ارائه رویکرد دومرحله‌ای پویا برای طراحی استراتژی توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه اصفهان.

2 دانشیار، دانشگاه اصفهان.

چکیده

بخش‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان، پایه و اساس تصمیمات مدیران زنجیره تأمین با هدف مدیریت و توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان است. هدف پژوهش حاضر ارائه رویکردی پویا برای طراحی استراتژی مدیریت و توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان است. در این پژوهش به‌دلیل اینکه علاوه بر ویژگی‌های تأمین‌کنندگان، ویژگی‌های اقلام خرید در طراحی این استراتژی‌ها نقش مهمی دارد، از رویکردی دومرحله‌ای استفاده شده است. در مرحله نخست، اقلام خرید بر اساس معیارهای مناسب و با رویکرد پرتفولیو طبقه‌بندی می‌شوند؛ سپس در مرحله دوم، تأمین‌کنندگان هر طبقه از اقلام خرید بر اساس دو بُعد توانمندی و تمایل و معیارهای متناسب با هر طبقه از اقلام خرید در این دو بعُد بخش‌بندی می‌شوند. درنهایت برای هر بخش از تأمین‌کنندگان در هر طبقه از اقلام خرید استراتژی‌های مناسب مدیریت و توسعه تأمین‌کنندگان طراحی خواهد شد. در طبقه‌بندی اقلام خرید و بخش‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان ابتدا معیارهای مناسب بررسی‌شده از مبانی نظری پژوهش با روش دلفی تعیین می‌شوند؛ سپس وزن معیارها با روش بهترین ـ بدترین (BWM) به­‌دست می‌آید و در ادامه با استفاده از تکنیک‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره، اقلام خرید در طبقه‌ها و تأمین‌کنندگان در بخش‌های مرتبط با خود موقعیت‌یابی می‌شوند. درنهایت این روش برای اقلام خرید و تأمین‌کنندگان در یک شرکت تولیدی اجرا و نتایج شرح داده خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Proposing a Dynamic Two-Step Approach for Designing Supplier Development Strategy

نویسندگان [English]

  • Azam Sadat Khalili 1
  • Majid Esmaelian 2
  • Dariush Mohamadi 2
1 Ph.D student, University of Isfahan.
2 Associate Professor, University of Isfahan.
چکیده [English]

Supplier segmentation is the basis for the decisions of supply chain managers with the aim of managing and developing suppliers. The purpose of this study is to provide a dynamic approach to designing strategies for supplier development and management. In this research, a two-step approach has been used because the characteristics of purchased items play an important role in the design of these strategies. In the first stage, purchased items are classified according to purchasing portfolio matrix and proper criteria.Then, in the second stage suppliers of each purchased items group are segmented based on two dimensions such as willingness and capabilities. Finally, for each segment of suppliers in each class of purchased items, we provide suitable strategies for supplier development and management. In this work, we used the Delphi method on order to select the best criteria. Then, the criteria weight are determined using Best-Worst method. In the following, the purchased items and suppliers are positioned using MADM method (PROMETHEE). We tested this method for suppliers in a steel company, and the results are explained.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Purchasing Portfolio Matrix
  • Supplier Segmentation
  • Best-Worst Method
  • PROMETHEE Method
  • Supplier Development Strategy

مراجع

  1. Arabzad, S., Razmi, J.,  Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R, &  Ghorbani, M, (2012),”Proposing a New Approach for Supplier Selection Based on Kraljic’s Model Using FMEA and Integer Linear Programming. Journal of Production and Operation Management, 3(1), 19-40. (In Persian)
  2. Bartezzaghi,, & Ronchi, S. (2004). A Portfolio Approach in the e-Purchasing of Materials. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(3), 117–126.
  3. Bensaou, M. (1999). Portfolios of buyer-supplier relationships. Sloan management review, 40(4), 35-36.
  4. Boujelben, M. A. (2017). A unicriterion analysis based on the PROMETHEE principles for multicriteria ordered clustering. Omega, 69, 126-140.
  5. Caniëls, M. C., & Gelderman, C. J. (2007). Power and Interdependence in Buyer Supplier Relationships: A Purchasing Portfolio Approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 219–229.
  6. Drake, P. R., Myung Lee, D. & Hussain, M. (2013). The Lean and Agile Purchasing Portfolio Model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(1), 3–20.
  7. Esmaelian, M., Khalili, S, A. & Tavakoli, M. (2020). Proposing a method for determining the appropriate purchasing strategy based on the purchasing portfolio approach. The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 10(2), 55-82. (In Persian)
  8. Esmaelian, M., Hematgir, H., & Ghaenian, R. (2018). Designing and Implementation of Suppliers Evaluation Process in the Supplier Relationship Management System (SRM) (Case Study: Mobarakeh Steel Company). The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 8(3), 37-61. (In Persian)
  9. Esmaelian, M, & Mohamadi, S. (2017). Multi Attribute Decision Making Techniques (with software implementation) (first ed), Isfahan, University of Isfahan.
  10. Elliott-Shircore, T., & Steele, P. (1985). Procurement positioning overview. Purchasing and Supply Management, December, 23,
  11. Ferreira, L. M. D., Arantes, A., & Kharlamov, A. A. )2015(.Development of a Purchasing Portfolio Model for the Construction Industry: An Empirical Study. Production Planning & Control, 26(5), 377–392.
  12. Gelderman, C. J., & Van Weele, A. J. (2005). Purchasing portfolio models: a critique and update. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(3), 19–28.
  13. Hoshmandi Maher, M., Amiri, M., & Olfat, L. (2013). An Integrated Approach for Supplier Selection in a Supply Chain: IT Capabilities Approach. The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 2(4), 91-11. (In Persian)
  14. Humphreys, P.K., Li, W.L., & Chan, L.Y., (2004). The impact of supplier development on buyer–supplier performance. Omega, 32(2), 131–143.
  15. Knight, L., Tu, Y.-H., & Preston, J. (2014). Integrating skills profiling and purchasing portfolio management: An opportunity for building purchasing capability. International Journal of Production Economics, 147, 271-283.
  16. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing Must Become Supply Management. How Managers Can Guard Against Material Disruption by Formulating a Supply Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 107-117.
  17. Lee, D. M., & Drake, P. R. (2010). A Portfolio Model for Component Purchasing Strategy and the Case Study of Two South Korean Elevator Manufacturers. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22), 6651–6682.
  18. Lilliecreutz, J. & Ydreskog, L. (1999). Supplier Classification as an Enabler for a Differentiated Purchasing Strategy. Global Purchasing & Supply Chain Management, November, 66-74.
  19. Luzzini, D., Caniato, F., Ronchi, S., & Spina, G. (2012). A transaction costs approach to purchasing portfolio management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(9), 1015–1042.
  20. Olsen, R. F., & Ellram, L. M. (1997). A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Industrial marketing management, 26(2), 101-113.
  21. Padhi, S. S., Wagner, S. M., & Aggarwal, V. (2012). Positioning of commodities using the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18(1), 1-8.
  22. Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Wasserman, M.E. )2010(.Thinking differently about purchasing portfolios: an assessment of sustainable sourcing. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 57-73.
  23. Arabzad, M., Razmi , J.,  Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R &  Ghorban, M. (2012), Proposing a New Approach for Supplier Selection Based on Kraljic’s Model Using FMEA and Integer Linear Programming, Production and Operations Management, 3(1), 40-19
  24. Miltenburg, J. (2005). Manufacturing Strategy: How to Formulate and Implement a Winning Plan. 2nd Edition, New York, New York.
  25. Montgomery, T, R., Ogden, A, J., & Boehmke, C. B. (2018). A quantified Kraljic Portfolio Matrix: Using decision analysis for strategic purchasing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(3), 192-203.
  26. Rabieh, M., Azar, A., Modarres Yazdi, M, & Fetanat Fard Haghighi, M. (2011). “Designing a Multi-Objective Resource-Based Mathematical Modeling: An Approach to Supply Chain Risk Reduction (Case Study: Iran Khodro Supply Chain). The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 1(1), 57-77. (In Persian)
  27. Rabieh, M, & Esmaelian, M. (2012). Designing a Fuzzy Non-Linear Model of Supplier Selection in Case of Multiple Sourcing. The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 1(4), 81-105. (In Persian)
  28. Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.
  29. Rezaei, J & Fallah Lajimi, H. (2018). Segmenting supplies and suppliers: bringing together the purchasing portfolio matrix and the supplierpotential matrix. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications,
  30. Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2012). A Multi-variable Approach to Supplier Segmentation. International Journal ofProduction Research, 50(16), 4593–4611.
  31. Rezaei, J., & Ortt. R. (2013a). Multi-criteria Supplier Segmentation Using a Fuzzy Preference Relations Based AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 75–84.
  32. Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2013b). Supplier Segmentation Using Fuzzy Logic. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(4), 507–517.
  33. Rezaei, J., Ortt, R. & Trott, P. (2018). Supply Chain Drivers, Partnerships and Performance of High-tech SMEs: An Empirical Study Using SEM. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(4), 629–653.
  34. Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2105). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best worst method. Expert Systems wit Application., 42(23), 9152–9164,
  35. Segura, M., & Maroto, C. (2017). A multiple criteria supplier segmentation using outranking and value function methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 69, 87-100.
  36. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A.(2008). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. (first, ed), SAGE Publications, Inc.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار