Journal of Industrial Management Perspective

Journal of Industrial Management Perspective

Identifying and prioritizing the challenges of sustainable supply chain management of electric vehicles in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hesam KordRostami 1
Mohammad Rostami 2
1 Graduated, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
10.48308/jimp.16.2.180
Abstract
Introduction. The transportation industry, as one of the largest consumers of fossil fuels, significantly contributes to environmental pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. The development and commercialization of electric vehicles (EVs) have emerged as a key strategy to reduce air pollution, decrease dependence on fossil fuels, and transition toward clean transportation. However, the widespread adoption of EVs is not merely a technological transformation; it requires the design and management of a sustainable, efficient, and integrated supply chain capable of simultaneously addressing economic, social, and environmental challenges. In Iran, despite some preliminary studies and limited initiatives by domestic automakers, the development of this industry faces numerous obstacles. A systematic review of the literature reveals that previous studies have largely addressed technological, economic, or environmental challenges unidimensionally, with few studies providing a comprehensive and simultaneous identification and prioritization of these challenges within an integrated framework at the supply chain level of Iran's automotive industry. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to identify and prioritize the sustainable supply chain management challenges of electric vehicles in Iran, emphasizing the role of the automaker as the focal firm of the supply chain.
Methods. This research is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical survey in terms of execution. The study employs a mixed-method (qualitative-quantitative) approach. In the qualitative phase, 33 initial challenges across three dimensions (economic, social, and environmental) were identified through a targeted literature review using relevant keywords in Scopus and Noor databases. Subsequently, the fuzzy Delphi technique was applied in two rounds with the participation of 17 experts (academic experts in industrial management and industrial engineering, and industry experts including managers and senior specialists in production, logistics, and planning from Iran Khodro and Saipa companies) to screen and refine these challenges. In the quantitative phase, the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) with Chang's extent analysis approach was employed to determine the importance and priority of the final challenges. All quantitative analyses were performed in the Excel software environment using Visual Basic coding.
Results and Discussion. The fuzzy Delphi results indicated that out of 33 initial challenges, 18 challenges achieved the necessary threshold (defuzzified mean above 0.7), and the expert disagreement between the two rounds was less than 0.1, indicating a high consensus among the expert panel. The FAHP prioritization results revealed that among the three main sustainability dimensions, economic challenges ranked first with a normalized weight of 0.562, followed by environmental challenges (0.242) and social challenges (0.196). At the sub-criteria level of the economic dimension, "EV battery technology challenges" obtained the highest priority (0.713), followed by "product cost" (0.602). "Challenges of EV parts supply" (0.398), "high infrastructure costs" (0.375), and "production challenges" (0.269) occupied subsequent ranks. In the social dimension, "social acceptance challenge" was identified as the most significant factor (0.495), followed by "after-sales services" (0.467) and "unfavorable social brand image of EVs" (0.320). In the environmental dimension, "environmental pollution of batteries" ranked first (0.525), with "battery recycling" (0.456) and "environmental challenges of manufacturing and production" (0.277) following. The inconsistency rates for all pairwise comparisons were calculated to be below 0.1, confirming the reliability of the results. The discussion section further elaborates on why economic priorities dominate in Iran due to structural factors such as currency fluctuations, dependence on imported battery technology, and insufficient government incentives.
Conclusions. This research provides a comprehensive and prioritized framework of sustainable supply chain challenges for electric vehicles in Iran. The findings emphasize that focusing on battery technology development, reducing product costs, and managing social acceptance are essential prerequisites for success in this area. Practical recommendations are presented across short-term, medium-term, and long-term horizons.
Keywords
Battery Technology
Electric Vehicle
Fuzzy AHP
Fuzzy Delphi
Social Acceptance
Supply Chain Management
Sustainable Supply Chain
Subjects
1.     Abdulmaleki Samani, H., & Mir Hosseinian, S. (2017). Design challenges of electric vehicle body and existing solutions. First International Conference on Modern Propulsion Systems (Focus on Electric Vehicles), Tehran. (In Persian)
2.     Ahmad, F., Alam, M. S., Alsaidan, I. S., & Shariff, S. M. (2020). Battery swapping station for electric vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IET Smart Grid, 3(3), 280-286.
3.     Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: Benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation, 13, 2-23.
4.     Ares Sheikhi, A., Mahmoudi, S., & Shojaei, S. (2017). Analysis of charging technologies and infrastructure challenges for electric vehicles. Islamic Council Research Center, 82. (In Persian)
5.     Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Iranmanesh, M., Ghobakhloo, M., Samad, S., Alghamdi, A., Almulihi, A., & Mohd, S. (2022). Drivers and barriers of electric vehicle usage in Malaysia: A DEMATEL approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 105965.
6.     Badpa, H., Dehghan Dehnavi, H., & Nasirian, M. (2018). Examining and prioritizing the challenges of using supply chain management in improving industrial project performance. Second International Conference on Management, Industrial Engineering, Economics and Accounting. (In Persian)
7.     Baran, R., & Legey, L. F. (2013). The introduction of electric vehicles in Brazil: Impacts on oil and electricity consumption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(5), 907-917.
8.     Deng, H. (1999). Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 21(3), 215-231.
9.     Egbue, O., Long, S., & Samaranayake, V. A. (2017). Mass deployment of sustainable transportation: Evaluation of factors that influence electric vehicle adoption. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(2), 193-223.
10.  Elah Moradi, E., Mirzamohammadi, S., & Naini Foundation, A. (2019). Factors affecting consumers' willingness to pay for electric cars in Iran. Energy Policy and Planning Research, 9(18), 29-48. (In Persian)
11.  Fink-Hafner, D., Dagen, T., Doušak, M., Novak, M., & Hafner-Fink, M. (2019). Delphi method: Strengths and weaknesses. Metodološki Zvezki, 16(2), 1-19.
12.  Goel, S., Sharma, R., & Kumar Rathore, A. (2021). A review on barriers and challenges of electric vehicles in India and vehicle-to-grid optimization. Transportation Engineering, 4, 100057.
13.  Hong, J., Zhang, Y., & Ding, M. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 181-190.
14.  Inkar, G., Jadhav, G., Kamthe, A., & Ghode, S. (2022). Review on challenges of electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 66, 147-155.
15.  International Energy Agency (IEA). (2025). Global EV Outlook 2025. Paris: International Energy Agency.
16.  Khoshnoudi, M. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing effective factors on sustainable supply chain performance. Second International Conference on New Developments in Management, Economics and Accounting. (In Persian)
17.  Krishna, M. K. (2022). Identifying barriers to electric vehicle adoption: Systematic review, economy and perception. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, 4, 61-89.
18.  Kumar Tarie, P., Chand, P., & Gupta, G. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291(1), 101-131.
19.  Lee, J. H., Chakraborty, D., Hardman, S. J., & Tal, G. (2020). Exploring electric vehicle charging patterns: Mixed usage of charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.
20.  Maadi Roudsari, M. H., Tabatabaian, S. H., & Radfar, R. (2023). Pathology of the country's automobile industry using grounded theory strategy and providing solutions for improvement. Danesh Investment Science Quarterly, 12(1), 125-138. (In Persian)
21.  Mohammadi, A., & Hosseini, S. (2023). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in supply chain risk assessment: A case study of the automotive industry. Industrial Management Perspective, 14(2), 45-68. (In Persian)
22.  Mubasheri, S., & Khajezadeh, A. (2013). Evaluating environmental and economic effects of load response resources and electric vehicles in production planning. National Power Plant Conference, 7. (In Persian)
23.  Müller, M., Wietschel, M., & Gnann, T. (2024). The electric vehicle supply chain ecosystem: Changing roles of automotive suppliers. Sustainability, 16(4), 1570.
24.  Muzir, N. A. Q., Mojumder, M. R. H., Hasanuzzaman, M., & Selvaraj, J. (2022). Challenges of electric vehicles and their prospects in Malaysia: A comprehensive review. Sustainability, 14, 52-69.
25.  Nilashi, M., Iranmanesh, M., & Ghobakhloo, M. (2022). Drivers and barriers of electric vehicle usage in Malaysia: A DEMATEL approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 177, 1-26.
26.  Pireh Babi, S., Moseibi, A., & Zandi, M. (2022). Electric vehicle development scenarios in Iran using system dynamics method. Sustainable Energy Systems Quarterly, 2(1), 1-17. (In Persian)
27.  Rajabi Farjad, H., & Nazari, M. (2020). The effect of knowledge management on organizational performance with the role of sustainable supply chain management. Scientific Thought Ready, 19(75), 141-168. (In Persian)
28.  Rezaei, M., & Karimi, N. (2022). Identification and prioritization of supply chain risks using a hybrid fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) approach. Industrial Management Perspective, 13(3), 89-112. (In Persian)
29.  Rokneddini, S. A., Andalib Ardakani, D., Zare Ahmadabadi, H., & Hosseini Bamkan, S. M. (2023). Modeling the Enablers of Industry 4.0 in the Implementation of a Sustainable Supply Chain with fuzzy DEMATEL-ANP. Journal of industrial management perspective, 13(1), 141-172. (In Persian)
30.  Shishehbori, A., & Shojaei, O. A. (2022). The impact of sustainable supply chain management on organizational effectiveness: The mediating role of total quality management, 4(1), 59-78. (In Persian)
31.  Virmani, N., Agarwal, V., Karuppiah, K., Agarwal, S., Raut, R. D., & Paul, S. K. (2023). Mitigating barriers to adopting electric vehicles in an emerging economy context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137557.
32.  Wang, Z., Ching, T. W., Huang, S., Wang, H., & Xu, T. (2021). Challenges faced by electric vehicle motors and their solutions. IEEE Access, 9, 5228-5249.
33.  Wu, Y., Jia, W., Li, L., & Song, Z. (2019). Risk assessment of electric vehicle supply chain based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Energy, 182(1), 397-411.
34.  Yazdanipour, S., & Latif Shabgahi, G. (2013). Challenges in using electric vehicles as power reserve in distribution networks. 16th Iranian Electrical Engineering Student Conference, Kazerun. (In Persian)
35.  Zhang, L., Li, X., & Zhao, Y. (2025). Integrating sustainability across the lifecycle of electric vehicle batteries: Circular supply chain challenges and policy implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 198, 114567.