porter, M. E. (1998), Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries & competitors, FREE Press, NY.
37. Preece, M. (2015). Managing Information & Knowledge in Service Industries. Sustaining Competitive Advantage Via Business Intelligence, Knowledge Management, & System Dynamics (Advances in Business Marketing & Purchasing, Volume 22B) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 22, 3-154.
38. Rajabzadeh, A., Keramatpanah, M., Shahroudi, K., Keramatpanah, A. (2015). Comparative Modeling of Supply Chain Using Interpretive Structural Modeling & DEMATEL. Organizational Resources Management Research, 5 (2), 49-71, (In Persian).
39. Ramezanian, MR., Moradi, M., Soltani., Fatemeh .(2015). Cultural Interactivity Barriers Analysis in Automotive Supply Chain by using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 13 (2), 369-391.
40. Roh, J. J., Hong, P., & Park, Y., (2008), Organizational culture & supply chain strategy: a framework for effective information flows, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21 (4), 361-376.
41. Rosu, M. S., Dragoi, G., & Guran, M., (2009), A Knowledge Management Scenario to Support Knowledge Applications Development in Small & Medium Enterprises, Advances in Electrical & Computer Engineering, 9(1), 8-15.
42. Sahney, S., Banwet, D. W., & Karunes, S., (2008), An Integrated Framework of Indices for Quality Management in Education: a faculty Perspective, the TQM Journal, 20(5), 502-519.
 43. Sangari, M. S., Hosnavi, R., & Zahedi, M. R. (2015). The impact of knowledge management processes on supply chain performance: An empirical study. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(3), 603-626.
44. Segars, A. H., & Grove, V., (1993), Re-examining Ease of Use & Usefulness: A confirmatory Factor Analysis, MIS Quarterly, 17 (4), 517-525.
45. Shafiei Nikabadi, M., Feizi, K., Olfat, L., Taghavi Fard, MT. (2012). Multidimensional construct to explain the impact of organizational culture & the culture of the supply chain on transmission, sharing & distribution of knowledge in the automotive industry supply chain with an emphasis on improving supply chain performance. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science & Technology, 28 (1), 103-127 (In Persian).
46. Shojaei, P. (2016). Modeling obstacles to the implementation of knowledge management in the supply chain with an integrated approach of Interpretive Structural Modeling & fuzzy MICMAC. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 6 (21), (In Persian).       
47. Singh, M.D., Shankar, R., Narain, R., & Agarwal, A., (2003), An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries, Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1(1), 28-40.
48. Singh, R.K., Garg, S.K., & Deshmukh, S.G.,(2007), Interpretive of structural modeling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs, International Journal of Productivity & Quality Management, 2(4), 423-440.
49. Soni, G., & Kodali, R., (2011), the strategic fit between competitive strategy & supply chain strategy in Indian manufacturing industry: an empirical approach, Measuring Business Excellence, 15 (2), 70-89.
50. Talib. F., (2011), The Barriers To Total Quality Management Implementation Using Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(4), 563-587.
51. Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., & Shankar, R. (2006). Development of a balanced scorecard: an integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) & analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 56(1), 25-59.
52. Tseng, M. (2013).Modeling sustainable production indicators with linguistic preferences, Journal of Cleaner Production, 40(0): 46-56
53. Tseng, S-M., (2008), Knowledge management system performance measure index, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 734–745.
54. Vaccarro, A., Parente, R., & Veloso, M. F., (2010), Knowledge Management Tools, Inter Organizational Relationships, Innovation & Firm Performance, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 1076–1089.
55. Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2015). Analysis of critical success factors of humanitarian supply chain: An application of Interpretive Structural Modeling. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 213-225.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار