مدلسازی توانمندسازهای صنعت ۴.0 در پیاده سازی زنجیره تأمین پایدار با رویکرد دیمتل-فرآیند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، شناسایی توانمندسازهای صنعت ۴.۰ پایداری زنجیره تأمین و تلاش بیشتر برای پیشنهاد یک چارچوب پژوهشی برای پل‌زدن به شکاف‌های نظری است. ابتدا توانمندسازهایی که بر اتخاذ قابلیت پایداری تأثیر می‌گذارند از طریق مرور مقاله­‌های داخلی و خارجی به‌وسیله روش فراترکیب شناسایی شد و پس از شناسایی، توانمندسازها به‌صورت پرسشنامه مقایسه زوجی درآمد و در اختیار 12 نفر از خبرگان حوزه صنایع تولیدی کاشی در استان یزد قرار گرفت. با اطلاعات به‌دست‌آمده از پرسشنامه و تحلیل آن با استفاده از روش ترکیبی دیمتل ـ فرایند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی درنهایت مدلی ارائه شد. از نتایج پژوهش بخش فراترکیب 114 کُد باز، 26 کُد محوری و درنهایت 7 کُد انتخابی استخراج شد که کُدهای انتخابی شامل عوامل سازمانی، سیستم تولید، محیط‌زیست، محصول، اقتصادی، فناوری و اجتماعی است که در روش ترکیبی دیمتل ـ فرایند تحلیل شبکه‌ای فازی، روابط و اهمیت این توانمندسازها بررسی و مشخص شد که بُعد «فناوری» تأثیرگذارترین، بُعد «محصول» تأثیرپذیرترین و بُعد «اقتصادی» مهم‌ترین ابعاد محسوب می‌شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling the Enablers of Industry 4.0 in the Implementation of a Sustainable Supply Chain with Fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Alireza Rokneddini 1
  • Davod Andalib Ardakani 2
  • Habib Zare Ahmadabadi 2
  • Seyyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamkan 3
1 PhD student, Department of Industrial Management, Economics, Management and Accounting Faculty, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Economics, Management and Accounting Faculty, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Economics, Management and Accounting Faculty, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this paper is to identify the enablers of Industry 4.0 supply chain sustainability and further attempt to propose a research framework to bridge the theoretical gaps. At first, the enablers that influence the adoption of sustainability capability were identified through the review of domestic and foreign articles using the meta-combination method. After identification, the enablers were compared through a questionnaire and provided to 12 experts in the field of tile manufacturing industries in Yazd province. Using the information obtained from the questionnaire and its analysis through the combined method of DEMATEL-Fuzzy Network Analysis Process, a model was ultimately presented. The research results of the meta-combination section identified 114 open codes, 26 central codes, and finally 7 selective codes. The selected codes include organizational, production system, environmental, product, economic, technological, and social factors, which were analyzed using the combined method of Fuzzy Dematel-ANP. The relations and importance of these enablers were examined, and It was determined that the "technology" dimension is the most influential, the "product" dimension is the most susceptible, and the "economic" dimension is the most important dimension.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Industry 4.0
  • Industry 4.0 enablers
  • Sustainable supply chain
  • Supply chain
  • Sustainability

مراجع

  1. Andalib Ardakani, D., & Shams, S. (2020). Identification and modeling of green supply chain management in small and medium sized industries. Journal of business administration researches, 12(23), 169-193.
  2. Bayati, KH., & Roghanian, E. (2021) Industrial symbiosis network optimization considering sustainable development characteristics, Journal of Production and Operations Management, 12(24).
  3. Alaba, F.A., Othman, M., Hashem, I.A.T. & Alotaibi, F. (2017). Internet of things security: a survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 88, 10-28.
  4. Ardito, L., D'Adda, D., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2018). Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 317-330.
  5. Ajmera, P. & Jain, V. (2019a). Modeling the factors affecting the quality of life in diabetic patients in India using total interpretive structural modeling”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(3), 951-970.
  6. Aslani Liaei, V., Abedi, S., Irajpour, A., & Ehtesham Rathi, R. (2021). Designing a Model for Evaluation of Sustainable Supply Chain Multi Capabilities Based on Artificial Intelligence. The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 11(3), 107-129.
  7. Bahrami, M. R., Hashemzadeh, G. R., Shahmansoury, A., & Fathi Hafshejani, K. (2022). Analyzing Effective Components in Industry 4.0 Readiness Assessments. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective.
  8. Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M. & Rosenberg, M. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial and Mechatronics Engineering, 8(1), 37-44.
  9. Bag, S., & Pretorius, J. H. C. (2022). Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 864-898..
  10. Benias, N., & Markopoulos, A.P. (2017). A review on the readiness level and cyber-security challenges in Industry 4.0. Conference on Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media, IEEE, Kastoria, 1-5.
  11. Beekaroo, D., Callychurn, D.S., & Hurreeram, D.K. )2019(. Developing a sustainabilityindex for Mauritian manufacturing companies. Indic., 96, 250–257.
  12. Bhatia, M.S., Jakhar, S.K., Mangla, S.K., & Gangwani, K.K. )2020(. Critical factors to environment management in a closed loop supply chain. J. Clean. Prod. 255, 120239.
  13. Berghaus, S.; & Back, A. (2016). Stages in Digital Business Transformation: Results of an Empirical Maturity Study. In Proceedings of the Tenth Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS), Paphos, Cyprus, 4–6 September 2016. Impuls: Industrie 4.0 Readiness.
  14. Beier, G., Ullrich, A., Niehoff, S., Reißig, M., & Habich, M. )2020(. Industry 4.0: how it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes e a literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 259, 120856.
  15. Cezarino, L. O., Liboni, L. B., Oliveira Stefanelli, N., Oliveira, B. G., & Stocco, L. C. (2021). Diving into emerging economies bottleneck: Industry 4.0 and implications for circular economy. Management Decision, 59(8), 1841-1862.
  16. Calabrese, A., Levialdi Ghiron, N., & Tiburzi, L. (2021). ‘Evolutions’ and ‘revolutions’ in manufacturers’ implementation of industry 4.0: a literature review, a multiple case study, and a conceptual framework. Production Planning & Control, 32(3), 213-227.
  17. Colotla, I., Fæste, A., Heidemann, A., Winther, A., Andersen, P. H., Duvold, T., & Hansen, M. (2016). Winning the Industry 4.0 race: How ready are Danish manufacturers. Consult. Gr., 42.
  18. Christians, A., & Liepin, M. (2017). The consequences of digitalization for German civil law from the national legislator’s point of view. Zeitschrift fuer Geistiges Eigentum/Intellectual Property Journal, 9(3), 331-339.
  19. Cai, W., hung Lai, K., Liu, C., Wei, F., Ma, M., Jia, S., Jiang, Z., Lv, L. (2019). Promotingsustainability of manufacturing industry through the lean energy-saving andemission-reduction strategy. Total Environ. 665, 23–32.
  20. de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Jabbour, C.J.C., Foropon, C., Filho, M.G. (2018). When titansmeet – can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable man-ufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technol. Forecast. Soc.Change 132, 18–25.
  21. Dujin, A., Geissler, C., & Horstk€otter. D. (2014). Think Act: Industry 4.0. Munich, Germany: Ronald Berger Strategy Consultants.
  22. Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P.; Ott, K., Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible Industry 4.0: A scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Procedia CiRp, 54, 13–18.
  23. Fatimah, Y.A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: a case study of Indonesia. J. Prod. 269, 122263.
  24. Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2018). A critical investigation of Industry 4.0 in man-ufacturing: theoretical operationalisation framework. Plan. Control., 29, 633–644.
  25. Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Impact of Industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning & Control, 32(1), 63-81.
  26. Ghobakhloo, M. (2020). Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. Clean. Prod. 252, 119869.
  27. Gilchrist, A. (2016). Industry 4.0: The Industrial Internet of Things. Springer, Heidelberg.
  28. Gmelin, H., & Seuring, S. (2014). Achieving sustainable new product development byintegrating product life-cycle management capabilities. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 154, 166–177.
  29. Ghadimi, P., Wang, C., Lim, M.K., & Heavey, C. (2019). Intelligent sustainable supplierselection using multi-agent technology: theory and application for Industry 4.0supply chains. Ind. Eng. 127, 588–600.
  30. Ghobakhloo, M. (2018). The Future of Manufacturing Industry: A Strategic Roadmap toward Industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(6), 910–936.
  31. Gbededo, M.A., Liyanage, K., & Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2018). Towards a life cycle sustainabil-ity analysis: a systematic review of approaches to sustainable manufacturing. Clean. Prod. 184, 1002–1015,
  32. Ghasemian Sahebi, I., Arab, A., & Sadeghi Moghadam, M.R. (2017). Analyzing the barri-ers to humanitarian supply chain management: a case study of the Tehran RedCrescent Societies. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 24, 232–241.
  33. Grafström, J., & Aasma, S. (2021). Breaking circular economy barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126002.
  34. Gupta, H., Kumar, A., & Wasan, P. (2021). Industry 4.0, cleaner production and circular economy: An integrative framework for evaluating ethical and sustainable business performance of manufacturing organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, 126253.
  35. Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on Computers in Industry, 89(1), 23-34.
  36. Hong, P., Jagani, S., Kim, J., & Youn, S.H. (2019). Managing sustainability orientation: anempirical investigation of manufacturing firms. J. Prod. Econ., 211, 71–81.
  37. Jain, V., & Soni, V.K. (2019). Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by fuzzy TISM. Journal of Modelling in Management, 14(1), 2-30.
  38. Jabbour, D.S., Lopes, A.B., Jabbour, C.J.C., Foropon, C. & Godinho Filho, M. (2018a). When titans meet— can Industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132(1), 18-25.
  39. Iris (2013). Digitalisering af dansk erhvervsliv. [Digitalizing Danish Business Community], accessed 9 July 2019.
  40. Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S.A. (2018). Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 117,
  41. Kamali Saraji, M., Streimikiene, D., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2021). Fermatean Fuzzy CRITIC-COPRAS Method for Evaluating the Challenges to Industry 4.0 Adoption for a Sustainable Digital Transformation. Sustainability, 13(17),
  42. Kirchherr, J.W., Hekkert, M.P., Bour, R., Huijbrechtse-Truijens, A., Kostense-Smit, E., & Muller, J. (2017). Breaking the Barriers to the Circular Economy. https://dspace.libuu.nl/handle/1874/356517.
  43. Kumar, R., Singh, R.K., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2020). Application of industry 4.0 technologies in SMEs for ethical and sustainable operations: Analysis of challenges. J. Clean. Prod., 275, 124063
  44. Kumar, P., Singh, R. K., & Kumar, V. (2021). Managing supply chains for sustainable operations in the era of industry 4.0 and circular economy: Analysis of barriers. Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 164,
  45. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. & Helbig. J. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Munich, Germany: Acatech
  46. Katiyar, R., Meena, P.L., Barua, M.K., Tibrewala, R., & Kumar, G. (2018). Impact of sus-tainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: findingsfrom an emerging economy. J. Prod. Econ. 197, 303–316.
  47. Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., Dhone, N.C. (2020). Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing Int. J. Prod. Res., 58, 1319e1337.
  48. Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A., Gawankar, S.A., (2018)b. Sustainable Industry 4.0 frame-work: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and futureperspectives. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 117, 408–425.
  49. Kagermann, H. (2015). Change through digitization-value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. in Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A. and Reichwald, R. (Eds), Management of Permanent Change, Springer, Heidelberg, 23-45.
  50. Koch, V., Kuge, S., Geissbauer, R., & Schrauf, S. (2014). Industry 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges of the Industrial Internet, Strategy & PwC, available at: http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/ industry-4-0 (accessed 10 March 2017).
  51. Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58(4), 431-440.
  52. Luthra, S., Mangla, S.K., & Yadav, G. (2019). An analysis of causal relationships amongchallenges impeding redistributed manufacturing in emerging economies. Clean. Prod., 225, 949–962.
  53. Latif, H.H., Gopalakrishnan, B., Nimbarte, A., & Currie, K. (2017). Sustainability indexdevelopment for manufacturing industry. Energy Technol. Assessments., 24, 82–95.
  54. Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies:the moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. J. Prod. Econ., 187, 182–195.
  55. Luthra, S., Kumar, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Mangla, S.K., & Garza-Reyes, J.A. (2020). Industry4.0 as an enabler of sustainability diffusion in supply chain: an analysis of influential strength of drivers in an emerging economy. J. Prod. Res., 58(5), 1505e1521.
  56. Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E.d.F.R. & Ramos, L.F.P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629.
  57. Müller, J.M., Buliga, O., & Voigt, K.I. (2018). Fortune favors the prepared: how SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 2-17
  58. Mangla, S. K., Sharma, Y. K., Patil, P. P., Yadav, G., & Xu, J. (2019). Logistics and distribution challenges to managing operations for corporate sustainability: study on leading Indian diary organizations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117620.
  59. Machado, C.G., Winroth, M.P., & Ribeiro da Silva, E.H.D. (2020). Sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda. Int. J. Prod. Res., 58,
  60. Mahpour, A. (2018). Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 134, 216–227.
  61. Mani, V., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Four forces of supply chain social sustainabilityadoption in emerging economies. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 199, 150–161.
  62. Majumdar, A., Sinha, S. K., & Govindan, K. (2021). Prioritising risk mitigation strategies for environmentally sustainable clothing supply chains: Insights from selected organisational theories. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 543–555.
  63. Nimawat, D & Gidwan, B.D. (2021). Prioritization of barriers for Industry 4.0 adoption in the context of Indian manufacturing industries using AHP and ANP analysis. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 34(11), 1139-1161
  64. Nujoom, R., & Mohammed, A. (2019). Drafting a cost-effective approach towards a sus-tainable manufacturing system design. Ind. Eng., 133, 317–330.
  65. Oesterreich, T. D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in industry, 83, 121-139.
  66. Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10(10),
  67. Piyathanavong, V., Garza-Reyes, J.A., Kumar, V., Maldonado-Guzm_an, G., Mangla, S.K., (2019). The adoption of operational environmental sustainability approaches in the Thai manufacturing sector. Clean. Prod., 220, 507e528.
  68. Prause, M. (2019). Challenges of Industry 4.0 Technology Adoption for SMEs: The Case of Japan. Sustainability, 11(20),
  69. Peillon, S., & Dubruc, N. (2019). Barriers to Digital Servitization in French Manufacturing SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 83, 146–150.
  70. Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., & Trentesaux, D. (2019). Ethical risks OF human-machine symbiosis IN industry 4.0: insights from the human-machine cooperation IFAC-PapersOnLine, 52, 19e24.
  71. Pereira, T., Barreto, L., & Amaral, A. (2017). Network and information security challenges within Industry 4.0 paradigm. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1253-1260.
  72. Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R.-C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., & Jozinović, P. (2015). Industry 0-potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. paper presented at BIS 18th International Conference on Business Information Systems, Poznań, Springer International Publishing, June.
  73. Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77-95.
  74. Sanders, A., Elangeswaran, C., & Wulfsberg, J. (2016). Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9(3), 811-833.
  75. Stoycheva, S., Marchese, D., Paul, C., Padoan, S., salam Juhmani, A., & Linkov, I. (2018). Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing inautomotive industry. Clean. Prod., 187, 257–272,
  76. Stentoft, J., & Rajkumar, C. (2020). The Relevance of Industry 4.0 and Its Relationship with Moving Manufacturing out, Back and Staying at Home. International Journal of Production Research, 58 (10), 2953–2973.
  77. Devi K, S., Paranitharan, K. P., & Agniveesh A, I. (2021). Interpretive framework by analysing the enablers for implementation of Industry 4.0: an ISM approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(13-14), 1494-1514.
  78. Schwab, L., Gold, S., & Reiner, G. (2019). Exploring financial sustainability of SMEs during periods of production growth: a simulation study. J. Prod. Econ. 212, 8e18.
  79. Sung, T.K. (2018). Industry 4.0: a Korea perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 132, 40-45.
  80. Stock, T., & Seliger, G. (2016). Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40(1), 536–541.
  81. Shivajee, V., Singh, R.K., & Rastogi, S. (2019). Manufacturing conversion cost reduction using quality control tools and digitization of real-time data. Clean. Prod., 237, 117678.
  82. Singh, R.K., Kumar, A., Garza-Reyes, J.A., de S ́a, M.M., (2020). Managing operations for circular economy in the mining sector: an analysis of barriers intensity. Policy, 69, 101752
  83. Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C. & Hauptvogel, A. (2013). Sustainable increase of overhead productivity due to cyber-physical-systems. Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing – Innovation Solutions, 332-335
  84. Rajak, S., & Vinodh, S. (2015). Application of fuzzy logic for social sustainabilityperformance evaluation: a case study of an Indian automotive component man-ufacturing organization. Clean. Prod. 108, 1–9.
  85. Rahchamani, S. M., Heydariyeh, S. A., & Zargar, S. M. (2022). Designing a Model for Intelligent Service Supply Chain Based on Grounded Theory (Case Study: Omid Entrepreneurship Fund). The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 12(2), 89-111.
  86. Raj, A., Dwivedi, G., Sharma, A., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Rajak, S. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies in the manufacturing sector: An inter-country comparative perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 224, 107546.
  87. Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R. (2016). A categorical framework of manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP, 52, 173-178.
  88. Tseng, M.L., Wu, K.J., Hu, J., & Wang, C.H. (2018). Decision-making model for sustainablesupply chain finance under uncertainties. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 205, 30–36.
  89. Trappey, A. J. C., C. V. Trappey, U. H. Govindarajan, A. C. Chuang, & Sun, J. J. (2017). A Review of Essential Standards and Patent Landscapes for the Internet of Things: A Key Enabler for Industry 4.0. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 208–229.
  90. Tortorella, G.L., & Fettermann, D. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean pro-duction in Brazilian manufacturing companies. J. Prod. Res. 56, 2975 -2987.
  91. Thakur, V., & Mangla, S.K, (2019). Change management for sustainability: evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector. Clean. Prod., 213, 847e862.
  92. Vigneshwaran, S., Uthayakumar, M., & Arumugaprabu, V. (2020). Potential use of industrial waste-red mud in developing hybrid composites: A waste management approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124278.
  93. Walendowski, J., H. Kroll, & Schnabl. E. (2016). Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016: Thematic Paper 3–Industry 4.0, Advanced Materials (Nanotechnology). Brussels: The European Commission.
  94. Wankhede, V. A., & Vinodh, S. (2021). Analysis of Industry 4.0 Challenges using Best Worst Method: A case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering 159(3),
  95. Wang, Y., Ma, H.-S., Yang, J.-H. & Wang, K.-S. (2017). Industry 4.0: a way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Advances in Manufacturing, 5(4), 311-320.
  96. Wagire, A. A., Joshi, R., Rathore, A. P. S., & Jain, R. (2020). Development of maturity model for assessing the implementation of Industry 4.0: learning from theory and practice. Production Planning & Control, 1–20.
  97. Xu, Da L., Xu, E.L., Li, L., (2018). Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. J.Prod. Res., 56, 2941–2962.
  98. Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S.K., Mangla, S.K., & Rai, D.P. (2020). A framework to over-come sustainable supply chain challenges through solution measures of industry4.0 and circular economy: an automotive case. Clean. Prod. 254, 120112.
  99. Yadav, G., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., & Jakhar, S. (2018). Hybrid BWM-ELECTRE-based deci-sion framework for effective offshore outsourcing adoption: a case study. J.Prod. Res. 56, 6259–6278.
  100. Zarte, M., Pechmann, A., & Nunes, I.L., (2019). Decision support systems for sustainablemanufacturing surrounding the product and production life cycle – a literaturereview. Clean. Prod., 219, 336–349.
  101. Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020). Critical success factors of green innova-tion: technology, organization and environment readiness. Clean. Prod. 264, 121701.
  102. Zhou, K., Liu, T. & Zhou, L. (2015). Industry 4.0: towards future industrial opportunities and challenges”, 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, IEEE, Zhangjiajie, 2147-2152,

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار