شناسایی و بررسی روابط میان انگیزه‌های مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری نوآوری رایگان (مورد مطالعه: بوم‌سازگان نوآوری ایران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

2 کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.

چکیده

نوآوری رایگان، مفهومی است که به «لطف رایگان» افراد جهت ارائه‌ ایده برای رفع مشکلات گفته می‌شود. در نوآوری رایگان معامله‌ای از جنس مالی وجود ندارد و این سؤال مطرح می‌شود که نوآوران چگونه به مشارکت ترغیب می‌شوند؟ در بررسی‌های پیشین، نوآوری رایگان به­‌طور مستقیم در مورد منافع و ارزش‌­های انسانی است و با منفعت، مشارکت، سرگرمی، آموزش، خلاقیت، بشردوستی و دیگر موضوعات مهم همراه با «رشد و پیشرفت انسانی» سروکار دارد. این پژوهش برای پاسخ به سؤال مطرح‌شده و بررسی بوم‌سازگان نوآوری رایگان در ایران، انگیزه‌های مؤثر بر شکل‌گیری نوآوری رایگان شناسایی و انگیزه‌های شناسایی‌شده، رتبه‌بندی شدند. با بررسی ادبیات موجود در حوزه نوآوری رایگان با استفاده از خبره‌سنجی و روش دلفی‌فازی، انگیزه‌های مؤثر شناسایی و سپس با استفاده از دیمتل، تأثیر 8 انگیزه‌ نهایی با نظرهای خبرگان پژوهش شامل انسان‌دوستی، پاداش شخصی، پذیرش اجتماعی، مسئولیت‌پذیری اجتماعی، افزایش شهرت و منزلت، کمک‌رسانی، احساس رضایت­مندی از منزلت و لذت یادگیری می‌باشد. ارزش‌ این پژوهش، آن است تا نخست مبانی نظری حوزه‌ نوآوری رایگان در زبان فارسی را غنی کند و سپس با فراهم­‌کردن پیشنهادهای سیاستی، زمینه را برای بهره‌مندی از نتایج اجرای نوآوری رایگان در جامعه ایران فراهم سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Investigating the Relationships between the Motivations Affecting the Formation of Free Innovation (Case Study: Iran's Innovation Ecosystem)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Asghar Sadabadi Arani 1
  • Mohammad Sadegh Khayatian 1
  • Fatemeh Mohammadi 2
  • Fatemeh Jafarian 2
1 Assistant Professor, Shahid Beheshti University.
2 MA, Shahid Beheshti University.
چکیده [English]

Free innovation is a concept that refers to the voluntary contribution of ideas by individuals for problem-solving purposes without any financial transaction. The question arises as to how innovators are motivated to participate in this process. Previous studies have shown that free innovation is directly related to human interests and values, and encompasses issues such as benefits, participation, entertainment, education, creativity, philanthropy, and other important topics related to "human development and progress." This study aimed to address the question of free innovation and investigate the free innovation ecosystems in Iran. The effective motivations for the formation of free innovation were identified and ranked. By reviewing the literature on free innovation, using expert evaluation and the Delphi method, the effective motivations were identified. Then, using Dimtel, the impact of the final eight motivations with the opinions of research experts was examined. These motivations included philanthropy, personal reward, social acceptance, social responsibility, increase in fame and dignity, helping, feeling satisfied with dignity, and the joy of learning. The value of this research lies in enriching the theoretical foundations of free innovation in Persian language, and providing policy recommendations that lay the groundwork for leveraging the implementation of free innovation in Iranian society.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Free Innovation in Iran
  • Consumer Innovation
  • Effective Incentives
  • Free Innovators
  • Expertise

مراجع

  1. Akbari, M., and Qolizadeh, M., & Kazemi, H. (2019). Investigating the impact of consumer innovation and personal characteristics on new product acceptance. Innovation and value creation, 9(17), 17-27.
  2. Baldwin, C. Y. (2008). Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions and the boundaries of firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 17(1), 155-195.
  3. Bessant, John (2017). What is Free Innovation? https://blog.hypeinnovation. com/ what-is-free-innovation
  4. Bosch‐Sijtsema, P., & Bosch, J. (2015). User involvement throughout the innovation process in high‐tech industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 793-807.‏
  5. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9(3), 458-467.‏
  6. De Jong, J.P.J.(2013). User innovation by Canadian consumers: Analysis of a sample of 2,021 respondents. Unpuplishedpaper commissioned by Industry Canada.
  7. De Jong, J. P., Von Hippel, E., Gault, F., Kuusisto, J., & Raasch, C. (2015). Market failure in the diffusion of consumer-developed innovations: Patterns in Finland. Research Policy, 44(10), 1856-1865.‏
  8. De Jong, M., & van Dijk, M. (2015). Disrupting beliefs: A new approach to business-model innovation. McKinsey Quarterly, 3(3), 1-10.‏
  9. Escobar, O., Schiavone, F., Khvatova, T., & Maalaoui, A. (2021). Lead user innovation and entrepreneurship: Analyzing the current state of research. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-18.‏
  10. Gallini, N., & Scotchmer, S. (2002). Intellectual property: when is it the best incentive system? Innovation policy and the economy, 2, 51-77.
  11. Gambardella, A., Raasch, C., & von Hippel. E. (2016). The User Innovation Paradigm: Impacts on Markets and Welfare. Management Science, forthcoming
  12. Gault, F. & von hippel, E. (2009). The prevalence of user innovation and free innovation transfers: Implications for statistical indicators and innovation policy. MIT Sloan School of Management
  13. Hosseinpour, H., & Yazdani, M. (2018). New product development by evaluating and ranking engineering technical requirements based on a combined approach of QFD, DEMATEL - Fuzzy ANP and DEA methods. The Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(2), 153-179.(In Persion)
  14. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max–min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55, 241–253.
  15. Jeppesen, L. B. (2021). Social movements and free innovation. Research Policy, 50(6),‏
  16. Karimi, M., Namamian, F., Vafaei, F., & Moradi, A. (2020). Identification and evaluation of entrepreneurship and innovation indicators of smart international companies using DEMATEL-ANP. The Journal of Industrial Management Perspectives, 10(4), 117-154. (In Persion)
  17. Kim, Y. (2015).Consumer User innovation in Korea: An international comparison and Policy implication. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 23(1), 69-86.
  18. Machlup, F., & Penrose, E. (1950). The patent controversy in the nineteenth century. The Journal of Economic History, 10(1), 1-29.‏
  19. Mohammadi Aterghale, Fatemeh, Explaining the development of free innovation (a case study of Iran's innovation ecosystem), master's thesis in the field of science and technology policy, Research Institute for Fundamental Studies of Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, (1400). (In Persion)
  20. Robertson, Evan D. (2010). User‐Led Innovation and Economic Development. Hacker  Spaces. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle /1853/35792/erobertson_Hacker%20Spaces_User-Led%20Innovation%20and%20Economic%20Development.pdf
  21. Sadabadi, A. A., Rahimi Rad, Z., & Fartash, K. (2022). Comprehensive evaluation of Iranian regional innovation system (RIS) performance using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(2), 304-328.‏
  22. Sadabadi, A.A., Khayatian, M. S., & Mohammadi Atergaleh, F. (2021). Analytical-logical explanation (definition, background, differentiation and similarity, diffusion and expansion) of free innovation. Farda Management, 67(20), 109-124. (In Persion)
  23. Saadabadi, A. A., Khayatian, M. S., Mohammadi Atarghale, F. (2021). Identifying the factors influencing the formation of the free innovation process in Iran using fuzzy Delphi and Dimtel approach. Innovation and Value Creation Quarterly, 20(10), 1-14.
  24. Schumpeter, J. A., & Nichol, A. J. (1934). Robinson's economics of imperfect competition. Journal of political economy, 42(2), 249-259.‏
  25. Shabiri Zanjani, S.H & Nizam al-Malki, J. (2019). Analysis and evaluation of the applicability of the innovation development model of the open source legal approach in the field of biotechnology based on the theory of consumer innovation with a global perspective. Comparative Law Studies, 10(2), 485-526. (In Persion)
  26. Sichel, D., & von Hippel, E. (2019). Household innovation, R&D, and new measures of intangible capital(No. w25599). National Bureau of Economic Research.‏
  27. Talebi, D., Esmaili, J, Mozhezidikhah Tehran, A. (2022). Investigating the effect of knowledge management capabilities on innovation performance with the mediating effect of open innovation (case study: Fardis Science and Technology Park). The Journal of Industrial management perspective. 12(46) .(In Persion)
  28. Tedelis, S., & Williamson, O.E. (2013). Transaction cost economics. In Handbook of Organizational Economics, Robert Gibbons and John Roberts. Princeton University Press.
  29. Von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2008). Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 58-67.‏
  30. von Hippel, E., de Jong, J. P., & Rademaker, D. (2017). Household Sector Innovation. Mohammed Bin Rashid Centre for Government Innovation, UAE, (July).‏
  31. Von Hippel, E. (2016). Free innovation(p. 240). The MIT Press.‏
  32. Van Hippel. Free innovation. (2016) translated by Ali Asghar Saadabadi. Publications of Imam Sadegh University
  33. Von Hippel, E. A., de Jong, J.P.J. & Fiowers, S. (2012). Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: Findings from a representative survey in the United Kingdom. Management Science 58(9), 1669-1681.
  34. Von Hippel, E., Ogawa, S., & de Jong, J. P. J. (2011). the age of the consumer- innovator. Sloan management Review 53(1), 27-35.
  35. Von Hippel, E. (2005). Open source software projects as user innovation networks. Perspectives on free and open source software, 267-278.‏
  36. Yan, J., Leidner, D. E., & Benbya, H. (2018). Differential innovativeness outcomes of user and employee participation in an online user innovation community. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(3), 900-933.‏
  37. Yu, X., Kohlbacher, F., & Ogawa, S. (2020). How a user innovation origin affects firms’ subsequent innovation performance: The case of Japan’s fishing tackle industry. Innovation, 22(2), 160-192.‏
  38. Zolfagharzadeh, M. M., Aslani, A., Sadabadi, A. A., Sanaei, M., Lesan Toosi, F., & Hajari, M. (2017). Science and technology diplomacy: a framework at the national level. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 8(2), 98-128.‏

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار