ارائه الگوی پاداش چندسطحی مبتنی بر عملکرد با استفاده از روش پرومتی اصلاح شده

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.

2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر که از لحاظ هدف توسعه­ ای، از لحاظ گردآوری داده‌ها، توصیفی-پیمایشی و از نظر روش تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده ­ها، ریاضی-تحلیلی است،  با هدف ارائه الگوی پاداش چندسطحی مبتنی بر عملکرد صورت گرفته است. با توجه به تعداد زیاد رو ش­های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره در حل مسائل تصمی م­گیری و همچنین مشکلات مربوط به تعداد زیاد معیارها در فرایند تصمیم­گیری، در این پژوهش از الگوی چندبخشی جدیدی به‌منظور غلبه بر کاستی­ های موجود در الگوهای رایج استفاده شده است. برای توسعه مدل مناسب تصمیم‌گیری نیز از روش جدید پرومتی اصلاح ­شده استفاده شده است که تابع برتری آن برای تابع هم‌سطح به‌عنوان نوآوری در اجرای مدل چندبخشی بسط داده ‌شده است. در پایان مدل چندبخشی توسعه داده‌شده به‌صورت کاربردی با استفاده از داده­ های به‌‌دست‌آمده از «شرکت پایانه ­های نفتی ایران» موردبررسی قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Representing a Multi-Level Performance-based Rewarding Model Using Adjusted PROMETHEE Technique

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Mehrabi 1
  • Faraj Allah Rahimi 1
  • Reza Salehi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
2 MSc, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
چکیده [English]

This is a developmental research in terms of purpose, In terms of data collecting, it's a descriptive-survey and in terms of analyzing data, it's considered as a mathematical-analytic research method. This paper aims to provide a multi-level performance-based rewarding approach. In spite of a large number of multi-criteria techniques and methods and large number of criteria in the decision-making process, this research introduced a new multilevel model in order to overcome the shortcomings of previous models. Based on a modified PROMETHEE method, the preference functions has been extended for level function as the major innovation of the research. Finally, the proposed multilevel model has applied and examined using a data collection obtained from Iranian Oil Terminals Company.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Rewarding
  • Performance Evaluation
  • Adjusted Promethee
  • Iranian Oil Terminals Company

مراجع

1. Aghai, M., Fazli, S. (2012). Applying the DEMATEL and ANP combination approach to selecting the appropriate maintenance strategy (Case study: automotive industry enterprises). Industrial management perspective. 6: 89-107.
2. Aksakal, E., & Dağdeviren, M. (2014). Analyzing Reward Management Framework with Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 147: 147-152.‏
3. Amirkhani, T., Alikhani, F. (2015). Key Indicators of Organizational Performance Evaluation and Productivity Improvement: Balanced Scorecard Approach. Industrial management perspective, 20: 101-118.
4. Ayağ, Z., & Samanlioglu, F. (2016). An intelligent approach to supplier evaluation in automotive sector. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 27(4): 889-903.‏
5. Bentes, A. V., Carneiro, J., da Silva, J. F., & Kimura, H. (2012). Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP. Journal of business research, 65(12): 1790-1799.‏
6. Bhattacharya, S., & Mukherjee, P. (2009). Rewards as a key to employee engagement: A comparative study on IT professionals. ASBM Journal of Management, 2(1): 160-175.
7. Bouri, A., Martel, J. M., & Chabchoub, H. (2002). A multi‐criterion approach for selecting attractive portfolio. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4‐5): 269-277.
8. Bruggeman, W., & Decoene, V. (2002). An empirical study of the influence of Balanced Scorecard-based variable remuneration on the performance motivation of operating managers.‏
9. Crabtree, A. D., & DeBusk, G. K. (2008). The effects of adopting the balanced scorecard on shareholder returns. Advances in Accounting, 24(1): 8-15.‏
10. Downes, P. E., & Choi, D. (2014). Employee reactions to pay dispersion: A typology of existing research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1): 53-66.‏
11. Fich, E. M., Rice, E. M., & Tran, A. L. (2016). Contractual revisions in compensation: Evidence from merger bonuses to target CEOs. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2): 338-368.
12. Giancola, L. F. (2009). Is Total Rewards a Passing Fad? Compensation & Benefits Review, 41(4): 29-35.
13. Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (2014). Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1): 1-5.‏
14. Hanine, M., Boutkhoum, O., Agouti, T., & Tikniouine, A. (2016). A new integrated methodology using modified Delphi-fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE for Geospatial Business Intelligence selection. Information Systems and e-Business Management: 1-29.‏
15. Jacobsen, DI & Thorsvik, J. (2008). Hur moderna organisationer fungerar. Fagbokforlaget, Bergen. Kent, ML, & Taylor, M: 10-20.‏
16. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard business review, 83(7): 172.‏
17. Keramati, A., & Shapouri, F. (2016). Multidimensional appraisal of customer relationship management: integrating balanced scorecard and multi criteria decision making approaches. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 14(2): 217-251.
18. Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2015). Selecting “The Best” ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5): 2343-2352.‏
19. Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological science in the public interest, 7(3): 77-124.‏
20. Ladley, D., Wilkinson, I., & Young, L. (2015). The impact of individual versus group rewards on work group performance and cooperation: A computational social science approach. Journal of Business Research, 68(11): 2412-2425.‏
21. Larkin, I., Pierce, L., & Gino, F. (2012). The psychological costs of pay‐for‐performance: Implications for the strategic compensation of employees. Strategic Management Journal, 33(10): 1194-1214.‏
22. Law, C. C., & Law, C. C. (2016). Using bonus and awards for motivating project employees. Human Resource Management International Digest, 24(7): 4-7.‏
23. Lei, J. (2011, May). Supplier evaluation via AHP and PROMETHEE. In E-Business and E-Government (ICEE), 2011 International Conference on: 1-4). IEEE.‏
24. Marasović, B., & Babić, Z. (2011). Two-step multi-criteria model for selecting optimal portfolio. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1): 58-66.‏
25. Mareschal, B., Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis (No. 2013/9305). ULB--Universite Libre de Bruxelles: 477–490.‏
26. Matsson, A., & Dahlqvist, A. (2013). The impact of extrinsic and intrinsic rewards on employees’ motivation – A case study of an insurance company:‏ 1-46.
27. Murat, S., Kazan, H., & Coskun, S. S. (2015). An application for measuring performance quality of schools by using the PROMETHEE multi-criteria decision making method. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195: 729-738.‏
28. Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. E. (2008). Employee motivation. Harvard business review, 86(7/8): 78-84.‏
29. Ranjan, R., Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2016). Performance evaluation of Indian states in tourism using an integrated PROMETHEE-GAIA approach. Opsearch, 53(1): 63-84.‏
30. Salehi, R. (2016). Provide a performance-based variable rewarding framework at Iran Oil Terminals Company. MSc. Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
31. Salehi-Sedghiani, J., Jafarian, A., Shafiei-Nikabadi, M. (2012). The Performance Evaluation Framework for 5s Supervised Units (using the DEA Approach). Industrial Management Perspective, 6: 115-129.
32. Schweiker, M., & Groß, M. (2016). Organizational environments and bonus payments: Rent destruction or rent sharing? Research in Social Stratification and Mobility: 1-32.
33. Varmazyar, M., Dehghanbaghi, M., & Afkhami, M. (2016). A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach. Evaluation and program planning, 58: 125-140.‏
34. Živković, Ž,. Nikolić, D., Savić, M., Djordjević, P., & Mihajlović, I. (2017). Prioritizing Strategic Goals in Higher Education Organizations by Using a SWOT–PROMETHEE/GAIA–GDSS Model. Group Decision and Negotiation: 1-18.‏
35. Zmitri, R., Martel, J. M., & Dumas, Y. (1998). Un indice multicritere de sante financiere pour les succursales bancaires. Revue FINECO, Finance, Economie, Comptabilite, 8(2): 107-121.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار