Analysis of Consumer Perspectives in End-of-Life Management of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Using Twitter Data

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph. D Candidate, Management & Accounting Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University.

2 Professor, Management & Accounting Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University.

3 Assistant Professor of Management at the Faculty of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University

10.48308/jimp.14.4.37

Abstract

Introduction: In today’s digital age, the rapid increase in the use of electrical and electronic devices has led to massive production of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). This trend poses serious challenges for solid waste management, making proper disposal of such waste a critical issue. According to global reports, the volume of WEEE is steadily increasing, emphasizing the need for effective waste management practices. Studies have shown that the rise in WEEE not only harms the environment but also has negative impacts on public health and natural resources. Consumers, as primary generators of this waste, play a pivotal role in its management. Therefore, understanding consumers' perspectives and behaviors regarding the disposal of WEEE is crucial for developing effective waste management strategies. This study aims to identify appropriate options for managing electrical and electronic equipment at their end-of-life stage. It seeks to analyze and identify best practices for managing such waste.
Methods: This research adopts a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative methods. In the quantitative phase, data collected from Twitter (approximately 2,905,579 tweets) between May 2019 and April 2022 were analyzed. These data included consumers’ opinions and perspectives on WEEE management. Furthermore, the study employed the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to evaluate different end-of-life options. This technique enables a more precise analysis of factors influencing consumer choices and identifies the best options. Based on the findings, various factors—such as accessibility to recycling centers, awareness of disposal methods, distrust in governments, financial incentives, charitable contributions, and concerns about data security—directly influence consumers’ decisions.
These factors significantly shape consumer behavior regarding WEEE and, consequently, their end-of-life choices. Additionally, the analyses reveal that awareness of proper disposal methods and the availability of suitable recycling infrastructure can significantly impact consumer decision-making.
Results and discussion: The study identifies four end-of-life options for WEEE: reuse, repair, recycling, and disposal. Using the FAHP technique, the relationships between these factors were examined, and the most suitable end-of-life option was identified based on factors influencing consumer participation in waste management. The results serve as a valuable tool for managing WEEE and contribute to the development of effective end-of-life strategies. These strategies will foster a more sustainable approach to WEEE management.
Conclusions: Finally, the research recommends that policymakers and relevant stakeholders design comprehensive educational and awareness programs to enhance consumer knowledge about WEEE management methods. Such initiatives can help promote a culture of sustainable waste management and encourage consumers to adopt more environmentally friendly options. These efforts will play a key role in reducing the negative impacts of WEEE on the environment and public health.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Aslani Liayi, V., Abedi, S., Iradjpour, A., Ehtesham, R. (2021). Proposing a Model for Evaluating Multi-Capabilities of Sustainable Supply Chain Based on Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 11(3), 107-129. doi: 10.52547/jimp.11.3.107 (In persian).
  2. Agrawal, S., Singh, R. K., Murtaza, Q. (2018). Reverse supply chain issues in Indian electronics industry: a case study. Journal of Remanufacturing8(3), 115-129.
  3. Awasthi, A. K., Cucchiella, F., D'Adamo, I., Li, J., Rosa, P., Terzi, S., Zeng, X. (2018). Modelling the correlations of e-waste quantity with economic increase. Science of the Total Environment, 613, 46-53.
  4. Bernstad, A., la Cour Jansen, J., Aspegren, H. (2011). Property-close source separation of hazardous waste and waste electrical and electronic equipment–A Swedish case study. Waste Management31(3), 536-543.
  5. Bhattacharjya, J., Ellison, A., Tripathi, S. (2016). An exploration of logistics-related customer service provision on Twitter: The case of e-retailers. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management46(6/7), 659-680.
  6. Chae, B. K. (2015). Insights from hashtag# supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 247-259.
  7. Corsini, F., Gusmerotti, N. M., Frey, M. (2020). Consumer’s circular behaviors in relation to the purchase, extension of life, and end of life management of electrical and electronic products: A review. Sustainability12(24), 10443.
  8. Farokh, M. (2023). Designing a Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chain Model Considering Carbon Tax and Technology Selection in the Battery Industry. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 13(4), 46-84. https://doi.org/10.48308/jimp.13.4.46 (In persian).
  9. Forti, V., Baldé, C. P., Kuehr, R., & Bel, G. (2020). The global e-waste monitor 2020. Quantities, flows, and the circular economy potential, 1-119.
  10. Frempong, J., Chai, J., Ampaw, E. M., Amofah, D. O., Ansong, K. W. (2020). The relationship among customer operant resources, online value co-creation and electronic-word-of-mouth in solid waste management marketing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119228.
  11. Galante, A. M. S., Campos, L. L. (2012). Mapping radiation fields in containers for industrial γ-irradiation using polycarbonate dosimeters. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 70(7), 1264-1266.
  12. Guo, J., Tang, B., Huo, Q., Liang, C., Gen, M. (2021). Fuzzy programming of dual recycling channels of sustainable multi-objective waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) based on triple bottom line (TBL) theory. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering46(10), 10231-10244.
  13. Govindan, K., Darbari, J. D., Agarwal, V., Jha, P. C. (2017). Fuzzy multi-objective approach for optimal selection of suppliers and transportation decisions in an eco-efficient closed loop supply chain network. Journal of Cleaner Production165, 1598-1619.
  14. Ghanadpour, S. H., Shokouhyar, S., Pourabbasi, M. (2022). Effective end‑of‑life (EOL) products management in mobile phone industry with using Twitter data analysis perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02529-7
  15. Huisman, J. (2012). Eco-efficiency evaluation of WEEE take-back systems. Waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) handbook, Woodhead Publishing. 93-119.
  16. Islam, M. T., Huda, N. (2018). Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)/E-waste: A comprehensive literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling137, 48-75.
  17. Jiang, P., Van Fan, Y., Klemeš, J. J. (2021). Data analytics of social media publicity to enhance household waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105146.
  18. Jayasiri, G., Herat, S., Kaparaju, P. (2023). Management of Small WEEE: Future Directions for Australia. Sustainability, 15(18), 13543.
  19. Jayasiri, G., Herat, S., Kaparaju, P. (2024). Repair and Reuse or Recycle: What Is Best for Small WEEE in Australia? Sustainability, 16(7), 3035.
  20. Knickmeyer, D. (2020). Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. Journal of cleaner production245, 118605.
  21. Kumar, A., & Chandrahasan, R. (2023). Impact of heavy metals from electronic waste on bird species concerning biodiversity: A case study in Bellandur lake, Bengaluru, India. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 10(3): 267-272. http://dx.doi.org/%2010.34172/EHEM.2023.30.
  22. Lee, L. C., Zhang, L., Chen, X., Gui, S., Zhou, S. (2023). An overview study on management and implementation of WEEE in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(9), 10285-10300.
  23. Lamah, L., Degny, B. F., Yable, D. D., Haba, C. T. (2024). Critical analysis of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) management in Côte d’Ivoire: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Mater Environment Science, 15(3), 427, 440.
  24. Mintz, K. K., Henn, L., Park, J., Kurman, J. (2019). What predicts household waste management behaviors? Culture and type of behavior as moderators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 11-18.
  25. Miliute-Plepiene, J., Hage, O., Plepys, A., Reipas, A. (2016). What motivates households recycling behaviour in recycling schemes of different maturity? Lessons from Lithuania and Sweden. Resources, Conservation and Recycling113, 40-52.
  26. Narimaani Gh., Issa F., Faghfari Farahmand, N., Pilevari, N., Rahmani, K., Motedal, M. R., (2021). Design of a fuzzy inference system for evaluating the green supply chain of export-oriented manufacturing companies, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 11(3), 125-144. (In persian).
  27. Nnorom, I. C., Osibanjo, O. (2008). Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries. Resources, conservation and recycling52(6), 843-858.
  28. Rompf, S. A. (2014). System trust and cooperation: the case of recycling behavior.
  29. Shevchenko, T., Laitala, K., Danko, Y. (2019). Understanding consumer E-waste recycling behavior: introducing a new economic incentive to increase the collection rates. Sustainability11(9), 2656.
  30. Singh, A., Shukla, N., Mishra, N. (2018). Social media data analytics to improve supply chain management in food industries. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review114, 398-415.
  31. Soleimani, H., Govindan, K., Saghafi, H., Jafari, H. (2017). Fuzzy multi-objective sustainable and green closed-loop supply chain network design. Computers & industrial engineering109, 191-203.
  32. Sun, Y. (2022). Social Media and Influence Detection: A Literature Review on Twitter.
  33. Sun, Y., Leng, K., Xiong, H. (2022). Research on the influencing factors of consumers’ green purchase behavior in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 69,
  34. Shokouhyar, S., Shahrasbi, A. (2021). Revealing the reality behind consumers’ participation in WEEE treatment schemes: a mixed method approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1-32.
  35. Shoukohyar, S., Seddigh, M. R. (2020). Uncovering the dark and bright sides of implementing collaborative forecasting throughout sustainable supply chains: An exploratory approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change158, 120059.
  36. Tansel, B. (2017). From electronic consumer products to e-wastes: Global outlook, waste quantities, recycling challenges. Environment international98, 35-45.
  37. Varotto, A., Spagnolli, A. (2017). Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology51, 168-188.
  38. Wang, Q., Wang, X. (2022). An Expert Decision-Making System for Identifying Development Barriers in Chinese Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Recycling Industry. Sustainability, 14(24), 16721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416721.
  39. Wath, S. B., Vaidya, A. N., Dutt, P. S., Chakrabarti, T. (2010). A roadmap for development of sustainable E-waste management system in India. Science of the Total Environment409(1), 19-3.
  40. Ylä-Mella, J., Keiski, R. L., Pongrácz, E. (2015). Electronic waste recovery in Finland: Consumers’ perceptions towards recycling and re-use of mobile phones. Waste management45, 374-384.
  41. Zuo, L., Wang, C., Sun, Q. (2020). Sustaining WEEE collection business in China: The case of online to offline (O2O) development strategies. Waste Management101, 222-230.