انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان پایدار صنعت داروسازی با استفاده از رویکرد ترکیبی تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره و تحلیل پوششی داده‌‌ها در محیط فازی (مطالعه موردی: شرکت سبحان دارو)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران.

3 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی صنایع، دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیرالدین طوسی، تهران، ایران.

10.48308/jimp.15.1.225

چکیده

مقدمه و اهداف: با توجه به رقابت‌پذیری بازار تولید، شرکت‌ها نگاه ویژه‌ای به مدیریت زنجیره تأمین برای بهبود رقابت‌پذیری خود دارند. امروزه صنایع به دلیل افزایش آگاهی مصرف‌کنندگان و تقاضاهای زیست‌محیطی از بازارهای جهانی بسیار متنوع، بیشتر بر پایداری زنجیره تأمین تمرکز می‌کنند. نقطه شروع دستیابی به پایداری در زنجیره تأمین انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان بر اساس اصول پایداری است. در نتیجه انتخاب تأمین‌کننده پایدار که بخش کلیدی زنجیره‌های تأمین را تشکیل می‌دهد، جهت دستیابی به توسعه پایدار و کسب مزیت رقابتی به یک تصمیم استراتژیک حیاتی برای شرکت‌ها تبدیل شده است. هدف از این تحقیق،  شناسایی مهم‌ترین شاخص‌های پایداری و ارزیابی و انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان در زنجیره تأمین صنعت داروسازی بر اساس عملکرد پایداری آن‌ها می‌باشد.
روش‌ها: این پژوهش بر مبنای هدف، کاربردی است و از نظر روش انجام دادن در گروه پژوهش‌های توصیفی-تحلیلی قرار می‌گیرد. در این مطالعه یک رویکرد ترکیبی جدید تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره فازی و تحلیل پوششی داده‌های فازی جهت انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان مورد استفاده قرار گرفته است. کاربرد رویکرد پیشنهادی درشرکت سبحان دارو به‌عنوان مطالعه موردی انجام شده است. در ابتدا فهرستی از معیارها بر اساس مرور ادبیات پژوهش شناسایی و با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی غربالگری و نهایی شدند. سپس با استفاده از روش دیمتل فازی، تأثیرات متقابل و وابستگی‌های بین عوامل مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. در مرحله بعد برای تعیین میزان اهمیت ابعاد و معیارها از روش فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی استفاده گردید. در نهایت با استفاده از روش تحلیل پوششی داده‌های فازی میزان کارایی تأمین‌کنندگان تعیین گردید و تأمین‌کنندگان برتر شناسایی شدند.
یافته‌ها: با توجه به یافته‌های پژوهش، 33 شاخص‌ شناسایی شده اولیه با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی غربالگری و در نهایت 15 شاخص در 4 بعد اقتصادی، زیست‌محیطی، اجتماعی و خدمات توسط خبرگان تأیید شدند. نتایج روش دیمتل فازی نشان داد که شاخص تعهد به توسعه سیستم مدیریت زیست‌محیطی و انرژی، به‌عنوان اثرگذارترین و شاخص ابتکارات کنترل آلودگی و مدیریت ضایعات مؤثر، به‌عنوان اثرپذیرترین شاخص می‌باشد. هم‌چنین ابعاد اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی بیشترین اثرگذاری را در سیستم دارند و ابعاد اجتماعی و خدمات از بیشترین اثرپذیری در سیستم برخوردار هستند. بر اساس نتایج روش  فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی، معیارهای کیفیت مواد اولیه و بسته‌بندی، تعهد به توسعه سیستم مدیریت زیست‌محیطی و انرژی و سرمایه‌گذاری در تحقیق و توسعه سبز به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین معیارها در ارزیابی تأمین‌کنندگان شناسایی شدند. در میان ابعاد نیز ابعاد اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی بیشترین اهمیت را به خود اختصاص دادند. بر اساس رتبه‌بندی نهایی مدل تحلیل پوششی داده‌های فازی، 15 تأمین‌کننده شرکت سبحان دارو بر اساس میزان کارایی رتبه‌بندی گردیدند که تأمین‌کنندگان ۱، ۶ و 2 به ترتیب در رتبه‌های اول تا سوم قرار گرفتند.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج بیانگر آن است که مدیران و کارشناسان شرکت‌های داروسازی از جمله مدیران بخش تدارکات و خرید، باید هنگام ارزیابی و انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان پایدار، به شاخص‌های اقتصادی و زیست‌محیطی توجه ویژه‌ای ‌داشته باشند. هم‌چنین مدیران شرکت‌ سبحان دارو می‌توانند جهت همکاری با تأمین‌کنندگان 1، 6 و 2 که عملکرد خوبی داشته‌اند، قراردادهای بلندمدت تنظیم کنند. این یافته‌ها نه تنها به شرکت‌های داروسازی در انتخاب بهترین تأمین‌کنندگان کمک می‌کند، بلکه به سایر صنایع نیز این امکان را می‌دهد که با استفاده از این مدل ترکیبی، فرآیند انتخاب تأمین‌کنندگان خود را بهبود بخشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sustainable Supplier Selection in the Pharmaceutical Industry Using a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Data Envelopment Analysis Approach in a Fuzzy Environment (Case Study: Sobhan Darou Company)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Nikjoo 1
  • Nasser Safaie 2
  • Emad Roghanian 3
1 MSc, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Given the competitive nature of the production market, companies pay special attention to supply chain management to enhance their competitiveness. Today, due to increasing consumer awareness and environmental demands from diverse global markets, industries are focusing more on supply chain sustainability. The starting point for achieving sustainability in the supply chain is the selection of suppliers based on sustainability principles. Consequently, sustainable supplier selection, which forms a critical part of supply chains, has become a vital strategic decision for companies aiming to achieve sustainable development and gain a competitive advantage. The purpose of this study is to identify the most important sustainability indicators and evaluate and select suppliers in the pharmaceutical supply chain based on their sustainability performance.
Methods: This research is applied in terms of purpose and is classified as descriptive-analytical in terms of methodology. In this study, a new hybrid approach combining fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) and fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to select suppliers. The proposed approach was implemented in Sobhan Darou Company as a case study. Initially, a list of criteria was identified through a literature review and finalized using the fuzzy Delphi method. Then, the fuzzy DEMATEL method was employed to assess the mutual influence and interdependencies among the criteria. In the next stage, the fuzzy Analytical Network Process (ANP) was used to determine the importance of the dimensions and criteria. Finally, the efficiency of suppliers was determined using fuzzy DEA, and the top-performing suppliers were identified.
Results and discussion: According to the research findings, 33 initially identified criteria were screened using the fuzzy Delphi method, resulting in 15 final criteria across four dimensions: economic, environmental, social, and services, which were confirmed by experts. The results of the fuzzy DEMATEL method indicated that the criterion "Commitment to the Development of Environmental and Energy Management Systems" was the most influential, while the criterion "Pollution Control Initiatives and Effective Waste Management" was the most affected. Additionally, the economic and environmental dimensions had the highest influence within the system, while the social and service dimensions were the most affected. According to the results of the fuzzy ANP method, the criteria "Quality of Raw Materials and Packaging," "Commitment to the Development of Environmental and Energy Management Systems," and "Investment in Green Research and Development" were identified as the most important criteria for supplier evaluation. Among the dimensions, the economic and environmental dimensions were found to be the most significant. Based on the final ranking of the fuzzy DEA model, 15 suppliers of Sobhan Darou were ranked based on their efficiency, with suppliers 1, 6, and 2 ranking first to third, respectively.
Conclusions: The results indicate that managers and experts in pharmaceutical companies, including procurement and purchasing managers, should pay special attention to economic and environmental indicators when evaluating and selecting sustainable suppliers. Furthermore, the managers of Sobhan Darou Company can establish long-term contracts with suppliers 1, 6, and 2, which have demonstrated strong performance. These findings not only help pharmaceutical companies select the best suppliers but also allow other industries to improve their supplier selection processes using this hybrid model.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable Supplier Selection
  • Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
  • Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis
  • Pharmaceutical Industry

مراجع

  1. Acerbi, F., Rocca, R., Fumagalli, L., Taisch, M. (2023). Enhancing the cosmetics industry sustainability through a renewed sustainable supplier selection model. Production & Manufacturing Research, 11(1), 2161021. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2161021
  2. Ahi, P., Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
  3. Amini, A., Alinezhad, A., Gharakhani, D. (2023). A new rough BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 13(3), 9-38. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.48308/jimp.13.3.9
  4. Amin-Tahmasbi, H., Nikjoo, Z. (2021). Ranking of suburban bus passenger transport companies using Multiple-Attribute Decision Making methods. Journal of Transportation Research, 18(3), 259-276. (In Persian).
  5. Anvari, A., Reihani, R. (2020). Strategic evaluation and selection of Pharmaceutical suppliers BOCR -based using fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making. Journal of Healthcare Management, 2(11), 57-69. (In Persian).
  6. Azar, A., Khorrami, A. (2021). Development of Pharmaceutical supply chain agility model using an Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach. Public Management Researches, 14(53), 29-63. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2021.34316.5081
  7. Azizi-Nafteh, M., Shahrokhi, M. (2023). Presenting Mathematical Programming model for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation using the COPRAS method. Supply Chain Management, 25(79), 87-101. (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089198.1402.25.79.6.0
  8. Bafandegan-Emroozi, V., Roozkhosh, P., Modares, A., Roozkhosh, F. (2023). Selecting green suppliers by considering the internet of things and CMCDM approach. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 7(5), 1167-1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41660-023-00336-9
  9. Baki, R. (2022). An integrated Multi-Criteria Structural Equation Model for green supplier selection. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 9(4), 1063-1076.‌ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00415-7
  10. Barzinpour, F., Moazeni, H., Pishvaie, M. (2016). A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model for supplier selection by considering sustainable criteria: (A Case Study in a Stone Industry). Strategic Management Researches, 21(59), 89-115. (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285067.1394.21.59.4.9
  11. Bui, T. D., Tsai, F. M., Tseng, M. L., Ali, M. H. (2020). Identifying sustainable solid waste management barriers in practice using the fuzzy Delphi method. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154, 104625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104625
  12. Carter, C. R., Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360-387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
  13. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  14. Ebrahimi, S., Chalaki, K., Sultanpanah, H. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision Making for sustainable supplier selection using the hybrid fuzzy-rough approach (Case Study: Kurdistan Gas Company). Modern Research in Decision Making, 7(4), 20-49. (In Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24766291.1401.7.4.2.9
  15. Ecer, F. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision Making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: A Case Study of a Home Appliance Manufacturer. Operational Research, 22(1), 199-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00552-y.
  16. Esmaeili, M. (2012). An Enhanced Russell Measure in DEA with interval data. Applied Mathematics and Computation 213(4), 1533-1563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2012.07.060
  17. Fallahpour, A., Nayeri, S., Sheikhalishahi, M., Wong, K. Y., Tian, G., & Fathollahi-Fard, A. M. (2021). A hyper-hybrid fuzzy Decision-Making framework for the sustainable-resilient supplier selection problem: A Case Study of Malaysian Palm Oil Industry. Environmental science and pollution research, 1-21. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-021-12491-y
  18. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 120(3), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  19. Garg, R. K. (2021). Structural Equation Modeling of E-supplier selection criteria in Mechanical Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127597
  20. Gerami, J. (2020). Ranking SERVQUAL dimensions by using fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process technique in the private banking industry (Case Study: Private Banks of Fars Province). New Research in Mathematics, 6(25), 23-40. (In Persian).
  21. Giri, B. C., Molla, M. U., Biswas, P. (2022). Pythagorean fuzzy DEMATEL method for supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications,193, 116396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116396
  22. Gupta, H., Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.125
  23. Habibi, A., Sarafrazi, A., Izadyar, S. (2014). Delphi technique theoretical framework in qualitative research. The International Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 8-13.
  24. Hafezalkotob, A., Haji-Sami, E., Omrani, H. (2015). Robust DEA under discrete uncertain data: A Case Study of Iranian Electricity Distribution Companies. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 11, 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0096-0
  25. Hailiang, Z., Khokhar, M., Islam, T., Sharma, A. (2023). A model for green-resilient supplier selection: fuzzy Best–Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method and its applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(18), 54035-54058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25749-4
  26. Hassanzadeh, R., Rahimpour, N. (2020). Evaluation of ecological vulnerability using Extended Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (EFAHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS) (Case Study: of Kerman Province). Environmental Researches, 11(21), 27-42. (In Persian).
  27. Hendiani, S., Mahmoudi, A., Liao, H. (2020). A Multi-Stage Multi-Criteria Hierarchical Decision-Making approach for sustainable supplier selection. Applied Soft Computing, 94, 106456.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106456
  28. Jamasbi, N., Olfat, L., Amiri, M., Pishvaee, M. S. (2023). Presenting a model for evaluation and selection of sustainable third- party logistics service providers in the supply chain based on the combined approach of fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy and Cocoso technique (Case Study: Dairy Industry). Iranian Journal of Management Sciences, 17(68), 45-74. (In Persian).
  29. Javad, M. O. M., Darvishi, M., Javad, A. O. M. (2020). Green supplier selection for the Steel Industry using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS: A Case Study of Khouzestan Steel Company. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100012
  30. Kayani, S. A., Warsi, S. S., Liaqait, R. A. (2023). A Smart Decision Support Framework for Sustainable and Resilient Supplier Selection and Order Allocation in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Sustainability, 15(7), 5962.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075962

  1. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. (2023). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation using an integrated rog-based type-2 fuzzy Decision-Making approach. Mathematics, 11(9), 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11092014
  2. Khoei, M. A., Jamili, A. (2021). Evaluation and selection of sustainable suppliers in the supply chain using the combined Vikor - FuzzyQFD method in Pharmaceutical Companies (Case Study: Barakat Pharmaceutical Company). Journal of Industrial Strategic Management, 16(57), 188-207. (In Persian).
  3. Koc, K., Ekmekcioğlu, Ö., Işık, Z. (2023). Developing a probabilistic Decision-Making model for reinforced sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108820
  4. Lin, C. J., Wu, W. W. (2008). A causal analytical method for group Decision-Making under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems With Applications, 34(1), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012
  5. Liu, G., Fan, S., Tu, Y., Wang, G. (2021). Innovative supplier selection from collaboration perspective with a hybrid MCDM model: A Case Study Based on NEVs Manufacturer. Symmetry, 13(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13010143
  6. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686-1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.078
  7. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kharb, R. K., & Mangla, S. K. (2016). Evaluating the enablers in solar power developments in the current scenario using fuzzy DEMATEL: An Indian perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.041
  8. Mina, H., Mirabedini, S. N., Kian, H., Ghaderi, S. F. (2014). A new two stage integrated approach for green supplier selection. Applied Mathematics in Engineering, Management and Technology, 1(1), 1247-1126.
  9. Mousavi, P., Yousefizenouz, R., Hasanpoor, A. (2015). Identifying organizational information security risks using fuzzy Delphi. Journal of Information Technology Management, 7(1), 163-184. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22059/jitm.2015.53555
  10. Nasiri, A., Mansory, A., Mohammadi, N. (2022). Developing an integrated model for evaluating the performance of green and resilient suppliers by combining Path Analysis, SWARA and TOPSIS Decision-Making techniques. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 12(2), 227-251. (In Persian) https://doi.org/10.52547/jimp.12.2.227
  11. Nasr, A. K., Tavana, M., Alavi, B., Mina, H. (2021). A novel fuzzy Multi-Objective circular supplier selection and order allocation model for sustainable closed-loop supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 124994.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124994
  12. Nasri, S. A., Ehsani, B., Hosseininezhad, S. J., Safaie, N. (2023). A sustainable supplier selection method using integrated fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP–DEA approach (Case Study: Petroleum Industry). Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(11), 12791-12827. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02590-2
  13. Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, P. H., Pham, H. A., Nguyen, T. G., Nguyen, D. T., Tran, T. H., Phung, H. T. (2022). A novel integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and spherical fuzzy MCDM approach for sustainable supplier selection in Steel Industry. Mathematics, 10(11), 1897. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111897
  14. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G. H. (2003). Defuzzification within a Multi Criteria Decision model. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(05), 635-652. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488503002387
  15. Pamucar, D., Torkayesh, A. E., Biswas, S. (2023). Supplier selection in Healthcare supply chain management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A novel fuzzy rough Decision-Making approach. Annals of Operations Research, 328(1), 977-1019. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10479-022-04529-2
  16. Pishvaee, M. S., Razmi, J., Torabi, S. A. (2012). Robust Possibilistic Programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: A new approach. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 206, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010
  17. Rafieian-Esfahani, M., Yazdani, B., Barati, M., Naghsh, A. R., Janatian, N. (2023). Drivers, enablers and challenges of supply chain sustainability in Pharmaceutical Industry: A systematic review. Supply Chain Management, 25(78), 89-108. (In Persian).
  18. 48. Rahardjo, B., Wang, F. K., Lo, S. C., Chou, J. H. (2023). A hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model combining DANP with VIKOR for Sustainable Supplier Selection in Electronics Industry. Sustainability, 15(5), 4588.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054588
  19. Rashidi, K., Noorizadeh, A., Kannan, D., Cullinane, K. (2020). Applying the triple bottom line in sustainable supplier selection: A meta-review of the state-of-the-art. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122001
  20. Seifbarghy, M. (2022). A Multi-Objective sustainable closed loop supply chain model considering suppliers evaluation and using SWARA-WASPAS method. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 12(3), 63-88. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.52547/jimp.12.3.63
  21. Seker, S., Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites. Sustainability, 9(11), 2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9112083
  22. Shang, Z., Yang, X., Barnes, D., Wu, C. (2022). Supplier selection in sustainable supply chains: Using the integrated BWM, fuzzy Shannon Entropy, and fuzzy MULTIMOORA methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 195, 116567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116567
  23. Soltanifar, M., Zargar, S. M., Homayounfar, M. (2022). Green supplier selection: A hybrid group voting Analytical Hierarchy Process approach. Journal of Operational Research and Its Applications (Applied Mathematics), 19 (2), 113-132. (In Persian). http://jamlu.liau.ac.ir/article-1-1902-fa.html
  24. Taebi, P., Alavi-Sadr, M. H., Khatami-Firozabadi, S. M. A. (2024). Identifying and prioritizing for selection of suitable suppliers based on the quadruple dimensions of sustainability with a Multi Criteria Decision Makin approach. Iran Rubber Industry, 28(112), 46-63. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/irm.2024.430514.1254
  25. Taherdoost, H., Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the process of supplier selection criteria and methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024-1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317
  26. Tsai, J. F., Shen, S. P., Lin, M. H. (2023). Applying a hybrid MCDM model to evaluate green supply chain management practices. Sustainability, 15(3), 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032148
  27. Wang, Y., Yang, Y. (2021). Analyzing the green innovation practices based on sustainability performance indicators: A Chinese Manufacturing Industry Case. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 1181-1203.‏‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-020-10531-7
  28. Wei, Q., Zhou, C. (2023). A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making framework for electric vehicle supplier selection of government agencies and public bodies in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(4), 10540-10559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22783-6
  29. Yang, Y., Wang, Y. (2020). Supplier selection for the adoption of green innovation in sustainable supply chain management practices: A Case of the Chinese Textile Manufacturing Industry. Processes, 8(6), 717. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8060717
  30. Yeganeh, Z., Ahmadi, P., Pournasir-Rudineh, M. (2022). Application of Interpretive Structural Modeling and Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for green supplier selection in supply chain (Case Study: Pars Khazar Industrial Company). Journal of Research in Management and Accounting, 54, 251-274. (In Persian).
  31. Zhu, Q., Liu, A., Li, Z., Yang, Y., Miao, J. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection and evaluation for the effective supply chain management system. Systems, 10(5), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10050166
چشم‌انداز مدیریت صنعتی
دوره 15، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 57
اردیبهشت 1404
صفحه 225-256

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار