Document Type : Original Article


Professor, Allameh Tabatabaei University.


The management of technology is a vital determinant of long-run success or failure of organizations. Because technology is an importance factor in extension of world economic, so existent and new technology management influences on business level. This paper analyzes technology management position in Sepah bank and proposes an approach based on combining Analytic Network Process (ANP) and VIKOR techniques for understanding relation between competitive advantages and preferences of the bank. Therefore, for weighting criteria is used ANP technique and VIKOR method to ranking operational plans of the bank. In this paper, is surveyed the group understanding of Sepah bank’ managers, so that the results obtained can help the bank’ managers to expedite targets and guidance plans.


۱. Azadi Moghaddam Arani, Abbas; Amin Naseri, Mohammad Reza; and Ghodsipour, Seyed Hassan (2004). Model Evaluation of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering. .AHP Bank Loans Using Technique
٢. Alam Tabriz, Akbar; and Bagherzadeh, Mohammad (2010). Fuzzy Network Analysis Process Decision Making Model for .86-57, Strategic Supplier Selection. Journal of Business Research, No. 54
٣. Nili, Masoud; and Sabzevari, Hassan (2008). Estimation and Comparison of Logit Credit Rating Model by Method.110-117, Sharif Scientific and Research Journal, No. 43 (AHP) Hierarchical Analysis
4. Albayrak, E., & Erensal, Y. C. (2005). A bank selection study decision in
Turkey using the extended fuzzy AHP method. In 35th Internationalconference
on computers and industrial engineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
5. Chen, L.Y., & Wang, T-C. (2009). Optimizing partners' choice in IS / IT
outsourcing projects: VIKOR's fuzzy strategic decision. International
Journal of Production Economics, 120, 233–242.
6. Chung, S-H., Lee, H.I., & Pearn, W.L. (2005). Product mix optimization for
semiconductor manufacturing based on AHP and ANP analysis. International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25, 1144–1156.
7. Erensal, Y.C., Öncan, T., & Demircan, M.L. (2006). Determining the key
capabilities in technology management using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process:
A case study of Turkey. Information Sciences, 176, 2755–2770.
8. Kackar, R.N. (1985). Off-line quality control, parameter design and the Taguchi
method. Journal of Quality Technology, 17, 176–188.
9. Lin, C-T., & Tsai, M-C. (2010). Location choice for direct foreign investment in
new hospitals in China by using ANP and TOPSIS. Quality & Quantity, 44,
10. Liu, E., & Hsiao, S-W. (2006). ANP-GP approach for product variety design.
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 29, 216–255.
11. Meade, L.M., & Sarkis, J. (1999). Analyzing organizational project alternatives
for agile manufacturing processes — An analytical network approach.
International Journal of Production Research, 37, 241–261.
12. Opricovic, S. (1998). Multi-criteria optimization of civil engineering systems.
Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering.
13. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM
methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of
Operational Research, 156, 445–455.
14. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison
with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178,
15. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw Hill.
16. Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: the
analytic network process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
17. Sanayei, A., S. Mousavi, S. F., & Yazdankhah, A. (2010). Group decision
making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment.
Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 24–30.