طراحی الگوی فرآیندی توسعه محصولات نرم‌افزاری با رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

چکیده

ادبیات موجود درزمینه توسعه محصول جدید بسیار به محصولات فیزیکی توجه کرده است و این در حالی است که محصولات نرم‌افزاری ویژگی‌های منحصربه‌فردی دارند که باید به آن‌ها در فرآیند توسعه محصول توجه شود. هدف این مقاله شناسایی مراحل توسعه محصولات نرم‌افزاری و تحلیل تعاملات میان این مراحل، با استفاده از رویکرد مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری است. با مرور ادبیات و تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، هشت مرحله توسعه محصولات نرم‌‌افزاری، شامل تحلیل فرصت‌های بازار، ایده‌پردازی، ایجاد مفهوم، توسعه طراحی، مهندسی نمونه‌ای، بازبینی تولید، تولید انبوه و توسعه نسخه‌های اصلاحی شناسایی شدند. سپس این مراحل براساس قدرت وابستگی و قدرت نفوذ طبقه‌بندی شده است. مدل پیشنهادی این تحقیق به شناخت روابط و وابستگی مراحل توسعه محصول کمک می‌کند و نقشه راهی ارائه می‌دهد که می‌تواند احتمال موفقیت توسعه محصولات نرم‌افزاری را افزایش دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing the Process Model of Software Products Development using Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach

نویسنده [English]

  • Mohammad Javad Naeiji
Assistant Professor, Shaid Beheshti University.
چکیده [English]

The existing literature on product development process is largely derived from studies on physical products. However, software products have some special features that make them interesting to study. The objective of this paper is to identify stages of software product development and to analyze the interactions among these stages using interpretive structural modeling technique. Eight main stages including analyze market opportunities, idea   processing, concept generation, design development, prototype engineering, production verification, mass production and corrective versions development have been identified. These stages have been classified, based on their driving power and dependence power. The proposed process model developed will help to understand interdependence of software development stages and will offer a roadmap that may increase the chance for overall success of the new software development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • New Product Development
  • Software Development
  • Process Model
  • Interpretive Structural Modeling

مراجع

1. اسماعیل پور، رضا.، و جباری، مریم. (1389). بررسی فرآیند توسعه محصول جدید از ایده یابی تا عرضه به بازار، چهارمین کنفرانسملیمدیریتتکنولوژیایران، تهران.
2. Adolph, S., Kruchten, P., & Hall, W. (2012). Reconciling perspectives: A grounded theory of how people manage the process of software development.Journal of Systems andSoftware, 85(6), 1269-1286. 
3. Ambler, S.W. (2005). Quality in an agile world. Software Quality Professional, 7(4), 34-40.
4. Attri, R., Nikhil, D.N., & Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach: an overview. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(2), 3-8.
5. Barclay, I., & Dann, Z. (2000). Management and Organizational Factors in New Product Development (NPD) Success, Concurrent Engineering, 8 (2), 115-132.
6. Barczak, G., & Kahn, K.B. (2012). Identifying new product development best practice, Business Horizons, 55, 293-305.
7. Boehm, B.W. (1988). A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer,May, 61-72.
8. Cho, S.H., & Eppinger, S.D. (2005). A Simulation-based Process Model for Managing Complex Design Projects, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(3), 316-328.
9. Cockburn, A. (2001). Agile Software Development. 1st ed., Boston: Addison-Wesley.
10. Coenen, M., Kok, R.A.W. (2014). Workplace flexibility andnew product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules, European Management Journal, 32(4), 564-576.
11. Coleman, G., & O'Connor, R.V. (2008). An investigation into software development process formation in software start‐ups. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 21(6), 633-648.
12. Cooper, R.G. and Kleinschmidt, E.J. (1991). New product processes at leading industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 20(2), 137-147.
13. Corallo, A., Laubacher, R., Margherita, A., & Turrisi, G. (2009). Enhancing product development through knowledge‐based engineering (KBE): A case study in the aerospace industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20 (8), 598-614.
14. Durrani, U.K., Pita, Z., & Richardson, J. (2014). Coexistence of agile and SCM practices: An exploratory study of Australian agile software development organizations. Journal of Information & Software Technology, 16(1), 20-39.
15. Engwall, M., Kling, R., & Werr, A. (2005). Models in action: how management models are interpreted in new product development. R & D Management, 35(4), 427-439.
16. Govindan, K., Palaniappan, M., Zhu, Q., & Kannan, D. (2012). Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 204-211.
17. Grunert, K.G., & van Trijp, H.C.M. (2014). Consumer-Oriented New Product Development. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems, 2, 375-386.
18. Harmancioglu, N., McNally, R.C., Calantone, R.J. & Durmusoglu, S.S. (2007). Your new product development (NPD) is only as good as your process: an exploratory analysis of new NPD process design and implementation. R&D Management 37, 5, pp. 399-424.
19. Highsmith, J. (2004). Agile Project Management, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
20 .Hoyer,W.D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., and Singh, S.S. (2010). Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development, Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283-296.
21. Krishnan, R.T., & Prabhu, G.R. (2002). Innovation in the Indian Information Technology Industry: A Study of the Software Product Development Process. Science, Technology and Society, 7 (1), 91-115.
22. Kettunen, J., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Degraeve, Z., & De Reyck, B. (2015). New product development flexibility in a competitive environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(3), 892-904.
23. Luh, D-B., Ko, Y-T., & Ma, C-H. (2009). A Dynamic Planning Approach for New Product Development. Concurrent Engineering, 17 (1), 43-59.
24. Magdaleno, A.M., Werner, M, L., de Araujo, R.M. (2012). Reconciling software development models: A quasi-systematic review, Journal of Systems andSoftware, 85(2), 351-369.
25. Mandal, A. & Deshmukh, S. (1994). Vendor selection using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 14(6), 52-59.
26.Martín, Y-l., & Yelmo, J.C. (2014). Guidance for theDevelopment of Accessibility Evaluation Tools Following the UnifiedSoftware Development Process.  Procedia Computer Science, 27, 302-311. 
27. Misra, S., Kumar,V., Kumar, U., Fantazy, K., Akhter, M. (2012). Agile software development practices: evolution, principles, and criticisms. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(9), 972-980.
28. Misra, S., & Singh, V. (2015). Conceptualizing open agile software development life cycle (OASDLC) model, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 32 (3), 214-235.
29. Nunnally, J.M. (1994). Psychometric Theory. Third edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Osborne, J.W. (2008). Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
31. Pitta, D., & Pitta, E. (2012). Transforming the nature and scope of new product development. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(1), 35-46.
32. Raj, T., Shankar, R., & Suhaib, M. (2008). An ISM approach for modeling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India.International Journal of Production Research, 46(24), 6883-6912.    
33. Royce, W. (1970). Managing the Development of Large Software Systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics engineers (IEEE), WESCON , 26, 1-9.
34. Smith, T.F.M. (1983). On the validity of Inferences from Non-random Samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 146, 394-403.
35. Toubia,O. (2007).Adaptive Idea Screening Using Consumers. Marketing Science, 26(3), 342-360.
36. Tzokas, N., Hultink, E.J., & Hart, S.  (2004). Navigating the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 619-626.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار