ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
شناسایی و رتبهبندی استراتژیهای مناسب تابآوری زنجیره تأمین؛ رویکردی ترکیبی از نظریه بازی و روشهای تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره فازی
تأثیرات مخرب بحرانها بر عملکرد زنجیره تأمین شرکتها، متخصصان سازمانی را بر آن داشته تا بیشازپیش به مطالعه درباره مفهوم ریسک در زنجیره تأمین و چگونگی راههای مقابله با آن ترغیب شوند. از جدیدترین مفاهیم در این رابطه در حوزه زنجیره تأمین، بحث تابآوری و چگونگی اجرای استراتژیهای آن است. با توجه به اهمیت این موضوع، این پژوهش درصدد است تا بر اساس جدیدترین مطالعات در زمینه تابآوری در زنجیره تأمین، استراتژیهای مناسب را برای اجرا در یک شرکت تولیدی با مشارکت متخصصان سازمانی، شناسایی کند. در این راستا از یک رویکرد ترکیبی نوآورانه از مدل نظریه بازیها و فنون تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره در محیط فازی بهره گرفته شد. بدین منظور برای یافتن بهترین ترکیب استراتژی از میان استراتژیهای تعادل نش یکسان (تعادل نش چندگانه)، با شناسایی معیارهای مناسب، بهترتیب برای تعیین درجه اهمیت معیارها و انتخاب بهترین استراتژی تابآوری از روش فرآیند تحلیل سلسلهمراتبی فازی (FAHP) و ویکور فازی (FVIKOR) استفاده شد. در این راستا نتایج نشان داد از دیدگاه متخصصان سازمانی برای انتخاب بهترین استراتژی، معیار هزینه اجرای استراتژی دارای بالاترین درجه اهمیت است؛ همچنین از میان سه ترکیب استراتژی تعادلی بهدستآمده، استراتژیهای افزایش رویتپذیری و افزایش سرعت بازیابی بهعنوان بهترین ترکیب استراتژی برای افزایش تابآوری زنجیره تأمین برگزیده شدند.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87402_620087e52cb95a00dfc3ba519f243d2f.pdf
2019-08-23
9
31
10.52547/jimp.9.2.9
ریسک در زنجیره تأمین
تابآوری
نظریه بازی
تعادل نش چندگانه
تصمیمگیری چندمعیاره
احمد
جعفرنژاد چقوشی
1
استاد، دانشگاه تهران.
AUTHOR
ندا
رجبانی
neda_rajabani@ut.ac.ir
2
دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه تهران.
LEAD_AUTHOR
صابر
خلیلی اسبوئی
3
دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه تهران.
AUTHOR
نرگس
حکیمی
4
دانشجوی دکتری، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
AUTHOR
1. Aliprantis, C. D., & Chakrabarti, S. K. (2000). Games and decision making. Oxford University Press New York.
1
2. Aplak, H. S., & Sogut, M. Z. (2013). Game theory approach in decisional process of energy management for industrial sector. Energy Conversion and Management, 74, 70–80.
2
3. Azam, N., Zhang, Y., & Yao, J. (2017). Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets. European Journal of Operational Research. 261(2), 704-714.
3
4. Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V., & Grilo, F. (2010). The Influence of Agile and Resilient Practices on Supply Chain Performance: An Innovative Conceptual Model Proposal. In Hamburg International Conference of Logistics. 273–81.
4
5. Azevedo, S. G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-machado, V. (2012). Ecosilient Index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.01
5
6. Banerjee, N., Biswas, S., & Chintada, S. K. (2006). A game-theoretic analysis of converged cellular-voip services. In Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. 3rd IEEE (Vol. 2, pp. 715–719). IEEE.
6
7. Behzadi, G., O'Sullivan, M. J., Olsen, T., L., Scrimgeour, F., & Zhang, A. )2018(. Robust and Resilient Strategies for Managing Supply Disruptions in an Agribusiness Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 207–20.
7
8. Brandon‐Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C. W., & Petersen, K. J. (2014). A Contingent Resource‐Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50 (3), 55–73.
8
9. Burguillo, J. C. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers & Education, 55(2), 566–575.
9
10. Carvalho, H., Barroso, A. P., Machado, V. H., Azevedo, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). Supply chain redesign for resilience using simulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(1), 329–341.
10
11. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14.
11
12. Davis, M. D. (1983). Game theory: a nontechnical introduction. Courier Corporation.
12
13. Fiestras-Janeiro, M. G., García-Jurado, I., Meca, A., & Mosquera, M. A. (2011). Cooperative game theory and inventory management. European Journal of Operational Research, 210(3), 459–466.
13
14. Gibbons, R. (1992). A primer in game theory. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
14
15. Glassop, L. (2007). The three R’s of resilience: Redundancy, requisite variety and resources. In International workshop on complexity and organizational resilience; Building and sustaining resilience in complex organizations (pp. 19–34). ISCE Pub. , Mansfield, MA: ISCE Pub.
15
16. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Maknoon, R., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Multiple nash equilibriums and evaluation of strategies. New application of MCDM methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2014.967715
16
17. Ja'farnejad, A., Hashemi Petroodi, S. H. and Talayi, H. (2014). New Approaches to Supply Chain Management: Resilience, Humanitarian, Service and Sustainable Supply Chain (with various examples). Tehran: Naghsh Danesh Publications (in Persian).
17
18. Jahani, M., Moghbel Ba Erz, A. & Azar, A. (2017). Designing Supply Chain Resilience Modeling Using Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Industrial management Perspective, 25, 63-94. (In Persian).
18
19. Kamalahmadi, M., Mellat-Parast, M. (2017). Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1088971
19
20. Kapliński, O., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2010). Game theory applications in construction engineering and management. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,16 (2), 348–363.
20
21. Law, W.-W., & Pan, S.-Y. (2009). Game theory and educational policy: Private education legislation in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 227–240.
21
22. Li, R., Ma, H., Wang, F., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, Z. (2013). Game optimization theory and application in distribution system expansion planning, including distributed generation. Energies, 6(2), 1101–1124.
22
23. Liou, J. J. H., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2012). Comments on “Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(4), 672–695.
23
24. Madani, K. (2010). Game theory and water resources. Journal of Hydrology, 381(3), 225–238.
24
25. Meszek, W. (2001). Estimation of land plots using game theory. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 7(2), 62–68.
25
26. Meszek, W. (2004). Usage theory of the plays for the plot value inquiry. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 10(1), 40–46.
26
27. Meszek, W. (2007). Uncertainty phenomenon in property valuation. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(5–6), 575–585.
27
28. Meszek, W. (2013). Property valuation under uncertainty. Simulation vs strategic model. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 17(1), 79–92.
28
29. Moretti, S., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2010). An overview of recent applications of Game Theory to bioinformatics. Information Sciences, 180(22), 4312–4322.
29
30. Mulliner, E., Smallbone, K., & Maliene, V. (2013). An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method. Omega, 41(2), 270–279.
30
31. Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 36(1), 48–49.
31
32. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., & Vazirani, V. V. (2007). Algorithmic game theory (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
32
33. Nishiguchi, T., & Beaudet, A. (1998). The Toyota group and the Aisin fire. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 49.
33
34. Peldschus, F. (2007). The effectiveness of assessments in multiple criteria decisions. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 8(5–6), 519–526.
34
35. Peldschus, F. (2008). Experience of the game theory application in construction management. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 531–545.
35
36. Ponis, S. T., & Koronis, E. (2012). Supply chain resilience: definition of concept and its formative elements. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 28(5), 921–930.
36
37. Ponomarov, S. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience: a dynamic capabilities perspective.
37
38. Postorino, M. N., & Praticò, F. G. (2012). An application of the Multi-Criteria Decision‐Making analysis to a regional multi-airport system. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 4, 44–52.
38
39. Ra'ufinia, M., Baradaran, V. & Shahrjerdi, R. (2018).Developing a dynamic game theory model to analyze competition in the structure of multilateral monopolies. Industrial management Perspective, 31, 63-94. (In Persian).
39
40. Ravanestan, K., Aghajani, H., Safaei GH. A. & Yahyazadeh, M. (2017). Determining and Weighting Resilience Strategies in Iran's Supply Chain. Industrial management Perspective, 25, 145-172. (In Persian).
40
41. Rêgo, L. C., & Halpern, J. Y. (2012). Generalized solution concepts in games with possibly unaware players. International Journal of Game Theory, 41(1), 131–155.
41
42. Reneke, J. A. (2009). A game theory formulation of decision making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 71(12), 1239–1246.
42
43. Rezapour, S., Zanjirani Farahani, R., & Pourakbar, M. )2017(. Resilient Supply Chain Network Design under Competition: A Case Study. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(3). 1017–35.
43
44. Safaei Ghadikolaei, A., Khalili Esbouei, S., & Antucheviciene, J. (2014). Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.913274
44
45. Scholten, K., Sharkey Scott, P., & Fynes, B. (2014). Mitigation processes–antecedents for building supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 211–228.
45
46. Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J., & Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International Journal of Production Research, 53 (18), 5592-5623.
46
47. Vreeker, R., Nijkamp, P., & Ter Welle, C. (2002). A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(1), 27–47.
47
48. Zagorskas, J., & Turskis, Z. (2006). Multi‐attribute model for estimation of retail centres influence on the city structure. Kaunas city case study. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 12(4), 347–352.
48
49. Zopounidis, C. (1999). Multicriteria decision aid in financial management. European Journal of Operational Research, 119(2), 404–415.
49
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
رتبهبندی عوامل بنیادی با استفاده از ارزیابی نسبت تجمعی (ARAS) و مطلوبیت تصادفی سرمایهگذاران: شواهدی از بورس اوراق بهادار تهران
با توجه به تنوع عوامل تاثیرگذار بر تصمیمگیریهای مالی و ذهنی بودن ماهیت اغلب تصمیمگیریها تنها بخشی از ویژگیهای آنها با تصمیمگیریهای چندمعیاره مرتبط است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف رتبهبندی و بررسی مطلوبیت شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران مبنی بر شاخصهای بنیادی در بازه زمانی سالهای 90 تا 96 انجام شده است. در این راستا ابتدا پس از تعیین اوزان شاخصهای مورد استفاده بر اساس نظر خبرگان و بهرهگیری از روش ارزیابی نسبت تجمعی (ARAS) شرکتهای مورد نظر رتبهبندی و سپس مطلوبیت آنها بر مبنای روش رجحان تصادفی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. یافتههای پژوهش نشان میدهد که باتوجه به تداخل تابع توزیع تجمعی بازده فعلی و آتی پرتفوی با رتبه بالا و رتبه پایین نمیتوان رجحان تصادفی مرتبه اول را تشخیص داد، اما نتایج آزمون دیویدسون برای رجحان تصادفی مراتب دوم و سوم نشان دهنده غلبه سهام با رتبهبندی قوی در تمامی بازههای منفی تا مثبت بازده فعلی و آتی بر پرتفوی سهام با رتبه ضعیف است.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87403_cf14334dad6f086572b589e06458b6e9.pdf
2019-08-23
33
55
10.52547/jimp.9.2.33
تحلیل بنیادی
ارزیابی نسبت تجمعی
رتبهبندی
رجحان تصادفی
مطلوبیت
فاطمه
بایزیدی
1
دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود.
AUTHOR
عبدالمجید
عبدالباقی عطاآبادی
abdobaghi@shahroodut.ac.ir
2
استادیار، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود.
LEAD_AUTHOR
محمد
فتاحی
3
استادیار، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود.
AUTHOR
1. Abdolbaghi, A., Hamidizadeh, M., Badri, A., Arabmazar, M. (2013). Stochastic Dominance Based on Value Premium and investors Risk aversion Behavior at TSE. Asset Management and Financing, 1(1), 45-62 (In Persian).
1
2- Abdolbaghi, A., badri, A. (2015). Behavioral Preferences of Investors in Reaction to the Fundamental Variables Based on Sochastic Dominance. Asset Management and Financing, 3(1), 23-40 (In Persian).
2
3-Aynali, S. (2011). Financing Securities Trading. First Edition, Tehran: Negahe-Danesh (In ersian).
3
4- Baležentis, A., Štreimikienė, D. (2013). Integrated sustainability index: the case study of Lithuania, Intellectual Economics, 7(3), 289–303.
4
5- Brickley, j. (1983).shareholder wealth, information signaling and the specialy desingnted dividend : An empirical study. Journal of financial economic, 12 (2), 187-209.
5
6- Charles P. Jones. (2005).Investments Analysis and Management, Translate and Adapted by Reza tehrani and Asghar Noorbakhsh. Tehran: Negahe-Danesh (In Persian).
6
7- Dadelo, S., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E. K., and Dadeliene, R. (2012). Multiple criteria assessment of elite security personal on the basis of ARAS and expert methods, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 46(4),65–88.
7
8- Davidson, R., Duclos, J.-Y., (2000). Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica, 68, 1435–1464.
8
9- Ecer. F. (2018). An integrated Fuzzy AHP and ARAS model to evaluate mobile banking services. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 670–695. doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1255275.
9
10- Friedman, M., Savage, L.J., (1948). The utility analysis of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 279– 304.
10
11- Fong, W., Lean, H and Wong, W., (2008).Stochastic dominance and behavior towarrs risk: the market for Internet stocks. Economic Behavior & Organization. PP. 142-157.
11
12- Ghanaii, K.; Afshar, H. (2017). The Impact of Investment Strategies and Volume of Investment on Dividend Policy. Conference on Accounting and Management and Economics with a Dynamic Approach to the National Economy, (In Persian).
12
13- Ghodratian Kashan, A.; Anvary Rostamy, A.S. (2004). Designing a Comprehensive Model to Evaluate Performance and Rank of a Company. Modares, 8(20), 109-135 (In Persian)
13
14- Golriz, Rahnama, (2011). Rating of Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange Using Fundamental Analysis and Trading Schedule by Technical Analysis, Master's thesis, University of Science and Culture, Supervisor Alireza Alinejad, (In Persian).
14
15- Gonzalo, Jesus and Olmo, Jose. (2013). Conditional Stochastic Dominance Tests in Dynamic Settings, University of Southampton, < http://www.eco.uc3m.es>.
15
16- KHodamoradi, S., Bashiri, M., & Reisi, H. (2015). The Two-Stage Approach for Stock Selection and Portfolio Composition . Financial knowledge of Securities Analysis, 26(8), 31- 46 (In Persian).
16
17- Kutut, V.; Zavadskas, E. K.; Lazauskas, M. (2013). Assessment of priority options for preservation of historic city centre buildings using MCDM (ARAS), Procedia Engineering, 57: 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.083
17
18- Malek Akhlagh, E., Ramazanian, M.R., Rafiee Omam, F. (2012). Idenntifing and Categorizing Success Factors of E_Banking with Integarating Approach o Three Methods. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 2(3), 71-86(In Persian).
18
19- Mohammadi, A., khalife, M., Moeini, M. (2016). Stock Selection Using Fuzzy Demetel Technique and Markov Chain Process Predicting Stock Future, Journal of Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 7( 26).123-142(In Persian)
19
20- Nader, D., Mehr dost, K. (2016). Stock Selection Using TOPSIS and Linear Approaches (Cement Companies Listed in Tehran Stock Exchange).First National Conference on Engineering Management, (In Persian)
20
21- Norian, S.; Rajabi, M.; (2017). Experts Ranking Criteria on Stock Selection in Isfahan Stock Exchange Based on ANP Network Analysis Model. International Conference on Business Management and Accounting, (In Persian)
21
22- Rezaei Pandari, A ., Dehghan Nayeri, M.; & KHakbiz. M. (2017). Selection and Solveing it with Genetic Algorithms. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 25(7), 173-196 (In Persian)
22
23-Safaei Ghadikolaei,A., Khalili Esbouei, S., Antucheviciene J., Antucheviciene, et al., (2014). Applying fuzzy MCDM for financial performance evaluation of Iranian companies. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20, 274–291. doi:10.3846/20294913.2014.913274. (In Persian).
23
24- Sharifi Salim, A.; Motameni, A. (2012). Propounding a Model for Portfolio Selection in Stock Exchange by Using of MCDM (Case Study: 50 Better Companies). Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 2(1), 73-89. (In Persian).
24
25- Sureshkumar, K. K., & Elango, N. M. (2011). An efficient approach to forecast Indian stock market price and their performance analysis. International Journal ofComputer Application, 34(5), 44-49.
25
26- Venkatesh, C. K., & Tyagi, M. (2011). Fundamental analysis as a method of share valuation in comparison with technical analysis. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 5(3), 167-174.
26
27- Venkatesh, C. K. (2012). Fundamental analysis as a method of share valuation in comparison with technical analysis. International Journal of Applied Financial Management Perspectives, 1(1), 79-81.
27
28- Young, M. G. (2010). The complete guide to selling stocks short: Everything you need to know explained simply. Florida: Atlantic publishing group.
28
29- Zavadskas E. K.; Turskis Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 16(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.10
29
30- Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Vilutiene, T.( 2010). Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 10(3), 123–141.
30
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
بررسی نقش پارکهای علم و فناوری در عملکرد نوآورانه شرکتهای حوزه ICT
پارکهای علم و فناوری به منظور ایجاد محیطی امن و پویا برای شرکتهای حاضر در اقتصاد ملی تشکیل شده اند تا نیرویی فزاینده برای رشد و توسعه اقتصادی کشور باشند. از کارکردهای مهم و اساسی پارکهای علم و فناوری کمک به افزایش نوآوری شرکتهای مستقر و رقابتپذیری بیشتر آنها است. با توجه به سیاستگذاری دولت در توسعه پارکهای علم و فناوری، هدف از این پژوهش بررسی نقش پارکهای علم و فناوری در عملکرد نوآورانه شرکتهای حوزه فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات مستقر در آنها است. در این پژوهش از روش تلفیقی (کیفی و کمی) استفاده شده و بهمنظور تحقق این هدف، با 11 خبره مصاحبه انجام شد و به تحلیل 83 پرسشنامه بهدستآمده بهعنوان نمونه پژوهش پرداخته شده است. بررسی سؤالات پژوهش، با استفاده از روش معادلات ساختاری و تحلیل مسیر و با کمک نرمافزار SmartPLS انجام شده است. نتایج نشان میدهد که کارکردهای قانونی، شبکهسازی، پشتیبانی و سازمانی، مدیریت دانش و فرهنگی پارکهای علم و فناوری، به ترتیب بیشترین تأثیرات را در عملکرد نوآورانه شرکتهای حوزه ICT مستقر دارند.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87404_d2779f1efc5c33042552caec6dc8ab02.pdf
2019-08-23
57
79
10.52547/jimp.9.2.57
پارک علم و فناوری
عملکرد نوآورانه
سیاست علم و فناوری
فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات
سیاست دولت
توسعه نوآوری
ایران
مهسا
دره شیری
1
کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
AUTHOR
محمدصادق
خیاطیان
2
استادیار، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
AUTHOR
فرهاد
پناهیفر
f_panahifar@sbu.ac.ir
3
استادیار، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
LEAD_AUTHOR
Allahyari, R (2017). Development of a competency model for managers of science and technology parks in Iran (Doctoral dissertation). Shahid Beheshti university, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
1
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of management, 40(5), 1297-1333.
2
Appold, S. J. (2004). Research parks and the location of industrial research laboratories: an analysis of the effectiveness of a policy intervention. Research Policy, 33(2), 225-243.
3
Autant-Bernard, C., Fadairo, M., & Massard, N. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation policies within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 42(1), 196-210.
4
Díez-Vial, Isabel, and Marta Fernández-Olmos (2017) "The effect of science and technology parks on firms’ performance: how can firms benefit most under economic downturns?" Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29 (10):1153-1166.
5
Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J., & Wang, H. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications: Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
6
Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). Measuring innovation. In K. Smith (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 148-177). New York: Oxford University Press.
7
Garson, G. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression and structural equation models. Statistical Associates Blue Book Series. In: Statistical Associates Publishing: Asheboro, USA.
8
Gharib, A., Azar, A., Moghbel Ba Erz, A., Dehghan Nayeri, M. (2019). Designing Organizational Innovation Measuring Model with Dynamic Network DEA (Case Study: Iranian First Level Universities). Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 9(Issue 1, Spring 2019), 9-29.
9
Gërguri‐Rashiti, S., Ramadani, V., Abazi‐Alili, H., Dana, L. P., & Ratten, V. (2017). ICT, innovation and firm performance: The transition economies context. Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(1), 93-102.
10
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277-319): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
11
IASP. Defenitions. Retrieved from https://www.iasp.ws/Our-industry/Definitions
12
Islamic Parliament Research Center Of The Islamic Republic Of IRAN (2016). Evaluating the Position of Industrial Development Strategy in Country Development Plans and Its Prospects in Sixth Development Plan (Publication No. 14790). Retrieved from https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/962434
13
Islamic Parliament Research Center Of The Islamic Republic Of IRAN (2004). Law of the Fourth Plan of Economic, Social and Cultural Development of the Islamic Republic of Iran (Publication No. 17375). Retrieved from https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/94202
14
Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L., & Halman, J. I. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs.: An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technovation, 22(1), 1-13.
15
Koh, F. C., Koh, W. T., & Tschang, F. T. (2005). An analytical framework for science parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Journal of business venturing, 20(2), 217-239.
16
Lechman, E. (2016). ICT DIFFUSION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PU.
17
Lowry, P. B., & Gaskin, J. (2014). Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE transactions on professional communication, 57(2), 123-146.
18
Magner, N., Welker, R. B., & Campbell, T. L. (1996). Testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation processes in a latent variable structural equations framework. Accounting and Business Research, 27(1), 41-50.
19
Massey, D., & Wield, D. (2003). High-tech fantasies: Science parks in society, science and space: Routledge.
20
Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of , Islamic Republic of Iran (2003). Establishment Rules of Science and Technology Parks on 8th March 2008. Retrieved from: ytre.ir/pCV
21
Naeiji, M., Panahifar, F., Tatari, Y. (2017). The Effect of Stakeholders Participation in New Product Development on Organizational Performance. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 7(Issue 3, Autumn 2017), 27-46 (In Persian).
22
Naghizadeh, R., Elahi, Sh. & Manteghi, M. (2016). The Pattern of Technological Innovation Development in The Regions of IRAN; The Case of BIO, NANO, AERO AND ICT. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 8(1), 43-59 (In Persian).
23
Nargesi, G, R., Nargesi, S, R. & Ghafari, A. (2016). Technological Ent. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 8(4), 749-766. doi: 10.22059/jed.2016.58800 (In Persian).
24
Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic development quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.
25
Quintas, Paul, David Wield, and Doreen Massey (1992) "Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model" Technovation 12 (3):161-175.
26
Safari, R., Rajabzadeh, A., & Memarpour, M. (2014). Statistics applications with SPSS, LISREL, SmartPLS software (1st ed.). Tehran: Negah Danesh Publication (In Persian)
27
Saifoddin, A., Aslani, A., Darestani, H. F., & Mousavi, H. (2016). Regulations & conditions executive technology park city (1st ed.). Tehran: Tehran Municipality.Tehran Urban Planning and Research Center. Department of Science and Technology -- Rules and practice (In Persian).
28
Sanaeepour, H. (2008). Investigating the Relationship between Science and Technology Park Services with the Growth of New Technology-Based Companies Based in Tehran Technology Parks(Master Thesis). University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
29
Soleymani, M. (2012). Science and Technology Parks and Incubators with a Global Perspective. Journal of Science and Technology Parks and Incubators, 4(8), 2-10 (In Persian).
30
Steffen, M. O., Oliveira, M., & Balle, A. R. (2017). Knowledge sharing among companies in a science and technology park. Business Information Review, 34(2), 101-108.
31
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2009). Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change (4th ed.): John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
32
Van de Ven, A. H., Angle, H. L., & Poole, M. S. (2000). Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies: Oxford University Press on Demand.
33
Van der Vaart, T., Pieter van Donk, D., Gimenez, C., & Sierra, V. (2012). Modelling the integration-performance relationship: Collaborative practices, enablers and contextual factors. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(9), 1043-1074.
34
Vilà, P. C., & Pagès, J. L. (2008). Science and technology parks: creating new environments favourable to innovation. Paradigmes: economia productiva i coneixement.
35
Zare MirakAbad, A., Niazi, E., Salehi, S. (2012). Futures studies of Key Technologies in Iranian ICT Industry with Emphasis on Business Model Detection. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 1(Issue 4, Winter 2012), 107-130 (In Persian).
36
Zhang, H., & Sonobe, T. (2011). Development of science and technology parks in China, 1988-2008. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 5, 6.
37
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
ارزیابی مبتنی بر مدل سیاستهای کاهش وابستگی به انرژی: مدلی بر اساس رویکرد پویاییشناسی سیستم
تقاضای بالا و غیرمنطقی سوخت در ایران، مصرف بیشازاندازه و گاهی غیرعقلانی سوخت در بخشهای مختلف ازجمله حملونقل در کنار تأمین سوخت ارزانقیمت برای نیروگاههای تولید برق، عدم وجود استانداردهای صحیح در مصرف سوخت در بخشهای مختلف، وابستگی شدید تأمین انرژی به سوختهای فسیلی را برای ایران به ارمغان آورده است. افزایش هزینههای تأمین انرژی با درنظرگیری روند افزایشی تقاضای انرژی، بهویژه شدت انرژی کشور، تهدیدی جدی برای امنیت انرژی کشور به شمار می رود. ازاینرو پژوهش حاضر با هدف تحلیل ساختار سیستمی مولد مسئله وابستگی به انرژی در ایران و همچنین ارزیابی مبتنی بر مدل سیاستها و راهکارهای مطرح برای کاهش این وابستگی طراحی شده است. روش تحقیق حاضر مبتنی بر مراحل روش پویاییشناسی سیستم است. پس از ساخت مدل شبیهسازی و اعتبارسنجی آن، چهار سیاست تداوم وضع فعلی، افزایش عرضه انرژی از طریق سوختهای فسیلی، افزایش عرضه از طریق انرژیهای تجدیدپذیر و همچنین مدیریت سمت تقاضا روی مدل اجرا شد. نتایج نشان میدهد اجرای توأم سیاستهای مدیریت سمت تقاضا و توسعه ظرفیت انرژیهای تجدیدپذیر میتواند بهصورت همزمان کاهش میزان شاخص وابستگی به انرژی و همچنین افزایش شاخص امنیت انرژی را در بلندمدت به همراه داشته باشد.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87405_dc78cba900fd878b32d3f33177c1ce21.pdf
2019-08-23
81
106
10.52547/jimp.9.2.81
وابستگی انرژی
امنیت انرژی
سوخت فسیلی
انرژی تجدیدپذیر
پویاییشناسی سیستم
مهدی
باستان
mbastan@eyc.ac.ir
1
مربی، دانشگاه ایوانکی، گرمسار.
LEAD_AUTHOR
حامد
شکوری گنجوی
2
دانشیار، دانشگاه تهران.
AUTHOR
1. Ahmad, S., & bin Mat Tahar, R. (2014). Using system dynamics to evaluate renewable electricity development in Malaysia. Kybernetes, 43(1), 24-39.
1
2. Ang, B. W., Choong, W., & Ng, T. (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1077-1093.
2
3. Aslani, A., Helo, P., & Naaranoja, M. (2014). Role of renewable energy policies in energy dependency in Finland: System dynamics approach. Applied energy, 113, 758-765.
3
4. Aslani, A., & Wong, K.-F. V. (2014). Analysis of renewable energy development to power generation in the United States. Renewable Energy, 63, 153-161.
4
5. Barton, B. (2004). Energy security: managing risk in a dynamic legal and regulatory environment: Oxford University Press on Demand.
5
6. Bastan, M., Akbarpour, S., Ahmadvand, A. (2016). Business Dynamics of Iranian Commercial Banks, The 34th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Delft, the Netherlands (in Persian).
6
7. Bastan, M., Akbarpour, S., Ahmadvand, A., Shakouri G., H. (2019). Making the Profitability Paradox of Bad Banks: A System Dynamics Approach. The 3rd IEOM European Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
7
8. Bastan, M., Ramazani K., R., Delshad S., S., Ahmadvand, A. (2018). Sustainable development of agriculture: a system dynamics model. Kybernetes, 47(1), 142-162.
8
9. Banos, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F. G., Gil, C., Alcayde, A., & Gómez, J. (2011). Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 15(4), 1753-1766.
9
10. Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75, 415-421.
10
11. Ellabban, O., Abu-Rub, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2014). Renewable energy resources: Current status, future prospects and their enabling technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 748-764.
11
12. Farajzadeh, Z. (2016). Energy Intensity in the Iranian Economy: Components and Determinants. Iranian Energy Economics, 4(15), 55-98. doi: 10.22054/jiee.2016.1880 (in Persian)
12
13. Hsu, C.-W. (2012). Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs on solar PV installations. Applied energy, 100, 205-217.
13
14. Jebaselvi, G. A., & Paramasivam, S. (2013). Analysis on renewable energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 625-634.
14
15. Khoshneshin, F., Bastan, M. (2014). Analysis of dynamics of crisis management in the earthquake and performance Improvement using system dynamics methodology, The 10th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (IIEC 2014), Tehran, Iran (in Persian).
15
16. Kovačovská, L. (2007). European Union’s energy (in) security: dependence on Russia. Def Strateg, 2, 5-21.
16
17. Kruyt, B., van Vuuren, D. P., de Vries, H. J., & Groenenberg, H. (2009). Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2166-2181.
17
18. Lean, H. H., & Smyth, R. (2013). Are fluctuations in US production of renewable energy permanent or transitory? Applied energy, 101, 483-488.
18
19. Maleki, A. (2007). Energy security and lessons for Iran, Development Strategy, 4(12), 206-222 (in Persian)
19
20. Månsson, A., Johansson, B., & Nilsson, L. J. (2014). Assessing energy security: An overview of commonly used methodologies. Energy, 73, 1-14.
20
21. Mohaghar, A., Hashemi Petrodi, S., Talaei, H. (2017). Dynamic Modeling of a New Product Supply Chain using System Dynamics Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 6(4), 9-36 (in Persian).
21
22. Rabieh, M., Salari, H., Karami, M., Ziyaei, M., Yasoubi, A. (2017). Causal Loop Model for Problem of Traffic Accident: The System Dynamics Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 7(1), 115-143 (in Persian).
22
23. Radovanović, M., Filipović, S., & Pavlović, D. (2017). Energy security measurement–A sustainable approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 1020-1032.
23
24. Richter, M. (2012). Utilities’ business models for renewable energy: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2483-2493.
24
25. Ruhul, S., Rafiq, S., & Hassan, A. K. (2008). Causality and dynamics of energy consumption and output: Evidence from non-OECD Asian countries. Journal of Economic Development, 33(2), 1-26.
25
26. Soltanian Telkabadi, H., Mohaghar, A., Sadeghi Moghadam, M. (2016). Pricing-Policy Analysis of Petrochemical Feed-Stock through Dynamic Systems Approach. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 5(4), 59-78 (in Persian).
26
27. Wu, Z., & Xu, J. (2013). Predicting and optimization of energy consumption using system dynamics-fuzzy multiple objective programming in world heritage areas. Energy, 49, 19-31.
27
28. Zadfallah, E., Bastan, M., Ahmadvand, A. (2017). A Qualitative System Dynamics Approach to Clinical Risk Management, The 13th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (IIEC2017), Babolsar, Iran (in Persian).
28
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
طراحی یک مدل ترکیبی جدید مبتنی بر تحلیل پوششی دادهها، شبکه عصبی مصنوعی، الگوریتم ژنتیک و بهینهسازی انبوه ذرات برای ارزیابی کارایی و الگوسازی واحدهای کارا و ناکارا
هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر، طراحی یک مدل ترکیبی جدید مبتنی بر تحلیل پوششی دادهها، شبکه عصبی مصنوعی، الگوریتم ژنتیک و بهینهسازی انبوه ذرات برای ارزیابی کارایی و الگوسازی واحدهای کارا و ناکارا است که واحدهای تصمیمگیری در آن اندک باشد. فرایندی دومرحلهای، برای ارزیابی کارایی نسبی۱۶ شرکتهای برق منطقهای شرکت توانیر، از مدل ترکیبی تحلیل پوششی دادهها با شبکه عصبی که بهوسیله الگوریتم ژنتیک بهینه شده است، بهره برده است وبا یک الگوریتم ترکیبی انبوه ذرات با الگوریتم ژنتیک به الگوسازی برای واحدهای کارا و ناکارا پرداخته شده است. میانگین کارائی شرکتهای برق منطقهای طی سالهای ۱۳۹۱ تا ۱۳۹۶ از ۰/۸۹۳۴ به ۰/۹۱۴۷ افزایش یافته است و شرکتهای برق منطقهای آذربایجان، اصفهان، تهران، خراسان، سمنان، کرمان، گیلان و یزد، همواره دارای بیشترین میانگین کارائی، ۱ و شرکتهای برق منطقهای غرب و فارس با مقادیر میانگین کارائی ۰/۷۰۴۷ و ۰/۶۰۲۵ دارای کمترین مقدار کارائی طی سالهای ۱۳۹۱ تا ۱۳۹۶ بودهاند.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87406_1d5ffd63b4096cbf1cc7cd5c4e050cf0.pdf
2019-08-23
107
129
10.52547/jimp.9.2.107
الگوریتم بهینهسازی انبوه ذرات ژنتیک
الگوسازی
کارایی
مدل تحلیل پوششی دادهها
شبکه عصبی ژنتیکی
محمدرضا
میرزائی
1
دانشجوی دکتری، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
AUTHOR
محمدعلی
افشار کاظمی
dr.mafshar@gmail.com
2
دانشیار، واحد تهران مرکز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
LEAD_AUTHOR
عباس
طلوعی اشلقی
3
استاد، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
AUTHOR
Abd-El-Wahed, W., Mousa, A., & El-Shorbagy, M. (2011). Integrating particle swarm optimization with genetic algorithms for solving nonlinear optimization problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 235(5), 1446-1453.
1
Ajaly, Mehdi and Safari, Hossein. (2011). Performance Evaluation of Decision Making Units Using Hybrid Model of Predictive Neural Networks and Data Envelopment Analysis (Case Study: National Iranian Gas Company). Journal of Industrial Engineering, 45 (1), 13-29 (in Persian).
2
Alborzi, Mahmoud. (2014). Genetic Algorithm. Sharif University of Technology Scientific Publishing Institute: Tehran (in Persian).
3
Alborzi, Mahmoud. (2014). Neural Networks - Translated by R. Bill and T. Jackson. Sharif University of Technology Publications Institute: Tehran (in Persian).
4
Angeline, P. J. (1998). Using selection to improve particle swarm optimization. Paper presented at the Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, 1998. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., The 1998 IEEE International Conference on.
5
Athanassopoulos, A. D., & Curram, S. P. (1996). A Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks as Tools for Assessing the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(8), 1000-1016.
6
Azar, A., Daneshvar, M., Khodad Hosseini, S. H., & Azizi, Sh. (2012). Designing a Multilevel Performance Assessment Model: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Organizational Resource Management Research, Volume 2 (3), 1-22 (in Persian).
7
Bagdadioglu, N., Price, C. M. W., & Weyman-Jones, T. G. (1996). Efficiency and ownership in electricity distribution: a non-parametric model of the Turkish experience. Energy Economics, 18(1-2), 1-23.
8
Bongo, M. F., Ocampo, L. A., Magallano, Y. A. D., Manaban, G. A., & Ramos, E. K. F. (2018). Input–output performance efficiency measurement of an electricity distribution utility using super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. Soft Computing. doi:10.1007/s00500-018-3007-2
9
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
10
Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A., & Seiford, L. (1995). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications, Kluwer Publications.
11
Cook WD and Green RH. (2005). Evaluating power plant efficiency: a hierarchical model. Computers & Operations Research; 32, 813-823.
12
Costa, Á., & Markellos, R. N. (1997). Evaluating public transport efficiency with neural network models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 5(5), 301-312.
13
Cullmann, A., & von Hirschhausen, C. (2008). Efficiency analysis of East European electricity distribution in transition: legacy of the past? Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29(2), 155.
14
De Jong, K. A. (1975). Analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems.
15
Debreu, G. (1951). The Coefficient of Resource Utilization, Econometric, 19, Economics: Principles and Applications: Zaria: AGTAB Publishers Ltd.
16
Dreyfus, G. (2005). Neural networks: methodology and applications: Springer Science & Business Media.
17
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. Paper presented at the Micro Machine and Human Science, 1995. MHS'95., Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on.
18
Emrouznejad, A., & Shale, E. (2009). A combined neural network and DEA for measuring efficiency of large scale datasets. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(1), 249-254.
19
Fallahi, M., & Ahmadi, V. (2005). Cost efficiency analysis of electricity distribution companies in Iran. Journal of Economic Researches, 71, 297-320.
20
Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253-290.
21
Garg, H. (2016). A hybrid PSO-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 274, 292-305.
22
Goldberg, D. E., & Holland, J. H. (1988). Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Machine learning, 3(2), 95-99.
23
Goto, M., & Tsutsui, M. (2008). Technical efficiency and impacts of deregulation: An analysis of three functions in US electric power utilities during the period from 1992 through 2000. Energy Economics, 30(1), 15-38.
24
Hattori, T., Jamasb, T., & Pollitt, M. G. (2003). A comparison of UK and Japanese electricity distribution performance 1985-1998: lessons for incentive regulation.
25
Hess, B., & Cullmann, A. (2007). Efficiency analysis of East and West German electricity distribution companies–Do the “Ossis” really beat the “Wessis”? Utilities Policy, 15(3), 206-214.
26
Hjalmarsson, L., & Veiderpass, A. (1992). Efficiency and ownership in Swedish electricity retail distribution International Applications of Productivity and Efficiency Analysis (pp. 3-19): Springer.
27
Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with application to biology. Control and artificial intelligence.
28
Hosseini, Mirza Hassan (2012). Measuring Productivity Changes Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Index in Power Generation Management Companies .Industrial Management Perspective, 2 (6), 150-129 (in Persian).
29
Kazemi, Mostafa.,Fayezy Rad, Mohammad Ali (1979). Predicting Performance by Nonlinear Influence of Time Delay in Data Envelopment Analysis with Artificial Neural Networks. Journal of Industrial Management, 10 (1) 34-17 (in Persian).
30
Koopmans, T. C. (1951). Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 455-465.
31
Li, J., Li, J., & Zheng, F. (2014). Unified efficiency measurement of electric power supply companies in China. Sustainability, 6(2), 779-793.
32
Mehregan, Mohammad Reza. (2012). Quantitative Models in Organizational Performance Evaluation (Data Envelopment Analysis). Tehran: Tehran University School of Management Publications (in Persian).
33
Meibodi, A. E. (1998). Efficiency considerations in the electricity supply industry: The case of Iran: university of Surrey.
34
Menhaj, Mohammad Bagher. (2014). Fundamentals of Neural Networks (Computational Intelligence) Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic) (in Persian).
35
Mostafa, M. M. (2009). Modeling the efficiency of top Arab banks: A DEA–neural network approach. Expert systems with applications, 36(1), 309-320.
36
Munakata, T. (1998). Fundamentals of the new artificial intelligence (Vol. 2): Springer.
37
Russell, R. R. (1985). Measures of technical efficiency. Journal of Economic Theory, 35(1), 109-126.
38
Sadjadi, S., & Omrani, H. (2008). Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: An application for Iranian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4247-4254.
39
40. Salimi, Mehrdad. Karamati, Mohammad Ali. (2015). Evaluating and Analyzing the Technical Efficiency of Regional Electricity Companies of Iran with Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Quality and Productivity of Iranian Power Industry, Fourth Year (8), 37-48 (in Persian).
40
Samoilenko, S., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2010). Determining sources of relative inefficiency in heterogeneous samples: Methodology using Cluster Analysis, DEA and Neural Networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(2), 479-487.
41
Shokrollahpour, E., Lotfi, F. H., & Zandieh, M. (2016). An integrated data envelopment analysis–artificial neural network approach for benchmarking of bank branches. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 12(2), 137-143.
42
Soleimaniadena, R., Momeni, M., Mostafaei, A., and Rostami-M Khalifa, M. (2017). Development of a dynamic network data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the performance of banks. Industrial Management Perspectives, 25 (7), 67-89 (in Persian).
43
Toloei Eshlaghi, Abbas., Afshar Kazemi, Mohammad Ali. And Abbasi, Fatima. (2013) Evaluation of Insurance Companies' Performance Based on Integrated Balanced Scorecard Approach and Data Envelopment Analysis Technique and Providing Development Pathway for Inefficient Companies. Journal of Business Management (17), 65-82 (in Persian).
44
Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., Alborzi, M., & Ghafari, B. (2012). Assessment of the personnel’s efficiency with Neuro/DEA combined model.
45
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498-509.
46
Wu, D. D., Yang, Z., & Liang, L. (2006). Using DEA-neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian bank. Expert systems with applications, 31(1), 108-115.
47
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
مقایسه قراردادهای بازپسگیری، کاهش و منعطف در زنجیرههای تأمین چندسطحی با تقاضای احتمالی و رویکرد نظریه بازیها
شرکتها برای دستیابی به موفقیت در فضای رقابتی بازار جهانی، اشکال متنوعی از همکاریها را بهکار میبرند. مدلهای همکاری سعی در یافتن پاسخی کاربردی در ترغیب اعضای زنجیره تأمین برای اتخاذ تصمیمات بهعنوان سیستمهای متمرکز را دارند که در این خصوص قراردادهای همکاری ابزارهای مفیدی برای تغییر رفتار اعضای زنجیره به رفتار منسجم همکارانه برای دستیابی به هدف نهایی زنجیره که سودآوری کلی آن است، با یکدیگر هستند. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تعیین مناسبترین قرارداد ایجادکننده همکاری بین سطوح زنجیره، به بررسی زنجیرههای تأمین و قراردادهای همکاری پرداخته است و درنتیجه آن، یک زنجیره تأمین دوسطحی و قراردادهای بازپسگیری، کاهش و منعطف انتخاب شدند. با رویکرد نظریه بازیها، بازیهای ایستا با اطلاعات کامل و تعادل نش، بهعنوان شیوه بررسی و احتمالیبودن تقاضای مشتریان نهایی، مدلهای اولیه توابع سود هر سطح زنجیره طراحی و سپس با مدنظر قراردادن شرایط خاص هر قرارداد، مدلهای ثانویه نیز بازطراحی شدند؛ سپس با طراحی آزمایشهایی با استفاده از نرمافزار مینیتب و حل آنها توسط نرمافزارهای اکسل و لینگو و تحلیل خروجیها، قرارداد کاهش بهعنوان مناسبترین شیوه برقراری همکاری در بین سطوح زنجیره تعیین شد.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87407_1bfaa259c44d3d63ebfb10f56b77c842.pdf
2019-08-23
131
151
10.52547/jimp.9.2.131
زنجیره تأمین دوسطحی
قرارداد بازپسگیری
قرارداد کاهش
قرارداد منعطف
نظریه بازیها
حمیدرضا
شاطری
1
کارشناسی ارشد، موسسه آموزشی مهر البرز، تهران.
AUTHOR
حنان
عموزاد مهدیرجی
h.amoozad@ut.ac.ir
2
استادیار، دانشگاه تهران.
LEAD_AUTHOR
نیما
مختارزاده
mokhtarzadeh@ut.ac.ir
3
استادیار، دانشگاه تهران.
AUTHOR
1. Amoozad Mahdiraji, H. & Jaafarnejad, A. & Moddares Yazdi, M. & Mohaghar, A. (2014). Cooperation Modeling for Unlimited Three Echelon Supply Chain: Game Theory Approach. Management Researches in Iran, 18(1), 172-192. (In Persian).
1
2. Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., Jaafarnejad, A., Mohaghar, A., Modarres Yazdi, M., (2013) Deciding Between Independence and Coalition, in an Three Echelon Supply Chain. Industrial Management Perspective, 3(1), 9-34 (In Persian).
2
3. Amoozad Mahdiraji, H. & Kazimieras Zavadskas, E. & Razavi Hajiagha, S. H. (2015). Game theoretic approach for coordinating unlimited multi echelon supply chains, Transformations in Business & Economics, 14(2), 133-151.
3
4. Arshinder, K. & Arun, D. S. G. (2008). A framework for evaluation of coordination by contracts: A case of two-level supply chains, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56, 1177-1191.
4
5. Barati, M. (2013). A model for managing supply chain relations in small and medium enterprises In order to increase competitiveness, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Ph.D. in Industrial Management, Allameh Tabataba'I University, Tehran. (In Persian).
5
6. Cachon. G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts, Hand book in operation research and management science: supply chain management, 11, 229-339.
6
7. Cai, W. & Abdel-Malek, L. & Hoseini, B. & Rajaei Dehkordi, S. (2015). Impact of flexible contracts on the performance of both retailer and supplier. Int. J. Production Economics, 170, 429-444.
7
8. Chen, J. & Dada, M. & Hu (Joice), Q. (2016). Flexible procurement contracts for competing retailers. European Journal of Operational Research, 000, 1-13
8
9. Fakoor Saghih, A. (2013). A Model for Resilience of Supply Chain for Competitiveness in Iranian Automotive Companies, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Ph.D. in Industrial Management, Allameh Tabataba'I University, Tehran. (In Persian)
9
10. Fredendall, L. D. & Hill, E. (2000). Translated by: Pooya, A. Felfelani, A. Basics of Supply Chain Management. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Pub. (In Persian)
10
11. Heydari, J. & Asl-Najafi, J. (2016). Coordinating inventory decisions in a two-echelon supply chain through the target sales rebate contract. Int. J. Inventory Research, 3(1), 49-69.
11
12. Hu, B., Feng, Y., (2017), Optimization and coordination of supply chain with revenue sharing contracts and service requirement under supply and demand uncertainty, IJPE, 183, A, 158-183.
12
13. Jaafarnejad, A. & Amoozad Mahdiraji, H. (2016). Supply Chain: Design & Control. Tehran: Mehrban Nashr Pub. (In Persian).
13
14. Jilan Buroujeni, A., Amoozad Mahdiraji, H., (2015), Modeling Inventory Policies in Multi Echelon Supply Chain by Beysian Networks, Industrial Management Perspective, 4, 3, 61-84.
14
15. Jianhu, C., Xiaoking, H., Pandu, R.T., Shang, J., (2017), Flexible contract design for VMI supply chain with service-sensitive demand: Revenue-sharing and supplier subsidy, EJOR, 261, 1, 143-153.
15
16. Mohammadzadeh, N. (2014). Coordination between members of a multi-source supply chain in disruptive situations, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. (In Persian).
16
17. Naimi Sedigh, A. (2015). Coordination of pricing, production and marketing decisions in the competitive supply chain: game theory approach. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. (In Persian).
17
18. Pfeiffer, T. (2016). A comparison of simple two-part supply chain contracts, Int. J. Production Economics, 180, 114-124.
18
19. Sainathan, A., Groenevelt, H., (2019), Vendor managed inventory contracts – coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective, EJOR, 272, 1, 249-260.
19
20. Sluis, S. & De Giovanni, P. (2015). The selection of contracts in supply chains: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 41, 1-11.
20
21. Taleizadeh, A., Mohammadi, R., (2015), Optimizing the Selling Price and Advertising Cost in a Two Layers Supply ChainIncluding a Manufacturer and Two Retailers. Industrial Management Perspective, 5(2), 107-127.
21
22. Xin, F., Yuan, F., (2018), The Coordination and Preference of Supply Chain Contracts Based on Time-Sensitivity Promotional Mechanism, Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 3,3, 158-178.
22
23. Yang, H. & Zhuo, W. & Zha, Y. & Wan, H. (2016). Two-period supply chain with flexible trade credit contract. Expert Systems with Applications, 66, 95-105.
23
ORIGINAL_ARTICLE
توسعه محصـول جدید با ارزیابی و رتبـهبندی الزامـات فنـی مهندسـی بر اساس رویکـردی ترکیبی از روشهایQFD ، DEMATEL – ANP فازی و DEA
امروزه با توجه به رقابتیشدن تجارت جهانی و لزوم پاسخگویی به خواستههای مشتریان و با توجه به رشد روزافزون فناوری بهمنظور حفظ و بقای سازمان میتوان از ترکیبهای مختلف تکنیک توسعه عملکرد کیفیت (QFD) بهعنوان ابزاری قدرتمند در مهندسی کیفیت بهره برد. در این پژوهش ابتدا با استفاده از روش دلفی، مؤلفههای اصلی پژوهش شامل نیازمندیهای مشتریان و الزامات فنی مهندسی شناسایی شده و سپس بهعلت اهمیت وزندهی در ابزار توسعه عملکرد کیفیت، با توسعه روش تصمیمگیری ترکیبی DEMATEL-ANP فازی، میزان و شدت روابط اثرگذاری و اثرپذیری مؤلفهها و اوزان مربوط به آنها برای تکمیل ماتریس خانه کیفیت بهدست خواهد آمد. در ادامه بهمنظور کاملترشدن روش QFD از بسط جدید رابطه واسرمن استفاده خواهد شد. در راستای حل مشکل QFD سنتی مبنی بر درنظرنگرفتن اثر محدودیتها بر الزامات فنی مهندسی، یک رویکـرد ترکیبی از روشهای QFD ، DEMATEL-ANP فازی و تحلیل پوششی دادهها (DEA) در پژوهش حاضر بهکار خواهد رفت. بهمنظور نشاندادن اثربخشی رویکرد پژوهش، این رویکرد بهعنوان مورد مطالعه در بخش تولید ماشین لباسشویی «شرکت صنایع گلدیران» اجرا خواهد شد.
https://jimp.sbu.ac.ir/article_87408_2912445d9ff8440596fcbac81f5619f6.pdf
2019-08-23
153
179
10.52547/jimp.9.2.153
روش توسعه عملکرد کیفیت
نظریه فازی
فرآیند تحلیل شبکهای
بسط جدید رابطه واسرمن
تحلیل پوششی دادهها
حسین
حسینپور
1
کارشناسی ارشد، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
AUTHOR
مهدی
یزدانی
mehdi_yazdani2007@yahoo.com
2
استادیار، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قزوین.
LEAD_AUTHOR
1. Azadi, M., & Farzipour Sean, R. (2013). A combination of QFD and imprecise DEA with enhanced Russell graph measure: A case study in healthcare. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 47(4), 281-291.
1
2. Akbas, H., & Bilgen, B. (2017). An integrated fuzzy QFD and TOPSIS methodology for choosing the ideal gas fuel at WWTPs. Energy, 125, 484 – 497.
2
3. Askari, A., & Charkhkar, M. (2015). The determination and assessment of the relational efficiency indicators of Tehran City’s and Provinces’ tax affairs general directorates with data envelope analysis approach (DEA). Journal of Tax Research, 23(27), 36-62. (In Persian)
3
4. Berx, K., Friedl, M., Witters, M., & Hehenberger, P., (2016), A customer requirement driven framework for design synthesis - applied to a washing machine, IFAC (International Federation of Automatic Control), 49(21), 431-438.
4
5. Ertugrul, K. E., & Dursun, M. (2014). An integrated supplier selection methodology incorporating QFD and DEA with imprecise data. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 6995-7004.
5
6. Farajpour, Q., & Noursalna, R. (2011). An Integrated Framework for Formulate and Implement Strategies at the Islamic Republic of Iran Postal Company. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management, 22(1), 78-90 (In Persian)
6
7. Farsijani, H., Arman, M. H., Hosseinbeigi, A., & Jalili, A. (2011). Data Envelopment Analysis Model with Inbound-Output Approach, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 1(1), 39-56. (In Persian).
7
8. Fargnoli, M., & Haber, N. (2019). A practical ANP-QFD methodology for dealing with requirements’ inner dependency in PSS Development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 536-548.
8
9. Ho, W., He, T., Lee, C. K. M., & Emrouznejad, A. (2012). Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10841-10850.
9
10. Hojjati, S. M. H., & Zareinejad, M. (2014). Determination of technical charactristics of products and their priority based on fuzzy QFD. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management, Volume 1-30, No. 1, p. 137-150. (In Persian)
10
11. Hsu, C. H., Chang, A. Y., & Luo, W. (2017). Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs-integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161(10), 629-645.
11
12. Izadi, M., Ataeipoor, S., & Izadi, A. (2016). A novel group decision making approach to prioritize engineering characteristics in QFD process based on experts, vote. Journal of Fundamental and applied Sciences, 8(3S), 1448-1465.
12
13. Karimi, F., Namedar Zanganeh, S., & Shahriari, H. (2016). Presenting a framework for robustquality function development (QFD), under the codition of inputs being fuzzy. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management, 1(27), 51-67. (In Persian)
13
14. Khatami Firouzabadi, A., & Mazroui, E. (2011). Applying AHP to QFD to assess customer demands and rank technical and engineering requirements in Shayesteh Carpet Company. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 1(1), 95-111. (In Persian)
14
15. Liang-Hsuan, C., Wen-Chang, K., & Feng-Ting, Y. (2016). Approach based on fuzzy goal programing and quality function deployment for new product planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 654-663.
15
16. Lam, J. S. L., & Lai, K. H. (2015). Developing Environmental Sustainability by ANP QFD Approach: the Case of Shipping Operations. Journal of Cleaner Production,105, 275-284.
16
17. Liu, H. T., & Wang, C. H. (2010). An advanced quality function deployment model using fuzzy analytic network process. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3333-3351.
17
18. Mohammadi, A., & Dastyar, H. (2014). Evaluating Efficiency of Pharmaceutical Companies and Their Ranking via Data Envelopment Window Analysis, Journal of Health Accounting, 2(3), 23-39. (In Persian)
18
19. Mozaffar, M. M., & Kavousi, M. (2010). Design an Entrepreneurship Development Model for Small and Medium Organizations in the Technical and Professional organization. Journal of Development Evolution Management, 5, 31 -38
19
20. Mozaffari, M. R. (2017). Centralized Resource Allocation Based on the Value Efficiency in Dea and Dea-R. Journal of Operations Research in Its Applications, 14(3), 117-130. (In Persian)
20
21. Navai Aznaveh, Z., & Omidvari, M. (2017). Safety Risk Assessment in motor vehicle industries using William Fin and DEMATEL-ANP, Iranian Occupational Health, 14(1), 58-70. (In Persian)
21
22. Najafi, I., Abdollah Zadeh, V., & Amiri, H. (2014). Application of CCR-BCC Model and AP Method for Determining the Efficiency and Ranking of Pasargad Oil Company Units, Scientific Monthly. Scientific-Propagative Journal of Exploration & Production Oil & Gas, 120, 19-25. (In Persian)
22
23. Pourmahmoud, J., & Babazadeh, B. (2017). A New Group Data Envelopment Analysis Method for Ranking Design Requirements in Quality Function Deployment. International Journal of Industrial Mathematics, 9(4), 269-278.
23
24. Rahmani, K., Behlouli, N., & Sadeghzadeh Youshanlouei, B. (2012). Development the Mathematical Model QFD based on Fuzzy Approach, Productivity Management (Beyond Management), 5(20), 7-33. (In Persian)
24
25. Radman, K. (2008). Joint of QFD & DEA & Supply Chain. Timisoara Journal of Economics, 1(3), 271-278.
25
26. Ramanathan, R. & Yunfeng, J. (2009). Incorporating cost and environmental factors in quality function deployment using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 37(3), 711-723.
26
27. Toloo, M., & Joshushani, S. (2010). GAMS User's Guide with DEA Models, University Book Publishing, p. 318. (In Persian)
27
28. Valipour Khatir, M., Akbarzadeh, Z., & Mohammadi Nodehaki, Z. (2015). Manufacturing Strategy Evaluation using Fuzzy QFD Approach, Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 5(3), 169-183. (In Persian)
28
29. ZareAhmadabadi, H., & Ghasemi, F. (2015). Policy Making for Technology Acquisition Application of Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy DEMATEL (Case Study: Frit Industry of YAZD Province), Journal of Production and Operations Management, 6(1), 79-98. (In Persian)
29
30. Zare Mehrjerdi, Y., Owlia, M. S., & Dorodzani, A. T., (2012). Evaluation and Ranking the Relative Importance of Design Requirements by Combining QFD and DEA Techniques (Case Study: Tile Industry of Iran). International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Management. 23(2), 176-186. (In Persian)
30