ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Building Information Modeling Adoption Model in Iran
Iran's construction industry has faced some problems in recent years, including rework, high costs and design errors. Engineers in this field have always emphasized the use of modern methods of building modern technologies and technologies to improve quality, reduce time, cost and increase productivity. One of these technologies is building information modeling technology, which has been very difficult to adopt and implement in this country. The purpose of this research is to present a systemic and holistic model to analyze the dynamics of adoption and implementation of this technology in Iran. For this purpose, a hybrid research method is designed, so that in the first phase using the grounded theory, a conceptual model of technology adoption is presented, and then using a system dynamics approach, a quantitative mathematical model with simulated decision consequences is presented. Four policies under the scenarios were implemented on the model. The results show that government support consisting of a set of measures is the most efficient solution to develop adoption and implementation of this technology.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87479_cbfe87ba22d3c53f9b486e0041922831.pdf
2020-03-20
9
39
10.52547/jimp.10.1.9
Building Information Modeling
Grounded theory
system dynamics
Technology Adoption
Simulation
Mahdi
Bastan
mbastan@eyc.ac.ir
1
Lecturer, University of Eyvanekey, Garmsar.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Masoumeh
Zarei
2
M.A., University of Eyvanekey, Garmsar.
AUTHOR
Ali Mohammad
Ahmadvand
3
Professor, University of Eyvanekey, Garmsar.
AUTHOR
Alvani, S. M., Danaeifard, H., Azar, A. (2016). Qualitative Research Methodology: A Comprehensive Approach. Saffar Press. Tehran (in Persian).
1
Bastan, M., Shakouri G., H. (2019). Model-Based Assessment of Energy Dependency Policies: A System Dynamics Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(2), 81-106 (in Persian).
2
Bastan, M., Abbasi, E., Ahamadvand, A., Ramazani K, R. (2018). A Simulation Model of Mobile Banking Acceptance by Bank Customers Using the System Dynamics Approach. Industrial Management Studies, 16(50), 257-284. Doi: 10.22054/jims.2018.9113 (in Persian).
3
Bastan, M., Zadfallah, E., Ahmadvand, A. (2019). Modeling Evaluation of Clinical Risk Management Policies. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(38), 69-97 (in Persian).
4
Bastan, M., Azizi, L., Grösser, S., Sheikhahmadi, F., (2018). Analysis of Development Policies in Occupational Health and Safety Management System: A System Dynamics Approach. The 2nd IEOM European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Paris, France.
5
Bank, L., McCarthy, M., Thompson, P., Menassa, C. (2010). Integrating BIM with system dynamics as a decision-making framework for sustainable building design and operation. The First International Conference on Sustainable Urbanization (ICSU 2010), Hong Kong, China.
6
Bui, N., Merschbrock, C., Munkvold, E. (2016). A review of Building Information Modelling for construction in developing countries. Procedia Engineering, 164, 487-494.
7
Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2017). Review of Economic Trends, Report of Economic investigation Office, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
8
Chritamara, S., Ogunlana, O., Bach, I. (2002). System dynamics modeling of design and build construction projects. Construction Innovation. 2(4), 269-295.
9
Eadie, R., Browne, M., Odeyinka, H., McKeown, C., McNiff, S. (2013). Throughout the UK BIM implementation construction project lifecycle: An analysis. Automation in Construction, 36, 145-151.
10
Eastman, M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., Liston, K. (2011). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors: John Wiley & Sons.
11
Gal, U., Jensen, T. (2008). Organisational identity and the appropriation of information systems. International Conference on Information System (ICIS 2008), Paris, France.
12
Gao, G., Guan, C. (2016). Adoption of the Building Information Modeling (BIM) for construction project effectiveness: The review of BIM benefits. American Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 4(3), 74-79.
13
Golabchi, K., Nourzaei, E., Golabchi, A., Gharouni Jafari, K. (2016). Building Information Modeling, University of Tehran Press, (in Persian).
14
Homayounfar, M., Nahavandi, B., Golbazzadeh, P. (2018). Designing a Dynamic Model for New Product Development by Emphasizing on Bass Diffusion Theory. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 8(1), 137-162 (in Persian).
15
Hosseini M., Azari, E., Tivendale, L., Banihashemi, S., Chileshe, N. (2016). Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Iran: an exploratory study. Journal of engineering, project, and production management, 6(2), 78-89(in Persian).
16
Lee, S., Yu, J., Jeong, D. (2015). BIM acceptance model in construction organizations. Journal of management in engineering, 31(3), 1-13, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000252
17
Kassem, M., Succar, B., Dawood, N. (2013). A proposed approach to comparing the BIM maturity of countries. The 30th International Conference on Applications of IT in the AEC Industry. Beijing, China
18
Kasiralvalad,E., Bastan, M., Abniki, H, Ahmadvand, A. (2016). Simulation Analysis of Brain Drain in Iran using System Dynamics Approach, The 34th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Delft, The Netherlands.
19
Mathews, V., Varghese, K., & Mahalingam, A. (2014). A Study on Significance of System Dynamics Approach in Understanding Adoption of Information Technology in Building Construction Projects. The 31st International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC 2014), Sydney, Australia.
20
Manghasarian, E., Nekooie, M. (2016). Building Information Modeling and assessing and prioritizing lack of its applicability in Iranian construction industry. Journal of Engineering & Construction Management, 1(1), 6-11.
21
Mehran, D. (2016). Exploring the Adoption of BIM in the UAE Construction Industry for AEC Firms. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1110-1118.
22
Mamter, S., Abdolaziz, A., Zulkepli, J. (2017). Root causes occurrence of low BIM adoption in Malaysia: System dynamics modelling approach. The 3rd International Conference on Construction and Building Engineering. Palembang, Indonesia.
23
Ngowtanasuwan, G., Hadikusumo, I. (2017). System dynamics modelling for BIM adoption in Thai architectural and engineering design industry. Construction Innovation. 17(4), 457-474
24
Rafieian, A., Shafiei, M. (2014). Management of Building Information Modeling, The 1st National Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Development, Yazd, Iran (in Persian).
25
Rabieh, M., Salari, H., Karami, M., Ziyaei, M., Yasoubi, A. (2017). Causal Loop Model for Problem of Traffic Accident: The System Dynamics Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 7(1), 115-143 (in Persian).
26
Rogers, J., Chong, H., Preece, C. (2015). Adoption of building information modelling technology (BIM) perspectives from Malaysian engineering consulting services firms. Engineering. Construction and Architectural Management, 22(4), 424-445.
27
Sotodeh Bidokhti, A. (2015). Review of Information and Communication Technology in Building Project Management, The 1st International conference on Economics, Management and Accounting with Value Creation Approach, Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
28
Smart Market Report (2012). The business value of bim in north america multi year trend analysis and user ratings 2007-2012. McGraw Hill Constraction.
29
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Newbury Park,Sage.
30
Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw Hill
31
Smyth, R. (2005). Broadband videoconferencing as a tool for learner‐centred distance learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 805-820.
32
Son, H., Lee, S., Hwang, N., Kim, C. (2014). The adoption of building information modeling in the design organization: An empirical study of architects in Korean design firms. The International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Sydney, Astralia.
33
Tabarzan, T., Bastan, M., Ahmadvand, A. (2017). The Model of Chronic Cardiovascular Diseases Growth and Effective Control Costs Management: A qualitative System Dynamics Approach, The 13th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (IIEC2017), Babolsar, Iran
34
Taghizadeh, K., Soltanpanah, E. (2012). Evaluation of the Use of New Technologies in Renovation of Deteriorated Urban Areas in Tehran. Urban Management, 10 (29), 213-234, (in Persian).
35
Wong, J., Wang, X., Li, H., Chan, G. (2014). A review of cloud-based BIM technology in the construction sector. Journal of information technology in construction 19(1), 281-291.
36
Zadfallah, E., Bastan, M., Ahmadvand, A. (2017). A Qualitative System Dynamics Approach to Clinical Risk Management, The 13th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (IIEC2017), Babolsar, Iran.
37
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Implementation of Accelerating Benders Decomposition Algorithm for Supply Chain Considering New Product Development and Customer Relationship Management
New product development is an essential requirement in any company and every company needs to develop its technology and products to survive in a competitive market. Most organizations nowadays have more than ever realized that relying on traditional competitive levers such as quality enhancement, cost reduction and differentiation is not enough to provide products and services, but it is important to pay attention to new product entry as well as early product exit. In this research we examine supply chain network design when a new product is added to the product line. Also, the important topic of customer relationship management, which is one of the factors driving the increase in product sales as a result of profitability for the organization, has been designed as a mathematical model. Finally, an improved version of the benders decomposition algorithm is presented as the accelerating benders for the proposed problem. The computational results show the superior performance of the solution method.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87480_51dc8d8dde50d0a2a93f77b703333c83.pdf
2020-03-20
41
63
10.52547/jimp.10.1.41
Supply Chain Design
New Product Development
Customer Relationship Management
Mathemtical Model
Benders Decomposition Algorithm
Esmaeel
Rezaei
rezaei_esmaeel@yahoo.com
1
M.Sc. Student, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology.
AUTHOR
Mohammad Mahdi
Paydar
paydar@nit.ac.ir
2
Associate Professor, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Abdul Sattar
Safaei
s.safaei@nit.ac.ir
3
Associate Professor, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology.
AUTHOR
Afrouzy, A.Z., Nasseri, S.H., Mahdavi, I., & Paydar, M.M. (2016). A fuzzy stochastic multi-objective optimization model to configure a supply chain considering new product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(17), 7545-7570.
1
Altuntas, S., Beşir Özsoy, E., & Mor, Ş. (2019). Innovative new product development: a case study. Procedia Computer Science, 158(1), 214-221.
2
Amini, M., & Li, H. (2011). Supply chain configuration for diffusion of new products: an integrated optimization approach. Omega, 39(3), 313-322.
3
Billington, C., Lee, H. L., & Tang, C. S. (1998). Product rollover: process, strategies and opportunities. Sloan Management Review, 39(1), 23-30.
4
Chaharsoghi, K., & Ashrafi, M. (2014). Integrating Sustainability into Supplier Selection and Order Quantity Allocation. Journal of Industrial ManagementPerspectives, 3(12), 63-85 (In Persian).
5
Cheng, C., & Yang, M. (2019). Creative process engagement and new product performance: The role of new product development speed and leadership encouragement of creativity. Journal of Business Research, 99(1), 215-225.
6
Cruz-Jesus, F., Pinheiro, A., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Understanding CRM adoption stages: empirical analysis building on the TOE framework. Computers in Industry, 109(1), 1-13.
7
Forza, C., Salvador, F., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2005). Coordinating product design, process design, and supply chain design decisions: Part B. Coordinating approaches, tradeoffs, and future research directions. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3), 319-324.
8
Hajli, N., Tajvidi, M., Gbadamosi. A., & Nadeem, W. (2019). Understanding market agility for new product success with big data analytics. Industrial Marketing Management, (In press).
9
Hasani, P., & Mohammaditabar, D. (2018). A Multi Period Lot-Sizing Model in Three-Echelon Supply Chain by Considering Payment Methods and Joint Replenishment of Inventory Items. Journal of Industrial ManagementPerspectives, 8(31), 141-165 (In Persian).
10
Horvat, A., Granato, G., Fogliano, V., & Luning, P. (2019). Understanding consumer data use in new product development and the product life cycle in European food firms – An empirical study. Food Quality and Preference, 76(1), 20-32.
11
Jafarian, M., & Bashiri, M. (2014). Supply chain dynamic configuration as a result of new product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(3), 1133-1146.
12
Karakostas, B., Kardaras, D., & Papathanassiou, E. (2005). The state of CRM adoption by the financial services in the UK: an empirical investigation. Information & Management, 42(6), 853-863.
13
Kettunen, J., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Degraeve, Z., & De Reyck, B. (2015). New product development flexibility in a competitive environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1), 892-904.
14
Koyuncu, E., & Erol, R. (2015). PSO based approach for scheduling NPD projects including overlapping process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85(1), 316-327.
15
Liou, J. J. (2009). A novel decision rules approach for customer relationship management of the airline market. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 4374-4381.
16
Liu, S., Papageorgiou, L.G., & Shah, N. (2020). Optimal design of low-cost supply chain networks on the benefits of new product formulations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139(1), 1-42.
17
Naraharisetti, P. K., & Karimi, I. A. (2010). Supply chain redesign and new process introduction in multipurpose plants. Chemical Engineering Science, 65(8), 2596-2607.
18
Nepal, B., Monplaisir, L., & Famuyiwa, O. (2011). A multi-objective supply chain configuration model for new products. International Journal of Production Research, 49(23), 7107-7134.
19
Ouhimmou, M., Rönnqvist, M., & Lapointe, L. (2019). Assessment of Sustainable Integration of New Products into Value Chain through a Generic Decision Support Model: An Application to the Forest Value Chain. Omega, (In press).
20
Petersen, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of operations management, 23(3), 371-388.
21
Petrick, I. J., & Echols, A. E. (2004). Technology road mapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 81-100.
22
Radfar, A., & Mohammaditabar, D. (2019). Bi-Objective Optimization of Vendor Managed Inventory Problem in a Multi Echelon Green Supply Chain. Journal of Industrial ManagementPerspectives, 9(35), 109-134 (In Persian).
23
Thakur-Wernz, P., Bruyaka, O., & Contractor, F. (2019). Antecedents and relative performance of sourcing choices for new product development projects. Technovation, (In press).
24
Tracey, M., & Neuhaus, R. (2013). Purchasing's role in global new product-process development projects. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 98-105.
25
Yu, L., Duan, Y., & Fan, T. (2020). Innovation performance of new products in China's high-technology industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 219(1), 204-215.
26
Van Kleef, E., van Trijp, H. C., & Luning, P. (2005). Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference, 16(3), 181-201.
27
Wang, J., & Shu, Y. F. (2007). A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), 1044-1061.
28
Wang, L., Jin, J.L., Zhou, K.Z., Bingxin Li, C., & Yin, E. (2020). Does customer participation hurt new product development performance? Customer role, product newness, and conflict. Journal of Business Research, 109(1), 246-259.
29
Wu, L., Heng, L., & Kun, S. (2020). Exploring the dual effect of effectuation on new product development speed and quality. Journal of Business Research, 106(1), 82-93.
30
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Providing a Mathematical Model for Periodic Projects Evaluation and Rewarding in Matrix Organizations (Case Study: Iran Argham Corporation)
Organizations and companies are always looking for accurate, timely, and quality performance of their activities and projects, often through the proper management of different dimensions of activities and projects. The topic of motivation and reward of employees and managers in project activities is part of the human resource management discussed in this article. In the mathematical model of this paper, three bases are assigned to each individual reward in each project: project strategic importance, project performance evaluation, and individual role in the project. The model provided by these fundamentals and the limitations of organizational resources assigns each individual to each reward project. How to calculate reward in a way that takes into account financial constraints, first, encourages employees to define projects that are more in line with the goals and strategies of the organization, and second, encourages them to commit to the project's quantitative and qualitative requirements. At the end and via a case study, the model is implemented in Iran Argham and the results show the improvement of company projects' performance in terms of time, cost and quality of deliverables.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87486_a13ee7dc45ba5cc0b1a5c3d3a4241cf7.pdf
2020-03-20
65
88
10.52547/jimp.10.1.65
Project Human Resource Management
Motivation
Project Reward
Matrix Structure
Project Performance Evaluation
Ali
Ferdosi Jahromi
aferdosi@chmail.ir
1
* Ph.D Student, Allameh Tabtabaei University.
AUTHOR
Saeed
Yaghoubi
yaghoubi@iust.ac.ir
2
Associate Professor, Iran University of Science & Technology.
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Alavipour, S. R., & Arditi, D. (2019). Time-cost tradeoff analysis with minimized project financing cost. Automation in Construction, 98, 110-121.
1
2. Amirkabiri, A. (2003). Strategy Management. second edition, Tehran: Negah Danesh publishers (In persian)
2
3. Amoozadeh Mahriji, Hannan, Mokhtarzadeh, Nima, Radmand, Sara. (2017). Gray Fuzzy Ideal Planning Model to balance project time, cost, risk and quality. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 3(7), 47-80 (In persian)
3
4. Arditi, D., Khisty, J., Yasamis, F. (1997). Incentive/disincentive provisions in highway contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3), 302–307
4
5. Baloi, D., Price, A.D.F. (2003). Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance. International Journal of Project Management, 21(4), 261–269
5
6. Bonyadi Naeini, Ali, Kamfiroozi, Mohamad Hasan. (2014). A Systematic Study of the Role of Human Factors on Project Success with Shapley-Dimethyl Gray Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 4(2), 27-45 (In persian)
6
7. Crawford, J. Kent (2006). Optimizing Human Capital with a Strategic Project Office. Florida: Auerbach Publications.
7
8. Eriksson, P.E., Westerberg, M. (2011). Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (2), 197–208
8
9. Feizi, M. (2006). Application of standard pmbok to evaluate project managers performance. Second International Project Management Conference (In persian)
9
Ghasemi Sa'adat Abadi, A. (2016). Providing a rewarding project efficiency model based on the benefits of engineering machine users. Third International E-Conference on Commercialization, National Development and Engineering Sciences, Tehran (In persian)
10
Haji Karimi, A., & Rangriz, H. (2001). Human Resources Management. Tehran: Trading Publishing Company (In persian)
11
Haji Mir Arab, S. M., Bagherpour, M., & Naieni, H. (2012). Designing a final reward calculation and distribution system for projects in organizations with matrix structure. Third Executive Management Conference (In persian)
12
Harris, F., McCaffer, R., Edum-Fotwe, F. (2006). Modern Construction Management. Six Edition. Oxford: Blackwell
13
Hekmat shoaar, & Arabzade, G. (2011). Designing and developing a reward system and mechanization in the port and maritime department of Imam Khomeini Port. Didgah Journal, 7(3), 28-42 (In persian)
14
Hellriegel, don, Slocum, john, woodman, Richard. (1995). Organizational behavior. New York: west publishing company
15
Jaafari, A., (1996). Twinning time and cost in incentive-based contracts. Journal of Management in Engineering, 12(4), 62–72
16
Jones, G. R., George, J. M. (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of management review, 23(3), 531-546.
17
Kandula, S. R. (2006). Performance management: Strategies, interventions, drivers. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
18
Kwak, Y.H., Smith, B.M. (2009). Managing risks in mega defense acquisition projects: performance, policy, and opportunities. International Journal of Project Management, 27(8), 812–820
19
Matthews, O., & Howell, G. A. (2005). Integrated project delivery an example of relational contracting. Lean construction journal, 2(1), 46-61.
20
Mehrabi, Ali, Rahimi, Farajollah, Salehi. Reza. (2017). Providing Performance-Based Multilevel Reward Pattern Using Promotional Method. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 7(3), 81-104 (In persian)
21
Moghadam, E. K., Sharifi, M., Rafiee, S., & Chang, Y. K. (2020). Time–Cost–Quality Trade-Off in a Broiler Production Project Using Meta-Heuristic Algorithms: A Case Study. Agriculture, 10(1), 2-18
22
Namazi, M., & Sirani, M. (2005). Experimental Investigation of Important Structures in Determining Contracts, Indicators and Bonus Parameters of Corporate Managers in Iran. Accounting and Accounting Reviews, 36(11), 65-94 (In persian)
23
Pahlavani, A., & Aslami, M. (2009). Implement a productivity-based reward system in the Bank of Industry and Mine. Sixth International Management Conference (In persian)
24
Pheng, L.S., Teo, J.A. (2004). Implementing total quality management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 20(1), 815
25
Rahmanniyay, F., & Yu, A. J. (2019). A multi-objective stochastic programming model for project-oriented human-resource management optimization. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 14(4), 231-239.
26
Rison, J. M. (2011). Strategic planning in government. public and non-profit organizations. Translation by Mahdi khademi, Tehran: Ariana ghalam publishers (In persian)
27
Rose, K. H. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)—Fifth Edition. Project management journal, 44(3), e1-e1.
28
Simons, R. (2013). Seven Strategic Questions. Translation by Masud soltani, Tehran: Ariana ghalam, (In persian)
29
Stellingwerf, R., & Zandhuis, A. (2013). ISO 21500 Guidance on project management–A Pocket Guide. Van Haren.
30
Tagizadeh Yazdi, Mohamadreza, Ghafouri, Saeed. (1395) A mathematical model for the problem of cost-time balance - environmental effects and solve it with metaheuristic algorithms of particle density and night cream, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 6(4), 97-121(In persian).
31
Thomas, W. H., Lam, R. W., Nutt, D. J., & Thase, M. E. (2018). The basics of project evaluation and lessons learned. Productivity Press.
32
Weiner, Bernard (1987). Human motivation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: California
33
Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., & Li, A. (2019). Investigating the Effects of Reward Interdependence and Nonfinancial Incentives on NPD Collaboration in Diverse Project Teams. Project Management Journal, 50(6), 641–656.
34
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
A Hybrid Approach to Develop a Structural Model of Factors Affecting Supply Chain Collaboration in Home Appliance Industry
Supply chain collaboration as a collective approach to compete against rivals, aims to improve performance of supply chain. In order to develop collaboration across supply chain it is vital to identify factors affecting collaboration and their interactions. to do so, we have proposed a hybrid methodology to develop a model of factors affecting supply chain collaboration. In first step, Systematic Literature Review was used to identify factors affecting supply chain collaboration. Then, Discrete Consensus Support Model was employed to make close consensus among experts and to select the most preferred factors. In next step interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy cognitive maps were used to develop hierarchical structure of interactions among factors and also to determine the strength of causality relations. Simultaneous use of these two methods compensates the weakness of both methods by developing a quantified structural model of factors affecting supply chain collaboration. The developed model provides useful information about relationships among factors and also the strength of these relations which facilitate the decision-making process for managers of home appliance companies to develop collaboration.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87487_8ce8eedce71a06fa31ee9b3a28778f95.pdf
2020-03-20
89
119
10.52547/jimp.10.1.89
Supply Chain Collaboration
Home Appliance Industry
Systematic Literature Review
Interpretive Structural Modeling
Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
Arash
Shahryari Nia
shahryarinia921@atu.ac.ir
1
Ph.D, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
AUTHOR
Laya
Olfat
olfat@atu.ac.ir
2
Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Maghsoud
Amiri
amiri@atu.ac.ir
3
Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
AUTHOR
Abolfazl
Kazazi
kazazi@atu.ac.ir
4
Professor, Allameh Tabataba'i University.
AUTHOR
Aggarwal, S., & Srivastava, M. K. (2016). Towards a grounded view of collaboration in Indian agri-food supply chains. British Food Journal, 118(5), 1085-1106.
1
Akintoye, A., McIntosh, G., & Fitzgerald, E. (2000). A survey of supply chain collaboration and management in the UK construction industry. European journal of purchasing & supply management, 6(3-4), 159-168.
2
Al-Refaie, A. (2014). Examining factors affect supply chain collaboration in Jordanian organizations. Journal of Management Analytics, 1(4), 317-337.
3
Barati, M. (2017). The Impact of Supply Chain Relationships Management on Competitiveness in Iranian Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in Automotive Parts Industry. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 7(2), 169-188. (In Persian)
4
Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30–42.
5
Baykasoğlu, A., & Gölcük, İ. (2017). Development of a two-phase structural model for evaluating ERP critical success factors along with a case study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 106, 256-274.
6
Boddy, D., Macbeth, D., & Wagner, B. (2000). Implementing collaboration between organizations: an empirical study of supply chain partnering. Journal of Management studies, 37(7), 1003-1018.
7
Büyüközkan, G., & Vardaloğlu, Z. (2012). Analyzing of CPFR success factors using fuzzy cognitive maps in retail industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10438-10455.
8
Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Galeano, N., & Molina, A. (2009). Collaborative networked organizations–Concepts and practice in manufacturing enterprises. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(1), 46-60.
9
Cao, M., Vonderembse, M. A., Zhang, Q., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2010). Supply chain collaboration: conceptualisation and instrument development. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22), 6613-6635.
10
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Supply chain collaborative advantage: a firm’s perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 358-367.
11
Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of operations management, 29(3), 163-180.
12
Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2016). A systematic review of supply chain knowledge management research: State of the art and research opportunities. International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 276-292.
13
Chen, M. C., Yang, T., & Li, H. C. (2007). Evaluating the supply chain performance of IT-based inter-enterprise collaboration. Information & Management, 44(6), 524-534.
14
Chong, A. Y. L., Chan, F. T., Goh, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2013). Do interorganisational relationships and knowledge-management practices enhance collaborative commerce adoption? International Journal of Production Research, 51(7), 2006-2018.
15
Chung, W. W. C., & Leung, S. W. F. (2005). Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: a case study in copper clad laminate industry. Production planning & control, 16(6), 563-574.
16
Claro, D. P., & Omta, O. (2005). Building collaborative relationships with distributors in the Dutch potted flower and plant industry. Journal of international food & agribusiness marketing, 17(2), 15-38.
17
Co, H., & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 53(2), 65.
18
Danese, P., Romano, P., & Vinelli, A. (2004). Managing business processes across supply networks: the role of coordination mechanisms. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(4-5), 165-177.
19
Daugherty, P. J., Richey, R. G., Roath, A. S., Min, S., Chen, H., Arndt, A. D., & Genchev, S. E. (2006). Is collaboration paying off for firms? Business horizons, 49(1), 61-70.
20
De Almeida, M. M. K., Marins, F. A. S., Salgado, A. M. P., Santos, F. C. A., & da Silva, S. L. (2015). Mitigation of the bullwhip effect considering trust and collaboration in supply chain management: a literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77(1-4), 495-513.
21
Derrouiche, R., Neubert, G., Bouras, A., & Savino, M. (2010). B2B relationship management: a framework to explore the impact of collaboration. Production Planning & Control, 21(6), 528-546.
22
Dung, L. T. (2015). Factors Affecting the Collaboration in Supply Chain of Mechanical Enterprises in Vietnam. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains, 6(4), 17–29.
23
Emberson, C., & Storey, J. (2006). Buyer–supplier collaborative relationships: Beyond the normative accounts. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(5), 236-245.
24
Fawcett, S. E., Fawcett, A. M., Watson, B. J., & Magnan, G. M. (2012). Peeking inside the black box: toward an understanding of supply chain collaboration dynamics. Journal of supply chain management, 48(1), 44-72.
25
Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008). A three‐stage implementation model for supply chain collaboration. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 93-112.
26
Fawcett, S. E., Wallin, C., Allred, C., Fawcett, A. M., & Magnan, G. M. (2011). Information technology as an enabler of supply chain collaboration: a dynamic‐capabilities perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 38-59.
27
Fu, H. P., Chu, K. K., Lin, S. W., & Chen, C. R. (2010). A study on factors for retailers implementing CPFR—A fuzzy AHP analysis. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 19(2), 192-209.
28
Glock, C. H. (2017). Decision support models for managing returnable transport items in supply chains: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 561-569.
29
Hanafizadeh, P., Keating, B. W., & Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2014). A systematic review of Internet banking adoption. Telematics and informatics, 31(3), 492-510.
30
Holimchayachotikul, P., Derrouiche, R., Damand, D., & Leksakul, K. (2014). Value creation through collaborative supply chain: holistic performance enhancement road map. Production Planning & Control, 25(11), 912-922.
31
Hollmann, R. L., Scavarda, L. F., & Thomé, A. M. T. (2015). Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment: a literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(7), 971–993.
32
Holweg, M., Disney, S., Holmström, J., & Småros, J. (2005). Supply chain collaboration: Making sense of the strategy continuum. European management journal, 23(2), 170-181.
33
Huang, J. J., Tzeng, G. H., & Ong, C. S. (2005). Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(6), 755-767.
34
Humphries, A. S., & Wilding, R. D. (2004). Long term collaborative business relationships: The impact of trust and C3 behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(9-10), 1107-1122.
35
Jeenanunta, C., Ueki, Y., & Visanvetchakij, T. (2013). Supply chain collaboration and firm performance in Thai automotive and electronics industries. Global Business Perspectives, 1(4), 418-432.
36
Jeng, D. J. F. (2015). Generating a causal model of supply chain collaboration using the fuzzy DEMATEL technique. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 283-295.
37
Johnsen, T. E., Miemczyk, J., & Howard, M. (2017). A systematic literature review of sustainable purchasing and supply research: Theoretical perspectives and opportunities for IMP-based research. Industrial Marketing Management, 61, 130-143.
38
Kahn, K. B., Maltz, E. N., & Mentzer, J. T. (2006). Demand collaboration: effects on knowledge creation, relationships, and supply chain performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 191-221.
39
Kumar, G., & Banerjee, R. N. (2012). Collaboration in supply chain. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(8), 897–918.
40
Kumar, G., & Banerjee, R. N. (2014). Supply chain collaboration index: an instrument to measure the depth of collaboration. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(2), 184–204.
41
Kumar, G., Banerjee, R. N., Meena, P. L., & Ganguly, K. (2016). Collaborative culture and relationship strength roles in collaborative relationships: a supply chain perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(5), 587–599.
42
Lehoux, N., D’Amours, S., & Langevin, A. (2014). Inter-firm collaborations and supply chain coordination: review of key elements and case study. Production Planning & Control, 25(10), 858-872.
43
Liao, S. H., & Kuo, F. I. (2014). The study of relationships between the collaboration for supply chain, supply chain capabilities and firm performance: A case of the Taiwan׳ s TFT-LCD industry. International journal of production economics, 156, 295-304.
44
Lin, H. F. (2014). The impact of socialization mechanisms and technological innovation capabilities on partnership quality and supply chain integration. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(2), 285-306.
45
Ling, Li. (2012). Effects of enterprise technology on supply chain collaboration: analysis of China-linked supply chain, Enterprise Information Systems, 6(1), 55-77.
46
Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Maccarrone, P., & Caniato, F. (2017). Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 299-315.
47
Manthou, V., Vlachopoulou, M., & Folinas, D. (2004). Virtual e-Chain (VeC) model for supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 241-250.
48
Matopoulos, A., Vlachopoulou, M., Manthou, V., & Manos, B. (2007) A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(3), 177–186.
49
McCarthy, T. M., & Golicic, S. L. (2002). Implementing collaborative forecasting to improve supply chain performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(6), 431–454.
50
McLaren, T., Head, M., & Yuan, Y. (2002). Supply chain collaboration alternatives: understanding the expected costs and benefits. Internet Research, 12(4), 348–364.
51
Min, S., Roath, A. S., Daugherty, P. J., Genchev, S. E., Chen, H., Arndt, A. D., & Richey, R. G. (2005). Supply chain collaboration: what’s happening? The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 237–256.
52
Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic management journal, 15(2), 135-152.
53
Narayanan, S., Narasimhan, R., & Schoenherr, T. (2015). Assessing the contingent effects of collaboration on agility performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 33, 140-154.
54
Nyaga, G. N., Whipple, J. M., & Lynch, D. F. (2010). Examining supply chain relationships: Do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 101–114.
55
Olfat, L., Amiri, M., Raeesi Vanani, I., Esmaeilzadeh, M. (2019). Identifying and Categoring Supplier Development-Related Activities in the Automative Industry. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(3), 9-54. (In Persian)
56
Palomares, I., Estrella, F. J., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2014). Consensus under a fuzzy context: Taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Information Fusion, 20(1), 252–271.
57
Panahifar, F., Byrne, P. J., & Heavey, C. (2014). ISM analysis of CPFR implementation barriers. International Journal of Production Research, 52(18), 5255-5272.
58
Ramanathan, U. (2012). Supply chain collaboration for improved forecast accuracy of promotional sales. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32 (6), 676–695.
59
Ramanathan, U., & Gunasekaran, A. (2014). Supply chain collaboration: Impact of success in long-term partnerships. International Journal of Production Economics, 147(PART B), 252–259.
60
Ramanathan, U., Gunasekaran, A. & Subramanian, N. (2011). Supply chain collaboration performance metrics: a conceptual framework. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(6), 856–872.
61
Ramesh, A., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2008). Modelling the enablers of supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 4(6), 617-633.
62
Ramesh, A., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2010) Modeling the barriers of supply chain collaboration. Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2), 176–193.
63
Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmeron, J. L. (2007a). Modelling IT projects success: Emerging methodologies reviewed. Technovation, 27(10), 582–594.
64
Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., & Salmeron, J. L. (2007b). Modelling IT projects success with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 543–559.
65
Rollins, M., Pekkarinen, S., & Mehtälä, M. (2011). Inter-firm customer knowledge sharing in logistics services: an empirical study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(10), 956-971.
66
Saccani, N., & Perona, M. (2007). Shaping buyer–supplier relationships in manufacturing contexts: Design and test of a contingency model. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(1), 26-41.
67
Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2016). Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1934-1947.
68
Shateri, H., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Mokhtarzade, N. (2019). A Comparison of the Buyback, Rebate and Quantity Flexible Contracts in Multi Echelons Supply Chains with Probabilistic Demand and Game Theory Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(2), 131-151. (In Persian)
69
Sheu, C., Yen, H. R., & Chae, B. (2006). Determinants of supplier-retailer collaboration: evidence from an international study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1), 24–49.
70
Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The collaborative supply chain. The international journal of logistics management, 13(1), 15-30.
71
Simatupang, T. M., & Sridharan, R. (2005). An integrative framework for supply chain collaboration. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 16(2), 257–274.
72
Singh, P. J., & Power, D. (2009). The nature and effectiveness of collaboration between firms, their customers and suppliers: a supply chain perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 189–200.
73
Skjoett‐Larsen, T., Thernøe, C., & Andresen, C. (2003), Supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(6), 531–549.
74
Småros, J. (2007). Forecasting collaboration in the European grocery sector: Observations from a case study. Journal of Operations Management, 25(3), 702-716.
75
Soosay, C. A., Hyland, P. W., & Ferrer, M. (2008). Supply chain collaboration: Capabilities for continuous innovation. Supply Chain Management, 13(2), 160–169.
76
Spina, G., Caniato, F., Luzzini, D., & Ronchi, S. (2013). Past, present and future trends of purchasing and supply management: An extensive literature review. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1202-1212.
77
Tan, E. N., Smith, G., & Saad, M. (2006). Managing the global supply chain: a SME perspective. Production planning & control, 17(3), 238-246.
78
Thomé, A. M. T., Hollmann, R. L., & do Carmo, L. S. (2014). Research synthesis in collaborative planning forecast and replenishment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6), 949–965.
79
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015). Love me, love me not: A nuanced view on collaboration in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(3), 178-191.
80
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222.
81
Tsanos, C. S., & Zografos, K. G. (2016). The effects of behavioural supply chain relationship antecedents on integration and performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 21(6), 678–693.
82
Tsanos, C. S., Zografos, K. G., & Harrison, A. (2014). Developing a conceptual model for examining the supply chain relationships between behavioural antecedents of collaboration, integration and performance. International Journal of Logistics Management, 25(3), 418–462.
83
Wang, W., Yuan, Y., Archer, N., & Guan, J. (2005). Critical factors for CPFR success in the Chinese retail industry. Journal of Internet commerce, 4(3), 23-39.
84
Whipple, J. M., Lynch, D. F., & Nyaga, G. N. (2010). A buyer's perspective on collaborative versus transactional relationships. Industrial marketing management, 39(3), 507-518.
85
Wilson, D. T. (1995). An integrated model of buyer-seller relationships. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 23(4), 335-345.
86
Xu, J., & Wu, Z. (2011). A discrete consensus support model for multiple attribute group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(8), 1196-1202.
87
Yadav, D. K., & Barve, A. (2015). Analysis of critical success factors of humanitarian supply chain: An application of Interpretive Structural Modeling. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 213–225.
88
Yaman, D., & Polat, S. (2009). A fuzzy cognitive map approach for effect-based operations: An illustrative case. Information Sciences, 179(4), 382–403.
89
Zacharia, Z. G., Nix, N. W., & Lusch, R. F. (2009). An analysis of supply chain collaborations and their effect on performance outcomes. Journal of business logistics, 30(2), 101-123.
90
Zacharia, Z. G., Nix, N. W., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). Capabilities that enhance outcomes of an episodic supply chain collaboration. Journal of operations Management, 29(6), 591-603.
91
Zare Mehrjerdi, Y., (2002). The collaborative supply chain. Assembly Automation, 29(2), 127–136.
92
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Enhancing Diffusion of Innovation through Operational Analysis of Agent-Based Modelling
The purpose of this study is to introduce a method to improve innovation diffusion by using agent-based modeling. In this regard, an operational analysis to create agent-based modeling is investigated. agent-based model of this research is carried out in combination with the bass model. in this model, inputs include advertising effects and word-of-mouth effects estimated using the bass diffusion model. output of the model is also the total number of innovation adopters at each time step in the potential market that has been validated after the model has been correspond to real data (diffusion of television in Iran). to be more correspondent to real-world, the agent-based model is developed by preferential attachment-based network. after creating the model, the validation and verification were carried out by experiments and the operational analysis of the agent-based modeling. after model validation, we examine our method (using artificial innovators) for improving the diffusion of innovation. after validating the model, the proposed method for improving innovation diffusion through ten scenarios is investigated. in addition, a proposed criterion for analyzing the output of the innovation diffusion is presented, which is used to analyze the outputs. after the analysis, the method of artificial innovators was effective.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87488_ace3deb5726afc8988da91dda8627dbb.pdf
2020-03-20
117
142
10.52547/jimp.10.1.117
Operational Analysis
Agent-Based Modeling
Diffusion of Innovation Marketing
Bass Model
Artificial Innovators
Ehsan
Abolfathi
ehsan.abolfathi84@gmail.com
1
Ph.D Student, Department of industrial management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran.
AUTHOR
Abbas
Toloie Eshlaghy
ab.toloie@gmail.com
2
Professor, Department of industrial management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Mohammad Reza
Hamidi Zadeh
ab.hamidizadeh@gmail.com
3
Professor, Shahid Beheshti university.
AUTHOR
1.Abdul Majid, M. & Herawan, T. (2013). Modelling Reactive and Proactive Behaviour in Simulation: A Case Study in a University Organisation. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 8(6), 329-338.
1
2.Abolfathi, E., Toloie, A., & Hamidizadeh, M. (2017). An operating anatomy for agent-based modeling stand on the categorization of research done in the humanities: the diffusion of innovation in Iran. Modern researches in decision making, 3(2), 1-25.
2
3.Abolfathi, E., Toloie, A., & Hamidizadeh, M. (2017). Providing marketing agent-based model to adopt innovation in world-class. PhD thesis, Department of industrial management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3
4.Afshar, K.M., Abolfathi, E., Rajab Poor, M. (2017). A New strategy in dynamic systems applying matlab. Dafoos aja Publications.
4
5.Alam Tabriz, A., Hamidi Zadeh, M. R. & others (2017). New Product Development Model in the Iran Automotive Industry. Industrial Management Perspective, 7(2), 33–51.
5
6.Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 84, 406–411.
6
7.Baptista, M., Martinho, C., Lima, F., Santos, P., Prendinger, H. (2014). An agent-based model of consumer behavior based on the BDI architecture and neoclassical theory. Conference: Association for Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 170-178.
7
8.Barabási, A., Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.
8
9.Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 36(9), 1057–1079.
9
10.Batty, M. (2005). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models and fractals. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
10
11.Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. PNAS Colloquium, 99(3), 7280–7287.
11
12.Brown, D. G., Riolo, R., Robinson, D. T., North, M., & Rand, W. (2005). Spatial process and data models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7(1), 25–47. Special Issue on Space–Time Information Systems.
12
13.Cavoski, S., Markovic A. (2016). Analysis of Customer Behaviour and Online Retailers Strategies Using the Agent-Based Simulation. Journal for theory and practice Management, 77, 13-24.
13
14.Delre, S., Jager, W., Bijmolt, T., Janssen, M. (2010). Will It Spread or Not? The Effects of Social Influences and Network Topology on Innovation Diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 267–282.
14
15.Dignum, V. Gilbert, N. Wellman. M. (2016) Introduction to the special issue on autonomous agents for agent-based modeling. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. 30(6), 1021–1022.
15
16.Dilaver, O. & Gilbert, N. (2017). research gate , Discover scientific knowledge, and make your research visible Retrieved may 7, 2017, from researchgate, website:https://www.researchgate.net/project/Agent-based-Macroeconomic-Models-An-Anatomical-Review.
16
17.Dodson, J.A.; & Muller, E. (1978) Models of new product diffusion through advertising and word-of-mouth. Managment. Science. 24, 1568–1578.
17
18.Ducasse, P., Harsaae J., Pralle, H., Tsusaka, M., Tzur, T. (2007). Go-to-Market Advantage: The New Battlefield for Consumer Companies. Boston Consulting Group.
18
19.Eppstein, M., Grover, D., Marshal, J., Rizzo, D. (2011). An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 39(6), 3789– 3802.
19
20.Fourt, L. A., Joseph W. W. (1960). Early prediction of market success of new grocery products. Journal of Marketing, 25(2), 31–38.
20
21.Garcia, R. Rummel, P. & Hauser, J. (2007). Validating Agent-based Marketing Models Using Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 60(8), 848-857.
21
22.Garcia, R. & Jager, W. (2011). From the Special Issue Editors: Agent-Based Modeling of Innovation Diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 148–151.
22
23.Ghajavand, H., Zandieh, M., Dorry N.B. (2011) Application of meta-heuristic algorithms to the logistic integration network distribution model. Industrial Management Perspective, 1(3), 99–119.
23
24.Gilbert, N., Jager, W., Deffuant, G., Adjali, L. (2007). Complexities in markets:Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research, 60(8), 813–815.
24
25.Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models. Sage Publications.
25
26.Goldenberg, J., Libai, B., & Muller, E. (2010). The chilling effect of network externalities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(1), 4–15.
26
27.Gordon, R. (2011) Critical social marketing: definition, application and domain. Journal of Social Marketing, 1(2), 82-99.
27
28.Helda, P., Wilkinsonb, F., Marks, R., Young, L. (2014). Agent-Based Modelling, a New Kind of Research. Australasian Marketing Journal, 22(1), 4-14.
28
29. Heppenstall, A., Evans, A., & Birkin, M. (2006). Using hybrid agent-based systems to model spatially-influenced retail markets. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(3), 2.
29
30.Jager, W. (2015). Introduction To Agent Based Modeling. Retrieved feb 23, 2015, from creative commons, website: creativecommons.org/license/by-sa/3.0/legalcode.
30
31.Janssen, M. & Jager, W. (2001). Fashions, habits and changing preferences: Simulation of psychological factors affecting market dynamics. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(6), 745-772.
31
32.Kangur, A., Jager, W., Verbrugge, R., Bockarjova, M. (2017). An agent-based model for diffusion of electric vehicles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 166-182.
32
33.Kim, D.H., Y.G. Shin, S.S. Park & D.S. Jang, (2009). Forecasting diffusion of technology by using bass model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, Sept. 25-30, Hersonissos, Crete, 149-152.
33
34.Linton, J.D. (2002). Forecasting the market diffusion of disruptive and discontinuous innovation. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Trans. Eng. Manag, 49, 365–374.
34
35.Mall, A., Michael D. C., Spivey, L., Tratz, A., Waltermann, B., Walters, J. (2013). Playing to Win in Emerging Markets. Boston Consulting Group.
35
36.North, M. J., & Macal, C. M. (2007). Managing business complexity: Discovering strategic solutions with agent-based modeling and simulation. Oxford University Press.
36
37.Oakland, J.S. (1999). Total Organizational Excellence: Achieving World-Class Performance. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
37
38.Rabieh, M., Salari, H. & others (2017). Causal Loop Model for Problem of Traffic Accident: The System Dynamics Approach. Industrial Management Perspective, 7(1), 115–143.
38
39.Rand, W. (2006). Machine learning meets agent-based modeling: When not to go to a bar. Agent 2006, Chicago, IL, USA.
39
40.Rand, W. T.Rust, R. (2011) Agent-based modeling in marketing: Guidelines for rigor. Intern. J. of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 167-280.
40
41.Rangoni, R. & Jager, W. (2017). Social Dynamics of Littering and Adaptive Cleaning Strategies Explored Using Agent-Based Modelling. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(2).
41
42.Rauh, J., Schenk T., Schrodl, D. (2011). The simulated consumer – An agent-based approach to shopping behavior. Erdkunde, 66(1), 13–25.
42
43.Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster.
43
44.Rook, L. (2006). An Economic Psychological Approach to Herd Behavior. Journal of Economic, 40 (1), 75–95.
44
45.Serrano, E. Iglesias, C. Garijo, M. (2015) “A Novel Agent-Based Rumor Spreading Model in Twitter. '15 Companion Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 811-814.
45
46.Tidd, J., Bessant, J. (2009). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change. Wiley Publications.
46
47.Vattam, S. Goel, K. & Rugaber, S. (2011). Behavior Patterns: Bridging Conceptual Models and Agent-Based Simulations in Interactive Learning Environments. 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 139-143.
47
48.Wellman, P. (2014). Putting the Agent in Agent-Based Modeling. 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi agent Systems.
48
49.Wurzer, G. (2011). An Introduction to NetLogo, Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved june 5, 2017, from netlogo training website: www.iemar.tuwien.ac.at
49
50.Zhang, T. Gensler, S. & Garcia, R. (2011). A Study of the Diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(2), 152-168.
50
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Using the Multi-Stage of Integrating Approaches Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC) for Enhanced Performance Assessment
The present study aims to provide a framework for evaluating the performance of the organization using two prominent methods of data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard, so that the organization can implement the process of performance evaluation with comprehensive and comprehensive metrics that translate strategies and long-term objectives of the organization. In this research, the efficiency of 20 branches of Sina Bank using indicators that were selected according to the strategies and long-term objectives of the organization in four stages using the DEA model in each of the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard based on the cause and effect relationships of the four perspectives was calculated. Then, the efficiency of the branches is calculated without considering the cause and effect relationships of the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard and the dynamics of the internal organization processes. After determining the efficiency of the branches, for inefficient branches in each of the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard, the benchmarks were introduced from efficient branches and performance improvement solutions were presented for inefficient branches.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87489_6f51eaa7fed4b53e89ea0b7b6f83551a.pdf
2020-03-20
143
165
10.52547/jimp.10.1.143
Data Envelopment Analysis
Performance Assessment
Key Performance Indicators
Critical Success Factors
Balanced Scorecard
Mohamad Reza
Mehregan
mehregan@ut.ac.ir
1
Professor, Tehran University.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Zeinab
Moradi
zmoradi13@yahoo.com
2
M.A., Tehran University.
AUTHOR
Amado, A.F., P. Santos Sergio, M. & Marques, P. (2012). Integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Balanced Scorecard Approaches for enhanced performance assessment, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 40, 390-403.
1
Asadpour, E., Pouya, A., & Motahari Farimani, N. (2018). Designing a Balanced Scorecard Dynamic Model for Evaluating Bank Branch Performance. Industrial ManagementPerspective, 7(4), 163-197 (in Persian)
2
Asosheh, A., Nalchigar, S., & Jamporazmey, M., (2010). Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach, International Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5931-5938
3
Azar, A., Zarei Mahmood Abadi, M., & Anvari Rostami A. (2011). Balanced Performance Evaluation with Emphasis on BSC Indicators (Case Study: Yazd Province Ceramic Tile Companies), Research in its Operations and Applications, 9(1), 63-79. (In persian)
4
Banker R.D., Chang H., Janakiraman SN., & Konstans C. (2004). A Balanced Scorecard analysis of performance metrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 423–436
5
Basso, A., Casarin, F., & Funari, S. (2018). How well is the museum performing? A joint use of DEA and BSC to measure the performance of museums, Omega International Journal of Management Science, 81, 67-84
6
Chen, T. Y., & Chen, L. H. (2007). DEA performance evaluation based on BSC indicators incorporated: The case of semiconductor industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(4), 335-357.
7
Chiang, C-Y., & Lin, B. (2009). An integration of Balanced Scorecards and data envelopment analysis for firm’s benchmarking management. International Journal of Total Quality Management, 20(11), 1153–1172.
8
Ebnerasoul, S.A., Yavarian, H., & Amir Azodi, M. (2009). Performance Evaluation of Organizations: An Integrated Data Envelopment Analysis and Balanced Scorecard Approach. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 42-48.
9
Eilat H., Golany B., &Shtub A. (2006). Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: A DEA based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 172(3), 1018–1039.
10
Garcia-Valderrama, T., Muleno-Mendigirri, E., & Revuelta-Bordoy, D. (2009). Relating the perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard for R&D by means of DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 1177–1189.
11
) Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2017). Implementation Achievement: Linking strategy to operations to achieve competitive advantage along with exploring the evolution of the Balanced Scorecard (translated by Atefi, M.A.). Tehran: - Lean band. (In persian)
12
Kaplan R. S., & Norton D. P. (2001). The strategy – focus organization: how balanced Scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment, Boston. MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13
Macedo MA, Barbosa AC,Cavalcante GT(2009). Performance of bank branches in Brazil: applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) to indicators related to the BSC perspectives, E&G Revista Economia e Gestao, 19(19), 65–84.
14
Mehregan, M. R. (2013). Quantitative models in evaluating the performance of organizations (Data Envelopment Analysis). (second edition). Tehran: University Book Publishing. (In persian)
15
Momeni, M., Khodaei, S., & Bashiri, M. (2009). Evaluating Social Security Organization Performance Using the Combined Model of BSC and FDEA. Industrial Management, 1(3), 137-152. (In Persian)
16
Momeni, M. (2017). New Topics in Operations Research (Eighth Edition). Tehran: Mansour Momeni. (In Persian).
17
Najafi, S.E., Aryanjad, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. (2009). Performance Evaluation by Integrating Two Measurement Systems DEA and BSC. Management Quarterly, 5(11), 1-9. (In Persian)
18
Rafizadeh Baqarabad, A., Effati Dariani, M., & Ronagh, M. (2010). Performance Management with a Look at the Performance Evaluation of Executive Devices (2010), Tehran: Farmanesh. (In Persian)
19
Safari, H., Ghasemi, A.R., Einian, M., & Manouchehri, M. (2012). A Comprehensive Look at Performance Measurement Systems (First Edition). Tehran: Mehraban Book Institute. (In Persian)
20
Shafiee, M., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Saleh, H. (2015). Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach, International Journal of Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, 5092-5112.
21
Soleymani Damaneh, R., Momeni, M., Mostafaei A., & Rostami M. (2017). Development of a dynamic network data envelopment analysis model for evaluating banks' performance. Industrial Management perspective, 7(1), 67-89 (In Persian)
22
Tavakoli Golpayegani, M., Alam Tabriz A., Amiri M., & Motemeni A. (2015). Designing and Explaining Performance Evaluation Model with Integrated Data Envelopment Analysis, Factor Analysis and Weights. Industrial Management Perspective, 5(1), 76-44 (In Persian)
23
Yousefinejad Atari, M., & Neyshabouri, E. (2008). Evaluating R&D Projects Using Integrated Data Envelopment Analysis and Balanced Scorecard. Proceedings of the 6th International Management Conference. (In persian)
24
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
Proposing a Two-Step Method for Creating and Updating the Master Surgical Scheduling Program
In this paper the integrated Master Surgical Scheduling program and Case Mix Planning is investigated. A new two-step approach is proposed for creating and updating this program. In the first step, a model is proposed for creating master surgical schedule considering the demand distributions of different surgery kind of each surgeon. In the second step, having the weekly waiting list of patients, a model is proposed for updating this program in order to cope with demand fluctuations and maximize the use of operating rooms capacity in weekly period. In this paper the limitation of down-stream resources is also considered. Three objectives are considered for this problem: minimizing over time cost and idle time cost of operating rooms, maximizing the surgeons’ preferences and minimizing the not fulfilled demand. The real data from Al-Zahra hospital of Isfahan, Iran is used to evaluate the models and analyze the results. The proposed approach is evaluated using these real data in several problem instances. The experiments show that the proposed approach leads to better results than real program of hospital with significant different which displays the efficiency of the proposed approach.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87491_531fcadd6aae941fea025c9187786950.pdf
2020-03-20
167
196
10.52547/jimp.10.1.167
Operating Room Scheduling
Master Surgical Schedule
Case Mix Planning
Mathematical Model
Mixed Integer Programming
Shayan
Barafkandeh
sh.barafkandeh@eng.ui.ac.ir
1
M.Sc., University of Isfahan.
AUTHOR
Arezoo
Atighehchian
a.atighehchian@gmail.com
2
Assistant Professor, University of Isfahan.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Kamran
Kianfar
k.kianfar@eng.ui.ac.ir
3
Assistant Professor, University of Isfahan.
AUTHOR
Aringhieri, R., Landa, P., Soriano, P., Tànfani, E. & Testi, A. (2015). A two level metaheuristic for the operating room scheduling and assignment problem. Computers & Operations Research, 54, 21–34.
1
Astaraky, D. & Patrick, J. (2015). A simulation based approximate dynamic programming approach to multi-class,multi-resource surgical scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 245, 309–319.
2
Banditori, C., Cappanera, P. & Visintin, F. (2013). A combined optimization–simulation approach to the master surgical scheduling problem. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 24, 155–187.
3
Belien, J. & Demeulemeester, E. (2007). Building cyclic master surgery schedules with leveled resulting bed occupancy. European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1185–1204.
4
Blake, J. T., Dexter, F. & DonaLD, J. (2002). Operating Room Managers’ Use of Integer Programming for Assigning Block Time to Surgical Groups: A Case Study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 94, 143-148.
5
Cappanera, P., Visintin, F. & Banditori, C. (2016). A Goal-Programming Approach to the Master Surgical Scheduling Problem. Health Care Systems Engineering for Scientists and Practitioners, 155-166.
6
Choi, S. & Wilhelm, W. E. (2014). An approach to optimize block surgical schedules. European Journal of Operational Research, 235, 138–148.
7
Dellaert, N. & JeuneT, J. (2017). A variable neighborhood search algorithm for the surgery tactical planning problem. Computers & Operations Research, 85, 216-225.
8
Fatahi, P., Mohammadi, E. & Daneshamooz, F. (2019). Providing a Harmony Search Algorithm for Solving Multi Objective Job Shop Scheduling Problem with Considering an Assembly Stage and Lot Streaming. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 33, 61-86 (In Persian).
9
Feugener, A. (2015). An Integrated Strategic and Tactical Master Surgery Scheduling Approach With Stochastic Resource Demand. Journal of Business Logistics, 36, 374–387.
10
Fügener, A., Hans, E. W., Kolisch, R., Kortbeek, N. & Vanberkel, P. T. (2014). Master surgery scheduling with consideration of multiple downstream units. European journal of operational research, 239, 227-236.
11
Geranmayeh, S. (2015). Optimizing Surgical Scheduling through integer programming and robust optimization. telfer school of management ,university of Ottawa.
12
Gunawan, A. & Lau, H. C. (2013). Master physician scheduling problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64, 410-425.
13
Imani Imanlou, M., Atighehchian, A. (2017). Daily operating rooms scheduling under uncertainty using Simulation based optimization approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 26, 53-82 (In Persian).
14
LOUISE ROWSE, E. (2015). Robust Optimisation of Operating Theatre Schedules. School of Mathematics Cardiff University.
15
Mannino, C., Nilssen, E. J. & Nordlander, T. E. (2012). A pattern based, robust approach to cyclic master surgery scheduling. Journal of Scheduling, 15, 553–563.
16
Oostrum, J. M. V., Houdenhoven, M. V., Hurink, J. L., Hans, E. W., Wullink, G. & Kazemier, G. (2008). A master surgical scheduling approach for cyclic scheduling in operating room departments. OR Spectrum, 30, 355–374.
17
Sajadi, S.M., Ayoogh, A. & Seyed Esfahani, M.M. (2016). Proposing an integrated model for analyzing and improving scheduling problems and sending automated guided vehicles in a flexible manufacturing system. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 21, 97-127 (In Persian).
18
Tanfani, E. & Testi, A. (2010). A pre-assignment heuristic algorithm for the Master Surgical Schedule Problem (MSSP). Annals of Operations Research, 178, 105–119.
19
Testi, A., Tanfani, E. & Torre, G. (2007). A three-phase approach for operating theatre schedules. Health Care Manage Sci, 10, 163–172.
20
Vijayakumar B, Parikh PJ. & Scott R et al (2013). A dual bin-packing approach to scheduling surgical cases at a publicly-funded hospital. Eur J Oper Res, 224, 583–591.
21