نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

2 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

چکیده

ریسک بالای شکست در پروژه ­های طراحی و ضعف در تحقق فرآیند بهینه توسعه محصولات جدید در صنعت خودروسازی از یک سو و ناکارآمدی این حوزه در شناسایی و الگوسازی نظام طراحی محصولات جدید از سوی دیگر، در زمره مهم‌ترین مسائل پیش روی حوزه صنعت خودرو قرار دارد. این در حالی است که امکان بومی‌سازی و ترازسنجی الگوهای برتر موجود در این خصوص، با چالش ­ها و مسائل متعددی روبه‌رو است. از این ‌رو هدف از ارائه این پژوهش طراحی و تبیین الگوی توسعه محصول جدید در صنایع خودروسازی کشور است. این پژوهش با بهره ­گیری از رویکرد توسعه­ای-کاربردی، راهبرد داده ­بنیاد را دنبال کرده و با بهره­ گیری از الگوی دلفی، مدل پیشنهادی توسط خبرگان اعتبارسنجی شده است. نتایج پژوهش حاکی از وجود یک الگوی چهار­مرحله­ ای مشتمل بر ایده ­پردازی، ارزیابی فنی و بازار، غربالگری و انتخاب طرح در طراحی محصولات جدید است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

New Product Development Model in the Iran Automotive Industry

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akbar Alem Tabriz 1
  • Mohammad Reza Hamidizadeh 1
  • Behrooz Dorri Nokarani 1
  • Mohsen Mohammadi Pelarati 2

1 Professor, Shahid Beheshti University.

2 Ph.D. Student, Shahid Beheshti University.

چکیده [English]


The high risk of failure in design projects and weaknesses in implementing the optimal process for the development of new products in the automotive industry on the one hand and the inefficiency of this area in identifying and modeling the design of new products on the other hand are among the most important issues facing the automotive industry. However, the possibility of localizing and balancing the prevailing patterns in this regard faces many challenges and issues. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to design and explain the new product development model in the Iran automotive industry. Using development-applicable approach, this research has followed the ground theory strategy and validated by the experts using the Delphi model. The results of the research indicate a four-stage model including ideology, technical and market evaluation, screening and design selection in the design of new products.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • New Product Development
  • Organizational Stakeholders
  • Grounded Theory
  • Automotive Industry
1. Alam Tabriz, A. & Sobhani Fard, Y. (2013). Production and Operations Management. Tehran: University Press.
2. Barczak, G., Griffin, A. & Kahn, K. (2009). PERSPECTIVE: Trends and Drivers of Success in NPD Practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA Best Practices Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3-23.
3. Campbell, R. G. & Roth, E. S. (2003). Integrated Product Design and Manufacturing Using Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing. NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
4. Carson, S. J. (2007). When to Give Up Control of Outsourced New Product Development. Journal of Marketing, 49-66.
5. Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 44-61.
6. Cooper, R. G. (1994). New products: the factors that drive success. International Marketing Review, 78-93.
7. Cooper, R. G. (2003). Formula for success in new product development. Marketing Management, 65-83.
8. Cooper, R. G. & Edgett, S. J. (2003). Overcoming the Current Crunch in NPD Resources. NY: Product Development Institute Inc.
9. Cunha, M. & Gomes, J. (2003). Order and Disorder in Product Innovation Models. Journal of Creativity and Innovation Management, 269-288.
10. Franke, N., Keinz, P. & Schreier, M. (2008). Complementing Mass Customization Toolkits with User Communities: How Peer Input Improves Customer Self-Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 546-559.
11. Gopalakrishnan, M., Libby, T. & Samuels, J. (2015). The effect of cost goal speciality and new product development process on cost reduction performance. Accounting, Organizations, and society, 1-11.
12. Farsijani, H., Dehghan. E. (2016). Explaining the performance of the organization's performance in the product in world class. Industrial Management Perspective, 45-65.
13. Lantos, G., Brady, D. & McCaskey, P. (2009). New product development: an overlooked but critical course. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 425-436.
14. Lynn, G., Akgün, A. & Keskin, H. (2003). Accelerated learning in new product development teams. European Journal of Innovation Management, 201-212.
15. Naeiji, J. M. (2012). Designing a Process Pattern for Developing Software Products with an Interpretative Structural Modeling Approach. Industrial Management Perspective, 44-85.
16. Parker, H., & Brey, Z. (2015). Collaboration costs and new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 1653-1656.
17. Process Classification Framework (PCF). Version 4.0. NY: American Productivity & Quality Center (APQC), (2015).
18. Mohaghar, A, Hashemi P, S,H,. Talaei, H.R; (2016), Modeling the dynamically based dynamic modeling, System hierarchy approach, Industrial Management Perspective, 9-36.
19. Rosenau, M. D. (2000). Successful Product Development, Speeding from Opportunity to Profit. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2008). Principles of Qualitative Research Methodology: The Basic Theory, Procedures and Practices, Translation by Biouk Mohammadi. Tehran: Research Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.