رویکردی ترکیبی در ارزیابی عوامل دخیل در رقابت‌پذیری زنجیره تأمین صنعت لاستیک‌سازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.

2 استادیار، دانشگاه ولی‌عصر (عج) رفسنجان.

3 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران.

چکیده

هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، ارزیابی عوامل دخیل در رقابت­ پذیری زنجیره­ تأمین در صنعت لاستیک‌ سازی است. بدین‌منظور ابتدا با مروری گسترده مبانی نظری رقابت ­پذیری، مؤلفه­ ها شناسایی و مدل مفهومی پژوهش ارائه شد. داده ­ها از مدیران و خبرگان 5 شرکت ایرانی تولیدکننده لاستیک جمع­ آوری شد. به­ منظور تحلیل داده­ ها و آزمون مدل پیشنهادی در فاز آماری پژوهش از روش حدأقل مربعات جزئی استفاده شده و به­ منظور اولویت­ بندی عوامل مؤثر در رقابت­ پذیری زنجیره ­تأمین، رویکردی ترکیبی اتخاذ شده و از تلفیق ضرایب مسیر حاصل از تکنیک PLS و اوزان حاصل از تکنیک­ های BWM و FAHP بهره گرفته‌ شده است. نتایج حاصل از فاز آماری پژوهش حاکی از تأثیر مثبت و معنادار «شراکت زنجیره تأمین»، «قابلیت ­های فرآیندی مدیریت دانش»، «مدیریت زنجیره ­تأمین سبز» و «بخش­ بندی تأمین‌کنندگان» بر رقابت­ پذیری زنجیره ­تأمین است. نتایج حاصل از اولویت ­بندی عوامل مؤثر در رقابت‌پذیری زنجیره ­تأمین با استفاده از روش ­های MCDM نشان داد که «شراکت در سرمایه­ گذاری مالی» مهم­ترین عامل در رقابت ­پذیری زنجیره ­تأمین است و پس از آن، «کاربرد دانش» و «شراکت در R&D» در اولویت­های دوم و سوم قرار دارند. در پایان، برخی استراتژی ­های کاربردی برای مدیران، مورد بحث و بررسی قرار گرفته و پیشنهادهایی برای پژوهش­ های آتی ارائه شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Hybrid Approach to Asses Contributing Factors in Supply Chain Competitiveness in Rubber Industry

نویسندگان [English]

  • Saeid Sadeghi Darvazeh 1
  • Abbas Shoul 2
  • Neda Rasouli 3
1 Ph.D Student, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
2 Assistant Professor, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan.
3 M.A., University of Tehran.
چکیده [English]

     The main aim of this research is to asses contributing factors in supply chain competitiveness in rubber industry. To this point, first, using the extended review in literature of competitiveness, components were identified and conceptual model of research was presented. Data were collected from managers and experts of 5 Iranian rubber manufacturers. To analyze the data and testing the proposed model in statistical phase of research, partial least squares (PLS) method, and to prioritizing contributing factors in supply chain competitiveness a hybrid approach was used and Path coefficients of PLS and weights of BWM and FUZZY AHP were combined. The results of statistical phase of research indicate that “supply chain partnership”, “knowledge management process capability”, “green supply chain management”, and “supplier segmentation” have a significant positive effect on supply chain competitiveness. The results of prioritizing contributing factors in supply chain competitiveness using MCDM methods indicate that “partnership in finance” is the most important factor in supply chain competitiveness and after that, “knowledge application” and “partnership in R&D” were located in second and third priority. Finally some practical strategies for managers are discussed and some suggestions for future research are provided.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Supply Chain
  • Competitiveness
  • Rubber Industry
  • Partial Least Squares
  • Best-Worst Method
  • Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

مراجع

  1. Ambashta, A., & Momaya, K. (2002). Competitive of Firms: Review of Theory, Frameworks, and Models. Singapore Management Review, 26(1).
  2. Azar, A., Mirfakhraddiny, S. H. & Anvari Rostamy, A. A. (2009). Comprative Study of Data Analysis in Six Sigma Statistical Tools and MADM techniques. Management Research in Iran, 4(59), 1-35 (In Persian).
  3. Ceptureanu, S. I. (2015). Competitiveness of SMES. Business Excellence and Management Review, 5(2), 55-67.
  4. Chang. D.Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649-655.
  5. Chuang, S.H. (2004). A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation. Expert Systems with Applications, 27(3), 459-65.
  6. Dess, Gregory, G., & Lumpkin, Tom, G. (2003). Strategic Management. Mc GrawHill.
  7. Ellram, L. M., & Cooper, M. C. (1990). Supply chain management, partnership, and the shipper-third party relationship. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1(2), 1-10.
  8. Esmaeilian, M, Hemmatgir, H & Ghaenian, R. (2018). Designing and implementing suppliers evaluating process in supplier relationship management system (case study: Mobarake Steel Co.), Industrial Management Perspective, 8(31), 37-61 (In Persian).
  9. Esposito-Vinzi, V., Wynne, W., Chin W.W., Henseler, J. & Wang, H. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, Methods and Applications. New York: Springer Verlag.
  10. Farinha, L., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2019). Following the Footprints of SME Competitiveness in a High-Technology Sector. In Knowledge, Innovation and Sustainable Development in Organizations (pp. 77-95). Springer, Cham.
  11. Gogus, O., & Boucher, T. O. (1997). A consistency test for rational weights in multi-criterion decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons. Fuzzy sets and Systems, 86(2), 129-138.
  12. Horvath, L. (2001). Collaboration: the key to value creation in supply chain management. Supply chain management: an international journal, 6(5), 205-207.
  13. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204.
  14. Jafanezhad Chaghoushi, A, Kazemi, Aliye & Arab, A. (2017). Identifying and prioritizing suppliers resilient factors based on BWM, Industrial Management Perspective, 23, 159-187 (In Persian).
  15. Khakpour, A., Kazemi, M., Tavakkoli, A., & Fazli, S. (2018). Designing Communication Model between Effective Factors on Competitiveness of SMEs Using ISM. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 10.
  16. Lambert, D. M., & M. A. Schwieterman. (2012). Supplier Relationship Management as a Macro Business Process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(3), 337–352.
  17. Li, S., & Lin, B. (2006). Accessing information sharing and information quality in supply chain management. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1641-1656.
  18. Liu, S., Sandra, et al, (2003). Market-oriented Organizations in an Emerging Economy, A Study of Missing Links. Journal of Business Research, 56, 481-491.
  19. Lummus, R. R., & Vokurka, R. J. (1999). Defining supply chain management: a historical perspective and practical guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(1), 11-17.
  20. Ma, H. (1999). Anatomy of competitive advantage: a SELECT framework. Management Decision, 37(9), 709-718.
  21. McGahan, Anita, M., Silverman, Brian, S. (2006). Profitting from Technilogical Innovation by Others: The Effect of Competitor Patenting on Firm Value. Research Policy, 35(8), 1222-1242.
  22. Mehregan, M. R, Asghari Zadeh, E. & Safari, H. (2014). Model designed to assess the firm-level competitiveness using structural equation modeling (case study: the National Petrochemical Companies of Iran). Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 12(46), 1-36 (In Persian).
  23. Mentzer, J. T., Min, S., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2000). The Nature of Interfirm Partnering in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Retailing, 76(4), 549–568.
  24. Moazzez, H. & Azizi, J. (2016). Developing the Green Supply Chain Management Model of Yang in Cinere Company. Industrial Management Journal, 2, 309-332 (In Persian).
  25. Mohammadi, V; Valipour, P & Mohammadi, M. (2016). Influential Factors on the Competitiveness of Textile Industry Clusters. Journal of Textile Science and Technology, 6(1), 31-41 (In Persian).
  26. Momaya, K., (1998). Evaluating International Competitiveness at the Industry Level. Vikalpa, 23(2), April-June.
  27. Murths, T. P., et al. (1998). Country Capabilities and the Strategic State: How National Political Institutions Affect MNC Strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 113-129.
  28. O'Connor, N. G., Yang, Z., & Jiang, L. (2018). Challenges in gaining supply chain competitiveness: Supplier response strategies and determinants. Industrial Marketing Management, 72, 138-151.
  29. Rasekhi, S; M. T. Gilak & Jabbari, V. (2016). Determinant Factors of Iran’s Competitiveness in Agriculture Sector. Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 8(30), 17-45 (In Persian).
  30. Rezaei & Ortt (2012). Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 225, 75–84
  31. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega (United Kingdom), 53, 49-57.
  32. Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
  33. Rezaei, Ortt & Trott. (2014). How SMEs can benefit from supply chain partnerships. International Journal of Production Research, 53(5), 1527-1543.
  34. Rezai Dolat Abadi, H. (2006). Designing effectiveness model of market orientation on business performance according to the marketing capabilities. PhD thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University, School of Management (In Persian).
  35. Rivard & Huff. (1988). Factors of success for End-User computing. Communications of the ACM, 31(5), 552-561.
  36. Samir. K. Srivastva (2007). Green Supply-Chain management: A state-of the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
  37. Shaabani, E., Ahmadi, H. & Yazdani, H. R. (2012). Do interactions among elements of knowledge management lead to acquiring core competencies? Business Strategy Series, 13(6), 307-322.
  38. Shafiei Nik-Abadi, M, Naderi, R & Tajik, H. (2017). Outsourcing factors affecting knowledge management in supply chain: Factor analysis and structural interpretive modeling hybrid approach, Industrial Management Perspective, 8(31), 131-157 (In Persian).
  39. Shurchuluu, P. (2002). National productivity and competitive strategies for the new millennium. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(6), 408-414.
  40. Wilson, L. A., & Boyle, E. (2006). Interorganisational collaboration at UK world heritage sites. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(6), 501-523.
  41. Wu, Y., Xiao, X., & Song, Z. (2017). Competitiveness analysis of coal industry in China: A diamond model study. Resources Policy, 52, 39-53.
  42. Yang, C. S., Lu, C. S., Haider, J. J., & Marlow, P. B. (2013). The effect of green supply chain management on green performance and firm competitiveness in the context of container shipping in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 55, 55-73.
  43. Zand Hesami, H, Ashtiani Pour, Z. & Pour Khalil, N. (2014). Evaluating the impact of knowledge management dimensions on improving the competitiveness of SME's. Industrial Management Journal, 9, 27-42 (In Persian).

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار